Abstract
When modern instruments are used in laboratory research, dramatic changes occur at the microscopic level. Depending on the particular instrument employed, a specimen absorbs or emits radiation; alternatively, radiation is scattered, refracted or diffracted. In many studies, a researcher then renders a decisive judgment, whether to declare triumphantly that his/her findings reveal something real about a chemical substance or to refrain from such a judgment for fear of having produced an artificial effect. Both judgments presuppose that artificial conditions of the laboratory can be separated from the real effects. Some commentators charge that any pronouncement of success, that independently-existing properties are revealed from experimental studies, masks the inherent artificiality of all experimental techniques. The infiltration of socially-determined practices in laboratory research is so thoroughly contaminating that all declarations of access to Nature’s independent entities convey more about the scientist’s hubris than it does about the objectivity of techniques.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bennett, J.A. 1986. “The Mechanics’ Philosophy and the Mechanical Philosophy,” History of Science XXIV: 1–28.
Bradbury, S. 1967. The Evolution of the Microscope. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Brown, J.R. 1991. The Laboratory of the Mind. New York: Routledge.
Cassirer, E. 1923. Substance and Function & Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. New York: Dover Publications.
Charleston, R.J. and Angus-Butterworth, L.M. 1957. “Glass,” in A History of Technology: Volume III From the Renaissance to the Industrial Revolution c1500-c1750. Ed. Charles Singer, E.J. Holmyard, A.R. Hall and Trevor I. Williams. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 206–244.
Gooding, D. 1990. Experiment and the Making of Meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hackmann, W.D. 1989. “Scientific instruments: models of brass and aids to discovery,” in The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences, ed. David Gooding, Trevor Pinch, and Simon Schaffer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 31–66.
Hankins, T.L. and Silverman R.J. 1995. Instruments and the Imagination. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Harré, R. 1986. Varieties of Realism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hooke, R. 1961. Micrographia or Some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies Made by Magnifying Glasses with Observations and Inquiries thereupon. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
Kutschmann, W. 1986. “Scientific Instruments and the senses: towards an anthropological historiography of the natural sciences,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 1: 106–123.
Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Lelas, S. 1993. “Science as Technology,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 423–442.
Mitcham, C. 1994. Thinking Through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Parsons, M.L. 1997. “Atomic Absorption and Flame Emission Spectrometry,” in Analytical Instrumentation Handbook, 2nd ed., ed. G.W. Ewing. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc. Pp. 257–326.
Price, D.J. 1957. “The Manufacture of Scientific Instruments from c1500 to c1700,” in A History of Technology, ed. Charles Singer, E.J. Holmyard, A.R. Hall and Trevor I. Williams, Volume III: From the Renaissance to the Industrial Revolution, c1500-c1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 620–647.
Radder, H. 1996. In and About the World: Philosophical Studies of Science and Technology. Albany, New York: SUNY Press.
Rothbart, D. and Scherer, I. 1997. “Kant’s Critique of Judgment and the Scientific Investigation of Matter,” Hyle: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Chemistry 3: 65–80.
Schaffer, S. 1989. “Glass works: Newton’s prisms and the uses of experiment,” in The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences, ed. David Gooding, Trevor Pinch, and Simon Schaffer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 67–104.
Warner, D. 1990. “What is a scientific instrument, when did it become one, and why?” British Journal for the History of Science 23: 83–93.
— 1994. “Terrestrial Magnetism: For the Glory of God and the Benefit of Mankind,” in Instruments, ed. Albert Van Helden and Thomas Hankins. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Pp. 65–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rothbart, D. (2002). On the Dynamical Unity of Instrument and Substance. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Life Energies, Forces and the Shaping of Life: Vital, Existential. Analecta Husserliana, vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0417-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0417-6_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3914-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0417-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive