Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 8))

Abstract

In a rapidly changing environment, leadership for change is a complex undertaking. Leading change in schools concerns decisions about the changes that leaders wish to lead and how best to do so. It involves leadership of those things they do not want to lead but must lead. Finally, it concerns finding ways to connect these decisions coherently in order to make them meaningful to relevant stakeholders as well as for themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Psychological Association Board of Educational Af fairs. (1995). Learner-centered principles: A framework for school redesign and reform [On-line]. http://www.apa.org/ed/lcp.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Analytical Services. (2000). The evidence on the effects of teacher continuing professional development (CPD) on pupil attainment. London: Department for Education and Employment (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1999). On organizational learning, second edition. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C, Putnam, R., & Smith, D.M. (19S5). Action science. London: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C, & Schön, D.A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, G, & Schön, D.A. (1992). Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balazs, E. (1999). Institution-level educational management in Hungarian public education. In R. Bolam & F. van Wieringen (Eds.), Research on educational management in Europe (pp. 221–245) Munster/New York: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, M. (1996). The learning game: Arguments for an education revolution. London: Victor Gollancz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, M. (2000). High expectations and standardsfor all, no matter what: The leadership challengefor a world class education service. Nottingham: NCSL online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss, V. (1999). Opening minds. London: R.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss, V. (1998). Redefining work. London: R.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beare, H. (1996). Trends for global citizenship, for the world of work, and for personal formation. Jolimont, Victoria: IARTV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, B., & Robertson, J. (2001). Leaders online: Emotions and educational leadership in the context of online discussion groups. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1997). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, P., & Muiford, B. (1999). When will they ever learn? Another failure of centrally imposed change, School Leadership and Management 19(2), 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, K., & O’Connor, M. (1997). Managing by values. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunkett, D. (2000). Influence or irrelevance: Can social science research improve government? Secretary of State’s ESRC Lecture, February. London: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1985). Unfolding meaning. Loveland, CO: Foundation House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolam, R., McMahon A., Pocklington, K., & Weindling, R. (1995). Mentoring for new headteachers: The British experience. Journal of Educational Administration, 33(5), 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boruch, R., Petrosinso, A, & Chalmers, I. (1999, 15/16 July). The Campbell Collaboration: A proposal for systematic, multi-national and continuous reviews of evidence. Unpublished paper for a meeting at the School of Public Policy, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, T. (2001). Selly Park Technology College for Girls. In M. Maden (Ed.), Success against the odds — five years on: Revisiting effective schools in disadvantaged areas (pp. 250–274). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1988). The knowledge of man. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D.L., & Winne, P.H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis, Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B.J., & Spinks, J.M. (1998). Beyond the self-managing school. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champy, J.A. (1997). Preparing for organizational change. In F. Hesselbein, M. Goldsmith and R. Beckhard (Eds.), The organization of the future (pp. 9–16). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, N. (1995). Developing a sense of mission at Whitefields School: the tension between action research and school management, Educational Management and Administration, 23(3), 206–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrispeels, J. (1996). Effective schools and home-school partnership roles: A framework for parental involvement, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(4), 297–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. (2000). Learning schools, learning systems. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. (1998). Parent, student and teacher collaboration: The power of three. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collarbone, P. (1998). Letter from the Director, Leading Edge, 2(2), 49, London: Leadership Centre University of London Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordingley, P. (1996). Teachers and research: The TTA’s role in bridging the gap. Research Intelligence, 58, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordingley, P. (1999). Pedagogy, management and the TTA research agenda. In T. Bush, L. Bell, R. Bolam, R. Glatter & P. Ribbins (Eds.), Educational management: Re-defining theory, policy and practice (pp. 218–228). London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, J.B., & Leithwood, K. (1993). Enhancing knowledge utilization as a strategy for school improvement, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 14(3), 305–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creese, M., & Earley, P. (1999). Improving schools andgoverning bodies: Making a difference. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalin, P., & Rust, V.D. (1996). Towards schooling for the twenty-first century. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daresh, J.C., & Playko, M.A. (1992.) The professional development of school administrators: Preservice, induction and in-service applications. London: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Ellison, L. (1998). Strategie direction and development of the school. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence-based education? British Journal of Educational Studies. 47(2), 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C, Harris, A., Hadfield, M., Tolley, H., & Beresford, J. (2000). Leading schools in times of change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J., Al Mufti, I., Amagi, A., Carneiro, R., Chung, F, Geremek, B., Gorham, W., Kornhauser, A., Manley, M., Padrón Quero, M., Savané, M-A., Singh, K., Stavenhagen, R., Suhr, M.W., & Nanzhao, Z. (1996). Learning: The treasure within — Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W.E. (1986). Out of the crisis: Quality productivity and competitive position. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfEE. (2001). Learning and teaching: A strategy for professional development. London: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfEE. (2000). Leadership Programme for Serving Headteachers handbook for trainers. London: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfEE. (1999). The National Numeracy Strategy: Framework for teaching mathematics: Reception to Year 6. London: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfEE. (1998a). The National Literacy Strategy: Framework for teaching Reception to Y6. London: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfEE. (1998b). Home school agreements: Guidance for schools. London: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfEE. (1995). Governing bodies and school effectiveness. London: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimmock, C. (2000). Designing the learning-centred school: A cross-cultural perspective. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinham, S., & Scott, C. (1997). Teacher and executive satisfaction, motivation and health. The Practising Administrator. 4, 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, N. (1994). The organizational learning cycle. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W., & Ponder G.A. (1977). The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making, Interchange, 8(3), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, P. (1999). How do teachers respond to data? In C. Conner (Ed.), Assessment in action in primary schools. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, D. (1987). School leadership and instructional improvement. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, L., & Katz, S. (In press). Leading in a data-rich world. In Leithwood, K. et al., (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 982–1002). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, L., & Lee, L. (1998). Evaluation of the Manitoba School Improvement Program. Toronto: Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkind, D. (1997). Schooling and family in the postmodern world. In A. Hargreaves (Ed.), Rethinking educational change with heart and mind (pp. 27–42). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Buckingham: OU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPPI (2000). Evidence for policy and practice. (pamphlet) London: EPPI Centre, Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. (1995) School/family/partnerships: caring for the children we share, Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9), 710–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (1994). Developingprofessional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (1995). Professional careers and professional development: some intersections. In T.R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 227–252). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. (1999). Teacher morale, job satisfaction and motivation. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. (1996). The human side of school change: Reform, resistance, and the real-life problems of innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). The new public management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M. (2001). Students of radical agents of change, Journal of Educational Change, 2(3), 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, D., & Stoll, L. (1998). Educational change: Easier said than done. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan and D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 297–322). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitz-Gibbon, CT. (2000). Quality, science and Soros’ reflexivity concept: a value-added approach, in E. Balazs, F. van Wieringen & L. Watson (Eds.), Quality and educational management. Budapest: Wolters Kluwer Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change, third edition. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Teaching Council Trust. (1993). The continuing professional development of teachers. London: General Teaching Council Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, M. (1998). The Lincolnshire Small Schools Project. In J. West-Burnham & F. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Leadership and professional development in schools. London: Financial Times/Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1996). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace. G. (1995). School leadership: Beyond education management. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady, N., Macpherson, M., & Muiford, B. (1995). Problem-based learning in educational administration through block delivery modes, International Studies in Educational Administration, 23(1), 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J., Hopkins, D., Reynolds, D., Wilcox, B., Farrell, S., & Jesson, D. (1999). Improving schools: Performance and potential. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, S. (1997). The human brain: A guided tour. London, Weidenfield & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. (1977). Servant leadership. New York: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T.R. (1995). Professional development in education: in search of the optimal mix. In T.R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 114–132). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halasz, G. (2000). System regulation changes in education and their implications for management development. Unpublished keynote paper for the Annual Conference of the European Network for the Improvement of Research and Development in Educational Management (ENIRDEM) September 23, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. (1992). School leadership development: An introduction, Education and Urban Society, 24(3), 300–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Heek, R. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional leadership behavior of principals, The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (1997). Educational research and teaching: a response to David Hargreaves’ TTA lecture, British Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 141–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1995). Beyond certainty, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London, Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2001) The emotional geographies of teachers’ relations with colleagues. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 503–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (1998). What’s worth fighting for in education? Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D.H. (1996). Teaching as research-basedprofession: Possibilities andprospects: The Teacher Training Agency Annual Lecture 1996. London: TTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D.H. (1997). In defence of research for evidence-based teaching: A rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley, British Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 405–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. (1998). Creative professionalism: The role of teachers in the knowledge society. London: DEMOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D.H. (1999a). The knowledge-creating school. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 122–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. (1999b). Helping practitioners explore their sehool’s culture. In J. Prosser (Ed.), School Culture (pp.). London, Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harker, D.R., Gibbs, C.J., Ryan, H., Weir, K., & Adams, D. (1998). Teacher 2000 project: an international study of teacher satisfaction, motivation and health: The New Zealand report. Palmerston North: Massey University College of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, A.W., & Weindling, D. (1996). Developing successful leaders in K. Leithwood et al. (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 309–336). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, J., Kinder, K., & Keys, W. (1993). Restructuring INSET: Privatisation and its alternatives. Slough: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, RW. (1997). Towards high standards for all students: Victorian research and experience. IARTV Seminar Series No. 61. Victoria: IARTV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillage, J., Pearson, R., Anderson A., & Tamkin, P. (1998). Excellence in research on schools. London, DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, C. (1991). Educational leadership: The moral art. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1995) Contemporary public management: a new global paradigm? Public Policy and Administration, 10(2), 104–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D. (1986). In-service training and educational development: An international survey. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D. (1995). Towards effective school improvement, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6(3), 265–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D., & Lagerweij, N. (1996). The school improvement knowledge base. In D. Reynolds, R. Bollen, B. Creemers, D. Hopkins, L. Stoll & N. Lagerweij (Eds.), Making good schools: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement (pp. 59–93). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M. (1983). Recipes for busy kitchens: A situational analysis of routine knowledge use in schools. Knowledge, Diffusion, Utilization, 4, 478–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, J. (1998). Synchronicity: The inner path of leadership. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1988). Student achievement through stajf development. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B., Calhoun, E., & Hopkins, D. (1999). The new structure of school improvement: Inquiring schools and achieving students. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karstanje, P. (1999). Developments in school management from a European perspective. In R. Bolam & F. van Wieringen (Eds.), Research on educational management in Europe (pp. 11–30). Munster/New York: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D.A. (1975). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, N.M., & McCombs, B.L. (1998). How students learn: Reforming schools through leamer-centered education. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauder, H., Hughes, D., et al. (1999). Trading in futures: Why markets in education don’t work. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, S., & Glover, D. (2000). Educational leadership and learning: Practice, policy and research. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Chapman, J., Corson, D., Hallinger, R, & Hart, A. (1996). International handbook of educational leadership and administration. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1998). Leadership and other conditions which foster organizational learning in schools. In K. Leithwood & K.S. Louis (Eds.), Organizational learning in schools (pp. 229–252). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1995). An organisational learning perspective on school responses to central policy initiatives, School Organisation, 15(3), 229–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Louis, K.S. (1998). Organizational learning in schools. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levacic, R. (1999). Managing resources for school effectiveness in England and Wales: institutionalising a rational approach. In R. Bolam & F. van Wieringen (Eds.), Research on educational management in Europe (pp. 95–110). Munster/New York: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (2000). Putting students at the centre of education reform, Journal of Educational Change, 1(2), 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A., & Grolnick, M. (1996). Networks and reform in American education. Teachers College Record, 98(1), 7–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J.W. (2001). Professional development in pursuit of school reform. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K.S. (1994). Beyond managed change: Rethinking how schools improve, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(1), 2–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K.S. (1998). Reconnecting knowledge utilization and school improvement: Two steps forward, one step back. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International hand-book of educational change (pp. 1074–1095). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K.S., Kruse, S., & Marks, H. (1996). Teachers’ professional community and school reform, American Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 719–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K.S., & Miles, M.B. (1990). Improving the urban high school: What works and why. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath, J. (1998). Effective school leadership: Responding to change. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath, J. (1999). Schools must speak for themselves: The case for self-evaluation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath, J., & Mortimore, P. (2001). Improving school effectiveness. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGilchrist, B., Mortimore, P., Savage, J., & Beresford, C. (1995). Planning matters: the impact of development planning in primary schools. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGilchrist, B., Myers, K., & Reed, J. (1997). The intelligent school. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maden, M. (2001). Success against the odds-five years on: Revisiting effective schools in disadvantaged areas. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Male, T. (2001). Is NPQH making a difference? School Leadership and Management, 21(4), 463–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, J;, Smith, I., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., Sammons, P, MacBeath, J., Boyd, B., & MacGilchrist, B. (2001). Views of pupils, teachers and parents: Vital indictaors of effectiveness and improvement, In J. MacBeath & P. Mortimore (Eds.), Improving school effectiveness (pp. 74–101). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, A. (1999). Promoting continuing professional development for teachers: an achievable target for school leaders? In T. Bush, L. Bell, R. Bolam, R. Glatter & P. Ribbins (Eds.), Educational management: Redeflning theory, policy and practice (pp. 102–113). London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, F. (1999). Brain research and learning: An introduction. Research Matters No. 10: School Improvement Network. London: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, M.H. (1990). Real school: A Universal drama and disparate experience. In D.E. Mitchell & M.E. Metz (Eds.), Education politics for the new century (pp. 75–91). New York: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlewood, D., Coleman, M., & Lumby, J. (1999). Practitioner research in education: Making a difference. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos. L., & Dempster, N. (1998). Some comparative learnings from the study, In J. MacBeath (Ed.), Effective school leadership: Responding to change (pp. 98–111). London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore, P. (1998). The wad to improvement: Reflections on school effectiveness. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore, P., Gopinathan, S., Leo, E., Myers, K., Sharpe, L., Stoll, L., & Mortimore, J. (2000). The culture of change: Case studies of improving schools in Singapore and London. London Institute of Education: Bedford Way Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore, P., & Mortimore, J., with Thomas, H., Cairns, R., & Taggart, B. (1992). The innovative uses of non-teaching staff in primary and secondary schools project: Final report. London: Department of Education and Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore, R, Sammons, R, Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: The junior years. Somerset Open Books. (Reprinted in 1994 by Paul Chapman: London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, K. (1996). School improvement in practice: The Schools Make a Difference Project. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naisbitt, J. (1997). From nation states to networks, in R. Gibson (Ed.), Rethinking the future (pp.). London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naisbett, J., & Aburdene, P. (1990). Megatrends 2000: Ten new directions for the 1990’s. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Education (1995). Success against the odds: Effective schools in disadvantaged areas. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F.M., & Wehlage, G.G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators by the Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. Madison, WI: CORS.

    Google Scholar 

  • NFER (National Foundation for Educational Research). (2000). Playing for success: An evaluation of the first year. London: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct, Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1996). The connected family: Bridging the digitalgeneration gap. Atlanta: Longstreet Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purkey, W.W., & Novak, J. (1984). Inviting school success, third edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, J., & Stoll, L. (2000). Promoting organisational learning in schools: the role of feedback. In S. Askew (Ed.), Feedback for organisational learning (pp. 127–143). London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D., Bollen, R., Creemers, B., Hopkins, D., Stoll, L., & Lagerweij, N. (1996). Making good schools: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudduck, J., Chaplain, R., & Wallace, G. (1996). School improvement: What can pupils teil us? London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salovey, R, & Mayer, J.D. (1990). Emotional intelligence, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling: Research, theory and practice. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1985). Organisational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P. (1991). The art of the long view. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebba, J. (1997). Educational research: developing and implementing the Government’s action plan, Research Intelligence, 67, 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebba, J. (2000). Developing evidence-informed policy and practice: a national perspective. Paper presented at the Sixth BEMAS Research Conference, Cambridge, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzner, K., & Bentley, T. (1999). The creative age. London: DEMOS

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1997). Through the eye of the needie. In R. Gibson (Ed.), Rethinking the future (pp. 122–145). London: Nicholas Brearley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, R, Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T, Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A., (2000). Schools that learn. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T.J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silins, H., & Muiford, B. (in press). Leadership and school results. In K. Leithwood et al. (Eds.), Second international handbook of research on educational leadership and administration. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W.F, & Andrews, R.L. (1989). Instructional leadership: How principals make a difference. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, M.A. (1995). Teacher learning in the workplace: implications for school reform, In T.R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 92–113). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (1995). Teachers’ work and the labour process of teaching: Central problematics in professional development. In T.R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 69–91). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soo Hoo, S., (1993). Students as partners in research and restructuring schools, Educational Forum, 57, 386–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, G. (1999). Headship, leadership and school improvement. In G. Southworth & P. Lincoln (Eds.), Supporting improving primary schools: The role of heads and LEAs in raising standards (pp. 69–86). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, G., & Conner, C. (1999). Managing improving primary schools: Using evidence-based management and leadership. London: Falmer Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Starratt, R.J. (1993). The drama of leadership. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starratt, R.J., & Guare, R. (1995, fall-winter). The spirituality of leadership, Planning and Changing, 190–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L. (1999a). Realising our potential: understanding and developing capacity for lasting improvement, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 503–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L. (1999b). School culture: black hole or fertile garden for improvement. In J. Prosser (Ed.), School culture (pp. 30–47). London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1998). The cruising school: The unidentified ineffective school, in L. Stoll & K. Myers (Eds.), No quick fvces: Perspectives on schools in difficulties (pp. 189–206). London, Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., MacBeath, J., & Mortimore, P. (2001). Beyond 2000: Where next for school effectiveness and school improvement? In J. MacBeath and P. Mortimore (Eds.), Improving school effectiveness (pp. 191–207). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C, & Reynolds, D. (2000). International handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TTA (1999). Improving standards: Research and evidence-based practice. London, Teacher Training Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, K. (2000, 22 September). Governors say pay up or ease off. Times Educational Supplement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooley, J., & Darby, D. (1998). Education research: An Ofsted critique. London, OFSTED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troman, G., & Woods, P. (2000). Careers under stress: Teachers’ adaptations at a time of intensive reform, Journal of Educational Change, 1(3), 253–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Woofolk, A., & Hoy, W.K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: lts meaning and measure, Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • TTA (1998). Leadership programme for serving headteachers handbook for trainers. London: TTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, C. (2001). Researching home-school relations: a critical approach. In J. Collins & D. Cook (Eds.), Understanding learning: Influences and outcomes (pp. 187–202). London: Paul Chapman, in association with the Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. (1991). School centred management training. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weindling, D. (1999). Stages of headship. In T. Bush, L. Bell, R., Bolam, R., Glatter and P. Ribbins (Eds.), Educational management: Re-defining theory, policy and practice. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, M. (1994). Leadership and the new science. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G. (in press). Teacher professionalism in new times, Journal of In-service Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1997). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state and the market place. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikeley, F. (1998). Dissemination of research as a tooi for school improvement? School Leadership and Management, 18(10), 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, J. (1996). Development through collaborative working: a case study of mathematics INSET. In G. Claxton et al. (Eds.), Liberating the Learner: Lessons for Professional Development in Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, RA. (2000). Varieties and themes in producer engagement: structure and agency in the schools’ public market, British Journal of Sociology of Education. 21(2), 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, RA, Bagley, C, & Glatter, R. (1998). School responsiveness in a competitive climate: the public market in England and Wales, Education Administration Quarterly, 34 (supplement) 650–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stoll, L., Bolam, R., Collarbone, P. (2002). Leading for Change: Building Capacity for Learning. In: Leithwood, K., et al. Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0375-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0375-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3920-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0375-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics