Advertisement

What Do You Call People With Visions? The Role of Vision, Mission and Goals in School Leadership and Improvement

Chapter
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 8)

Abstract

In this section we begin the process of unpacking the conceptual foundations of these related terms. We assert that until scholars distinguish more clearly among these terms and their underlying assumptions, it will be difficult to craft appropriate strategies for either empirical study or practice.

Keywords

Student Achievement Goal Setting Organizational Learning Transformational Leadership Goal Attainment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, R., & Soder, R. (1987). Principal instructional leadership and school achievement. Educational Leadership, 44, 9–11.Google Scholar
  2. Bamburg, J., & Andrews, R. (1990). School goals, principals and achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(3), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of an executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barth, R. (1990). Improving schools from within. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  7. Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (1996). Leading with soul. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (1992a). Leading and managing: Effects of context, culture, and gender. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22, 314–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (1992b). Reframing organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Brewer, D. (1993). Principals and student outcomes: Evidence from U.S. high schools. Economics of Education Review, 12(4), 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brookover, W., Beamer, L., Efthim, H., Hathaway, D., Lezotte, L., Miller, S., Passalacqua, J., & Tarnatzky, L. (1982). Creating effective schools: An inservice program for enhancing school learning climate and achievement. Holmes Beach FL: Learning Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Brookover, W., & Lezotte, L. (1979). Changes in school characteristics coincident with changes in student achievement. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  13. Brookover, W., Schweitzer, J., Schneider, J., Beady, C, Flood, P., & Wisenbaker, A. (1978). Elementary school climate and school achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 301–318.Google Scholar
  14. Bryk, A., & Raudenbusch, S. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Carroll, S., & Tosi, H. (1973). Management by objective: Applications and research. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  16. Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (1968). Motivational processes in groups: Introduction. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (pp. ). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  17. Cheng, Y.C. (1991a). Leadership style of principals and organizational process in secondary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 29(2), 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheng, Y.C. (1991). Organizational environment in schools: Commitment, control, disengagement, and headless. Educational Administration Quarterly 27(4), 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cheng, Y.C. (1994). Principal’s leadership as a critical factor for school performance: Evidence from multilevels of primary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crandall, D., Eiseman, J., & Louis, K.S. (1986). Strategie planning issues that bear on the success of school improvement efforts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(3), 21–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Creemers, B. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  22. Cressey, D. (1958). Achievement of an unstated organizational goal. Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crown, D., & Rosse, J. (1995). Yours, mine, and ours: Facilitating group productivity through the integration of individual and group goals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 64(2), 138–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cuban, L. (1984a, April 24). The sham of school reform: Sleight of hand with numbers. San Jose Mercury, lc, 2c.Google Scholar
  25. Cuban, L. (1984b). Transforming the frog into a prince: Effective schools research, policy, and practice at the district level. Harvard Educational Review, 54, 129–151.Google Scholar
  26. Davis, M., & Stackhouse, A. (1977). The importance offormal appearances. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Pacific Sociological Association, Sacramento.Google Scholar
  27. Deal, T., & Celotti, L. (1977). “Loose coupling” and the school administrator: Some recent research finding. Stanford University: Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching.Google Scholar
  28. Deal, T., & Peterson, K. (1990). The principal’s role in shaping school culture. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  29. Deal, T., & Kennedy, A. (1982). Corporate cultures. Reading MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  30. Deniston, O., Rosenstock, I., & Getting, V. (1968). Evaluation of program effectiveness. Public Health Reports, 83, 325–330.Google Scholar
  31. Dent, A. (1959). Organizational correlates of the goals of business management. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12, 365–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dillard, C. (1995). Leading with her life: An African American feminist (re)interpretation of leadership for an urban high school principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(4), 539–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dornbusch, S., & Scott, W. (1975). Evaluation and the exercise of authority. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Drucker, P. (1995). Managing in a time of great change. New York: Talley House, Dutton.Google Scholar
  35. Eberts, R., & Stone, J. (1988). Student achievement in public schools: Do principals make a difference? Economics of Education Review, 7(3), 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15–24.Google Scholar
  37. Edmonds, R. (1982). Programs of school improvement: An overview. Educational Leadership, 40, 4–11.Google Scholar
  38. Edmonds, R., & Frederiksen, J. (1978). Searchfor effective schools: The Identification and analysis of schools that instructionally effective for poor children. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Center for Urban Studies.Google Scholar
  39. Frese, M., Stewart, J., & Hannover, B. (1987). Goal orientation and planfulness: Action styles as personality concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1182–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Friedlander, F, & Pickle, H. (1968). Components of effectiveness in small organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13, 292–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  42. Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). What’s worth fighting for? Working together for your school. Andover, MA: Regional Lab for Educational Improvement.Google Scholar
  43. Gable, R., & Manning, M. (1999). The role of teacher collaboration in school reform. Childhood Education, 74(4), 182–86.Google Scholar
  44. Georgopoulos, B., & Tannenbaum, A. (1957). A study of organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 22, 534–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Given, B. (1994). Operation breakthrough for continuous self-systems improvement. Intervention in School & Clinic, 30(1), 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Glasman, N., & Fuller, J. (1992). Assessing the decision-making patterns of school principals. The International Journal of Educational Management, 6(3), 22–30.Google Scholar
  47. Glasman, N., & Heek, R. (1992). The changing leadership role of the principal: Implications for principal assessment. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Goldring E., & Pasternak, R. (1994). Principals’ coordinating strategies and school effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gouldner, A. (1959). Organizational analysis. In R. Merton et al., (Eds.), Sociology today (pp. ). New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  50. Grusky, O. (1959). Organizational goals and the behavior of informal leaders. American Journal of Sociology, 65, 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gulick, L. (1948). Administrative reflections from World War II. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  52. Gunn, J., & Holdaway, E. (1986). Perceptions of effectiveness, influence, and satisfaction of senior high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(2).Google Scholar
  53. Haberstroh, C. (1965). Organization design and systems analysis. In J. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. ). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  54. Hallinger, P. (1996). Challenging and changing Primrose. Prime Focus, 2(4), 20–29.Google Scholar
  55. Hallinger, P., Bickman, L., & Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership and student achievement. Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 498–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hallinger, P., & Heek, R. (1996a). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hallinger, P., & Heek, R. (1996b). The principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of methodological issues, 1980–95. In K. Leithwood et al. (Eds.), The International Handbook of Research in Educational Administration (pp. 723–784). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academie Press.Google Scholar
  58. Hallinger, P., & Heek, R. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hallinger, P., & Heek, R. (1999). Can leadership enhance school effectiveness? In Bush et al. (Eds.). Educational management: Redefining theory, policy, and practice (pp. 178–190). London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  60. Hallinger, P., Leithwood, K., & Murphy, J. (1993). Cognitive perspectives on educational leadership. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  61. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94(3), 328–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hathaway, D. (1981). Discontinuities in educational goals. The Generator, 11, 21–29.Google Scholar
  63. Handy, C. (1994). The age of paradox. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business press.Google Scholar
  64. Heek, R. (1992). Principal instructional leadership and the identification of high-and low-achieving schools: The application of discriminant techniques. Administrator’s Notebook, 34(7), 1–4.Google Scholar
  65. Heek, R. (1993). School context, principal leadership, and achievement: The case of secondary schools in Singapore. The Urban Review, 25(2), 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Heek, R. (2000). Estimating the impact of school quality on school outcomes and improvement: A value-added approach. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(4), 513–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Heek, R., & Brandon, P. (1995). Teacher empowerment and the implementation of school-based reforms. Empowerment in Organizations: An International Journal, 3(4), 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Heek, R., Larsen, T., & Marcoulides, G. (1990). Principal instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 94–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Heek, R., & Marcoulides, G. (1996). School culture and performance: Testing the invariance of an organizational model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(1), 76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Heek, R., Marcoulides, G., & Lang, P. (1991). Principal instructional leadership and school achievement: The application of discriminant techniques. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(2), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Heek, R., & Thomas, S. (2000). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  72. High, R., & Achilles, C. (1986). An analysis of influence-gaining behaviors of principals in schools of varying levels of instructional effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(1), 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Hill, P., & Rowe, K. (1996). Multilevel modeling in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7,1, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Honig, B. (1984, May 6). School reform is working: What’s wrong with goal setting and measurement? San Jose Mercury, 1c, 2c.Google Scholar
  75. Hopkins, D., & Ainscow, M. (1993). Making sense of school improvement: An interim account of the IQEA project. Paper presented to the ESRC Seminar Series on School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Sheffeld.Google Scholar
  76. Hoy, W., & Miskel, C. (1982). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice, second edition. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  77. Hoy, W., & Miskel, C. (1987). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice, third edition. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  78. Hoy, W., Tarter, C, & Bliss, J. (1990). Organizational climate, school health, and effectiveness: A comparative analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(3), 260–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Huse, E., & Kay, E. (1964). Improving employee productivity through work planning. In J. Blood (Ed.), The personnel job in a changing world (pp. xx–xx). New York: American Management Association.Google Scholar
  80. Jacobsson, C, & Pousette, A. (2001). Coordinating work in Swedish schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(2), 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Jantzi, D., & Leithwood, K. (1993). Toward an explanation of variation in teachers’ perceptions of transformational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(4), 512–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Kimpston, R. (1982). Employing systematic procedures in goal setting: A matter of necessity, not choice. Planning and Changing, 13, 31–47.Google Scholar
  83. Kirst, M. (1975). The rise and fall of PPBS in California. Phi Delta Kappan, 54, 534–538.Google Scholar
  84. Kleine-Kracht, P. (1993). Indirect instructional leadership: An administrator’s choice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(2), 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  86. Krug, E (1986). The relationship between the instructional management behavior of elementary school principals and student achievement. University of San Francisco: Unpublished doctoral dissertation, ERIC Document No. 8722942.Google Scholar
  87. Larson-Knight, B. (2000). Leadership, culture and organizational learning. In K. Leithwood (Ed.), Understanding schools as intelligent systems (pp. 125–140). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  88. Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Leithwood, K., Begley, R, & Cousins, B. (1990). The nature, causes and consequences of principals’ practices: A agenda for future research. Journal of Educational Administration, 28(4), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Leithwood, K., Begley, P., & Cousins, B. (1992). Developing expert leadership for future schools. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  91. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1990). Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(1), 249–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., Silins, H., & Dart, B., (1993). Using the appraisal of school leaders as an instrument for school restructuring. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 85–109.Google Scholar
  93. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1998). Leadership and other conditions which foster organizational learning in schools. In K. Leithwood & K.S. Louis (Eds.), Organizational learning in schools (pp. 67–90). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  94. Leithwood, K., & Steinbach, R. (1995). Expert problem solving. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  95. Lezotte, L., & Bancroft, B. (1984). Growing use of the effective schools model for school improvement. Educational Leadership, 42, 23–30.Google Scholar
  96. Likert, R., & Seashore, S. (1963). Making cost controls work. Harvard Business Review, 41(6), 96–108.Google Scholar
  97. Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of “muddling through.” Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Lortie, D. (1969). The balance of control and autonomy in elementary school teaching. In A. Etzioni (Ed.), The semi-professions and their organization (pp. xx–xx). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  99. Louis, K.S., Toole, J., & Hargreaves, A. (1999). Rethinking school improvement. In J. Murphy & K.S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration, second edition (pp. 251–276). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  100. Louis, K.S., & Miles, M. (1990). Managing reform: Lessons from urban high schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(2), 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Maehr, M., Midgley, C, & Urdan, T. (1992). School leader as motivator. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3), 410–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Mali, P. (1975). How to manage by objectives: A short coursefor managers. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  103. March, J., & Olsen, J. (1976) Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  104. Marcoulides, G., & Heek, R. (1993). Organizational culture and performance: Proposing and testing a model. Organization Science, 4(3), 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Marks, H., Louis, K.S., & Printy, S. (2000). The capacity for organizational learning: Implications for pedagogical quality and student achievement. In K. Leithwood (Ed.), Understanding schools as intelligent systerns (pp. 239–266). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  106. McCormick-Larkin, M., & Kritek, W. (1982, December). Milwaukee’s project RISE. Educational Leadership, 40, 16–21.Google Scholar
  107. McLaughlin, M. (1990). The Rand change agent study revisited. Educational Researcher, 5, 11–16.Google Scholar
  108. Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategie planning. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  110. Mintzberg, H. (1998). Covert leadership: Notes on managing professionals. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 140–148.Google Scholar
  111. Mohr, L. (1973). The concept of organizational goals. American Political Science Review, 4, 470–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Muthén, B. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 22(3), 376–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Odiorne, G. (1965). Management by objectives: A system ofmanagerial leadership. New York: Pitman.Google Scholar
  114. Ogawa, R., & Bossert, S. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(2), 224–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Ogawa, R., Crowson, R., & Goldring, E. (1999). Enduring dilemmas of school organization. In J. Murphy & K. Louis (Eds.), The handbook of research in educational administration (pp.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  116. O’Toole, J. (1995). Leading change. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  117. Ouston, J. (1999). School effectiveness and school improvement: Critique of a movement. In T. Bush, L. Bell, R. Bolam, R. Glatter, & P. Ribbins (Eds.), Educational management: Redeflning theory, policy, and practice (pp. 166–177). London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  118. Pang, N.S. (1998). The binding forces that hold school organizations together. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 314–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  120. Perrow, C. (1968). Organizational goals. In D. Sills (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 305–311). Country: Publisher?Google Scholar
  121. Perrow, C. (1961). The analysis of goals in complex organizations. American Sociological Review, 26, 854–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Peters, T, & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
  123. Pounder, D., Ogawa, R., & Adams, E. (1995). Leadership as an organization-wide phenomena: lts impact on school performance. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(4), 564–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Price, J. (1968). Organizational effectiveness: An inventory of propositions. Homewood IL: Richard Irwin.Google Scholar
  125. Purkey, S., & Smith, M. (1985) Educational police and school effectiveness. The Elementary School Journal, 85, ??-??.Google Scholar
  126. Purkey, S., & Smith, M. (1983). Effective schools-a review. The Elementary School Journal, 83, 426–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Raia, A. (1965). Goal setting and self-control. Journal of Management Studies, 2, 34–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Raudenbush, S., & Sampson, R. (1999). Assessing direct and indirect effects in multilevel designs with latent variables. Sociological Methods and Research, 28(2), 123–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Ridgeway, V. (1956). Dysfunctional consequences of performance measurement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 241–246.Google Scholar
  130. Rosenholtz, S. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  131. Rowan, B., Raudenbush, S., & Kang, S. (1991). Organizational design in high schools: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Education, 99(2), 238–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Rutter, M., Maugham, B., Mortimore, R, Ouston, J., & Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: secondary schools and their effects on children. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  133. Sammons, R, Nuttall, D., Cuttance, R, & Thomas, S. (1995). Continuity of school effects: A longitudinal analysis of primary and secondary school effects on GCSE performance. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6(4), 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Schagen, I., & Weston, P. (1998). Insight into school effectiveness from analysis of OFSTED’s school inspection database. Oxford Review of Education, 24(3), 337–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Schein, E. (1996). Culture: The missing concept in organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Scott, C, & Teddlie, C. (1987). Student, teacher, and principal academie expectations and attributed responsibility as predictors of student achievement: A causal modeling approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington.Google Scholar
  137. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York Doubleday.Google Scholar
  138. Sergiovanni, T. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  139. Sheppard, B., & Brown, J. (2000). The transformation of secondary schools in learning organizations. In K. Leithwood (Ed.), Understanding schools as intelligent systems (pp. 293–314). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  140. Shouse, R. (1998). Restructuring’s impact on student achievement: Contrasts by school urban city. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(Supplemental), 677–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Silins, H. (1994). The relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and school improvement outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 272–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Silins, H., Muiford, W., Zarins, S., & Bishop, P. (2000). Leadership for organizational learning in Australian schools. In K. Leithwood (Ed.), Understanding schools as intelligent systems (pp. 267–292). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  143. Simon, H. (1964). On the concept of organizational goal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Smylie, M., & Hart, A. (1999). School leadership for teacher learning and change: A human and social capital development perspective. In J. Murphy & K. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration, second edition (pp. 421–442). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  145. Snyder, E., & Ebmeier, H. (1992). Empirical linkages among principal behaviors and intermediate outcomes: Implications for principal evaluation. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 75–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Staw, B. (1980). Rationality and justification in organizational life. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  147. Steiner, G. (1979). Strategie planning: What every manager must know. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  148. Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1992). Effecting school change: The Halton approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 3(1), 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1994). School effectiveness and school improvement: Voices from the field. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(2), 149–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Teddlie, C, Falkowski, C, Stringfield, S., Desselle, S., & Garvue, R. (1984). Louisiana school effectiveness study: Phase two, 1982–84. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
  151. Teddlie, C, & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  152. Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  153. Thompson, J., & McEwen, W. (1958). Organizational goals and environment: Goal setting as an interaction process. American Sociological Review, 23, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Timperley & Robinson, (1998). Collegiality in schools: lts nature and implications for problem solving. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(Supplemental), 608–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Uline, C, Miller, D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998). School effectiveness: The underlying dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(4), 462–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Warriner, C. (1965). The problem of organizational purpose. Sociological Quarterly, 6, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Warner, W. (1967). Problems in measuring the goal attainment of voluntary organizations. Journal of Adult Education, 19, 5.Google Scholar
  158. Weick, K. (1982). Administering education in loosely coupled schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 63, 673–676.Google Scholar
  159. Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Weiss, A (1981). Assessing nonconventional outcomes of schooling. Review of Research in Education, 8, 405–454.Google Scholar
  161. Wiley, S. (1998). Contextual effects on student achievement: School leadership and professional community. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  162. Woods, P., Bagley, C, & Glatter, R. (1998). School responsiveness in a competitive climate: The public market in England. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(Supplemental), 650–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Yuchtman, E., & Seashore, S. (1967). A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 32, 891–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Zald, M. (1963). Comparative analysis and measurement of organizational goals. Sociological Quarterly, 4, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vanderbilt UniversityUSA
  2. 2.University of Hawaii at ManoaUSA

Personalised recommendations