Abstract
Outlining the key features of the national assessment system in England might seem a fairly straightforward task, but the story is a complicated one, and the parameters of the system are constantly changing. The system has its origins in a highly devolved and entirely voluntaristic system of school examinations; has been driven by differing political priorities over a period of 15 to 20 years; and is still evolving as differing priorities interact with implementation difficulties. Moreover, although national assessment was conceived of in the context of a United Kingdom-wide government for implementation across the UK, and at various points in this chapter I shall refer to the UK as if it were a single administrative unit, implementation has differed across England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Scotland and Northern Ireland have always had separate systems of education from England and Wales and, recently, constitutional devolution has placed even more decision making power with the regional parliament in Scotland and regional assemblies in Wales and Northern Ireland. Thus, although the broad thrust of policy is similar across the UK, implementation has differed across the four countries, and hence the detail of the chapter refers only to England. These variations derive at least in part from variation in the strength of the ideological debate underlying national assessment and, although the development of policy has been broadly similar across the UK, it has been implemented in the regions with rather less visceral hatred of the teaching profession than has been manifested by central government in London. Indeed, one of the main tasks in a review such as this is to try to identify what principles of national assessment might be appropriately discussed as policy options elsewhere, shorn of the particular ideological battles which pervaded invention and implementation in England.
Keywords
- National Assessment
- National Curriculum
- Attainment Target
- Authentic Assessment
- Examination Board
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Becher, T., Eraut, M., & Knight, J. (1981). Policies for educational accountability. London, Heinemann.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7–74.
Brown, M. (1988). Issues in formulating and organising attainment targets in relation to their assessment. In H. Torrance (Ed), National assessment and testing: A research response, (pp. 15–25). London: British Educational Research Association.
Butterfield, S. (1995). Educational objectives and national assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Croll, P. (Ed.). (1996). Teachers, pupils and primary schooling: Continuity and change. London, Cassell.
Cullingford, C. (Ed.). (1999). An inspector calls. London: Kogan Page.
Daugherty, R. (1995). National curriculum assessment: A review of policy 1987-1994. London: Falmer.
Dearing, R. (1993). The national curriculum and its assessment: Final report. London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
DES (Department of Education and Science). (1977). Education in schools. A consultative document. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, (cmnd: 6869)
DES (Department of Education and Science). (1987). The national curriculum 5-16. A consultation document. London: Author.
DES (Department of Education and Science). (1990). English in the national curriculum (No. 2). London: Author.
DFE (Department for Education). (1992). Testing 7-year olds in 1992: Results of the national curriculum assessments in England. London: Author.
DFEE (Department for Education and Employment). (1996). Statistics of education: Public examinations: GCSE and GCE in England 1995. London: Author.
DFEE (Department for Education and Employment). (1999). The national curriculum for England. London: Author.
DFEE (Department for Education and Employment). (2001). Statistics of education: National curriculum assessments of 7, 11 and 14-year olds in England, 2000. London: Author.
DFES (Department for Education and Skills). (2001). Statistics of education: Public examinations GCSE/GNVQ and GCE/AGNVQ in England 2000. London: Author.
Elliott, J., Bridges, D., Ebbutt, D., Gibson, R., & Nias, J. (1981). School accountability. London: Grant McIntyre.
Gewirtz S., Ball J., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Gipps C., Brown, M., McCallum, B., & McAlister, S. (1995). Intuition or evidence? Teacher and national assessment of seven-year olds. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hargreaves, D. (1984). Improving secondary schools. London: Inner London Education Authority.
Hillgate Group. (1987). The reform of British education. London: Claridge.
House of Commons. (1999). Education and Employment Select Committee Fourth Report. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Retrieved from www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cml99899/cmselect/cmeduemp/62/6202.htm.
Khattri N., Reeve, A., & Kane, M. (1998). Principles and practices of performance assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kingdon M., & Stobbart G. (1988). GCSE examined. London: Falmer Press.
Linn, R.L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4–16.
MacDonald, B. (1979). Hard times — Accountability in England. Educational Analysis, 1(1), 23–44.
Marks, J. (1991). Standards in schools: Assessment, accountability and the purpose of education. London: Social Market Foundation.
McNess, E., Triggs, P., Broadfoot, P., Osborn, M., & Pollard, A. (2001). The changing nature of assessment in English primary classrooms. Education 3-13, 29(3), 9–16.
Murphy, R. (1986). The emperor has no clothes: Grade criteria and the GCSE. In C. Gipps (Ed.), The GCSE: An uncommon examination. London: Institute of Education Publications.
Murphy, R., & Torrance, H. (1988). The changing face of educational assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Orr, L., & Nuttall, D. (1983). Determining standards in the proposed single system of examining at 16+. London, The Schools Council, Comparability in Examinations: Occasional Paper 2, London.
Osborn, M., McNess, E., Broadfoot, P., Pollard, A., & Triggs, P. (2000). What teachers do: Changing policy and practice in primary education. London: Continuum.
Pollard, A., Broadfoot, P., Croll, P., Osborn, M., & Abbott, A. (1994). Changing English primary schools. London: Cassell.
QCA (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority). (2001). Annual report. Retrieved December 2001 from: www.qca.org.uk/annual_report/resourcing.asp.
Reich, R. (1991). The work of nations. London: Simon & Schuster.
Shepard, L. (1990). Inflated test score gains: Is the problem old norms or teaching to the test? Educational Measurement: Issues and practice, 9(3), 15–22.
TGAT (Task Group on Assessment and Testing). (1987). National curriculum: Task Group on Assessment and Testing: A report. London: DES.
Torrance, H. (1981). The origins and development of mental testing in England and the United States. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2, 45–59.
Torrance, H. (1993). Combining measurement driven instruction with authentic assessment: The case of national assessment in England and Wales. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 81–90.
Torrance, H. (Ed.) (1995). Evaluating authentic assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Wiliam, D. (2001). Reliability, validity and all that jazz. Education 3-13, 29(3), 17–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Torrance, H. (2003). Assessment of the National Curriculum in England. In: Kellaghan, T., Stufflebeam, D.L. (eds) International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Kluwer International Handbooks of Education, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_51
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_51
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0849-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0309-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive