Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Kluwer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 9))

Abstract

Evaluation use1, and remains today, a pressing issue in the evaluation literature. Are evaluations used? Do they make a difference in the decision-making process or at all? If not, why?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 749.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alkin, M.C. (1975). Evaluation: Who needs it? Who cares? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1(3), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkin, M.C. (1985). A guide for evaluation decision makers. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkin, M.C. (1990). Debates on evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkin, M.C., & Coyle, K. (1988). Thoughts on evaluation utilization, misutilization and non-utilization. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 14, 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkin, M.C., Daillak R., & White, P. (1979). Using evaluations: Does evaluation make a difference? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkin, M.C., Hofstetter, C., & Ai, X. (1998). Stakeholder concepts. In A. Reynolds, & H. Walberg (Eds.), Educational productivity. Greenwich, CN: JAI Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkin, M.C., Kosecoff, J., Fitz-Gibbon, C., & Seligman, R. (1974). Evaluation and decision-making: The Title VII experience. Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkin, M.C., & Stetcher, B. (1983). Evaluation in context: Information use in elementary school decision making. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 9, 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braskamp, L.A., Brown, R.D., & Newman, D.L. (1978). The credibility of a local educational program evaluation report: Author source and client audience characteristics. American Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 441–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braskamp, L.A., Brown, R.D., & Newman, D.L. (1982). Studying evaluation utilization through simulations. Evaluation Review, 6(1), 114–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.D., Braskamp, L.A., & Newman, D.L. (1978). Evaluator credibility as a function of report style: Do jargon and data make a difference? Evaluation Quarterly, 2(2), 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.D., & Newman, D.L. (1982). An investigation of the effect of different data presentation formats and order of arguments in a simulated adversary evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4(2), 197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.D., Newman, D.L., & Rivers, L. (1980). Perceived need for evaluation and data usage as influencers on an evaluation’s impact. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2(5), 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24(4), 409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. In P.A. Schipp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper, Vol. 14-I (pp. 413–463). La Salle, IL: Open Court Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N. (1974). The use of social science information by federal executives. In G.M. Lyons (Ed.), Social research and public policies — The Dartmouth/OECD Conference (pp. 46–67). Hanover, NH: Public Affairs Center, Dartmouth College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N., Morrison, A., & Stambaugh, R.J. (1975). The use of social science knowledge in policy decisions at the national level: A report to respondents. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, CA., & Alkin, M.C. (1999). Further reflections on evaluation misutilization. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T.D., & Pollard, W.E. (1977). Guidelines: How to recognize and avoid some common problems of mis-utilization of evaluation research findings. Evaluation, 4, 162–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, J.B. (1995). Asessing program needs using participatory evaluation: A comparison of high and marginal success cases. In J.B. Cousins, & L.M. Earl (Eds.), Participatory evaluation in education: Studies in evaluation use and organizational learning (pp. 55–71). London: Farmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, J.B., & Leithwood, K.A. (1986). Current empirical research on evaluation utilization. Review of Educational Research, 56(3), 331–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, E.T., & Biderman, A.D. (1969). The functions of policy-oriented social science. In E.T. Crawford, & A.D. Biderman (Eds.), Social scientists and international affairs (pp. 233–43). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, L. (2000). Seriously seeking fairness: Strategies for crafting non-partisan evaluations in a partisan world. American Journal of Evaluation, 21(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J.L. (1978). Local uses of Title I evaluation. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, B. (1980). Utilization of evaluations of small scale educational projects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2, 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmert, M.A. (1985). Ordinary knowing and policy science. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 7(1), 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J.G. (1988). Stakeholder participation and utilization in program evaluation. Evaluation Review, 12(2), 91–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J.G. (1990). Technical quality versus user responsiveness in evaluation practice. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13, 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G. (1969). The failure of educational evaluation. Educational Technology, 9(5), 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J.E. (1990). Knowledge and public policy: The search for meaningful indicators (2nd Ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowiz, M. (1970). Political conflict: Essays in political sociology. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M.M. (1983). Working knowledge. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 5(2), 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M.M. (1984). How evidence alters understanding and decisions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6(3), 207–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M., Neumann, W., & Apling, R. (1980). The role of evaluation and testing programs in Title I programs. Cambridge, MA: The Huron Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J.A. (1988). Evaluation use. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 14(3), 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, J.A., & Pechman, E.M. (1982). The process of evaluation use in local school settings (Final Report of NIE Grant 81-0900). New Orleans, LA: Orleans Parish School Board. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 233 037).

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J.A., & Pechman, E.M. (1984). Pinning a wave to the shore: Conceptualizing evaluation use in school systems. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6(3), 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J.A., & Thompson, B. (1983). Research on school use of program evaluation: A literature review and research agenda. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 9, 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkhart, K.E. (2000). Reconceptualizing evaluation use: An integrated theory of influence. In V.J. Caracelli, & H. Preskill (Eds.), The expanding scope of evaluation use. New Directions for Evaluation, 88, 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr, K.D. (1977). Policymakers’ use of social science knowledge: Symbolic or instrumental? In C.H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 165–182). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leviton, L.C., & Hughes, E.F.X. (1981). Research on the utilization of evaluations: A review and synthesis. Evaluation Review, 5(4), 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C., & Cohen, D.K. (1979). Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D.L., Brown, R.D., & Littman, M. (1979). Evaluator report and audience characteristics which influence the impact of evaluation reports: does who say what to whom make a difference? CEDR Quarterly, 12(2), 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J.M., & Lambert, EC. (1995). Roles for evaluation in learning organizations. Evaluation, 1(2), 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J.M., & Rogers, P.J. (1999). Program evaluation: Forms and approaches. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1915). Alternative evaluation research paradigm. North Dakota Study Group on Evaluation Monograph, Center for Teaching and Learning, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1988). Six honest serving men for evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 14, 301–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q., Grimes, P.S., Guthrie, K.M., Brennan, N.J., French, B.D., & Blyth, D.A. (1977). In search of impact: An analysis of the utilization of the federal health evaluation research. In C.H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 141–164). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelz, D.C. (1978). Some expanded perspectives on use of social science in public policy. In J.M. Yinger, & S.J. Cutler (Eds.), Major social issues: A multidisciplinary view. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1966). Of clouds and clocks: An approach to the problem of rationality and the freedom of man. St. Louis, MO: Washington University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preskill, H. (1994). Evaluation’s role in enhancing organizational learning. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17(3), 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preskill, H., & Caracelli, V. (1997). Current and developing conceptions of use: Evaluation Use TIG survey results. Evaluation Practice, 18(3), 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preskill, H., & Torres, R. (1999). Evaluative inquiry for organizational learning. Twin Oaks, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, M., & White, S.H. (1977). Policy research: Belief and doubt. Policy Analysis, 3, 239–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, R. (1975). An Investigation of information gathering and handling in seven federal bureaucracies: A Case study of the Continuous National Survey. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, R.F. (1977). Uses of social science information by federal bureaucrats: Knowledge for action versus knowledge for understanding. In C.H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 199–211). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippey, R.M. (1973). The nature of transactional evaluation. In R.M. Rippey (Ed.), Studies in transactional evaluation. Berkeley: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulha, L.M., & Cousins, J.B. (1997). Evaluation use: Theory, research, and practice since 1986. Evaluation Practice, 18(3), 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C.J., & Dial, M. (1994). What constitutes misuse? In C.J. Stevens, & M. Dial (Eds.), Guiding principals for evaluators. New Directions for Evaluation, 64, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C.H. (1972). Evaluation research: Methods of assessing program effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C.H. (1972). Utilization of evaluation: Toward comparative study. In C.H. Weiss (Ed.), Evaluating action programs: Readings in social action and education (pp. 318–326). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C.H. (Ed.). (1977). Using social research in public policy making. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C.H. (1978). Improving the linkage between social research and public policy. In L.E. Lynn (Ed.), Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection. Washington, D. C: National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C.H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, September/October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C.H. (1980). Knowledge creep and decision acretion. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(3), 381–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C.H. (1988). Evaluation for decisions: Is anybody there? Does anybody care? Evaluation Practice, 9(1), 5-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C.H., & Bucuvalas, M.J. (1977). The challenge of social research in decision making. In C.H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 213–234). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wholey, J.S., & White, B.F. (1973). Evaluation’s impact on Title I elementary and secondary education program management. Evaluation, 1(3), 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, C.J., & Comptois, J. (1979). Increasing congressional utilization of evaluation. In F. Zweig (Ed.), Evaluation in legislation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G. (1981). Institutional structure and organizational processes: The role of evaluation units in schools. In A. Bank, & R. C. Williams (Eds.), Evaluation in school districts: Organizational perspectives (CSE Monograph Series in Evaluation, No. 10). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hofstetter, C.H., Alkin, M.C. (2003). Evaluation Use Revisited. In: Kellaghan, T., Stufflebeam, D.L. (eds) International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Kluwer International Handbooks of Education, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0849-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0309-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics