Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Handbook of Educational Evaluation pp 125–152Cite as

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis as an Evaluation Tool

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Kluwer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 9))

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analysis refers to evaluations that consider both the costs and consequences of alternatives. It is a decision-oriented tool that is designed to ascertain the most efficient means of attaining particular educational goals. For example, there are many alternative approaches for pursuing such goals as raising reading or mathematics achievement. These include the adoption of new materials or curriculum, teacher training, educational television, computer- assisted instruction, smaller class sizes, and so on. It is possible that all of these alternatives, when well-implemented, have a positive effect on student achievement. Often the one that is recommended is the one with the largest apparent effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   749.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Angrist, J., & Lavy, V. (1999). Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 533–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W.S. (1985). Benefit-cost analysis of the Perry Preschool Program and its policy implications. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7(4), 333–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W.S. (1996a). Economics of school reform: Three promising models. In H.F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 299–326). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W.S. (1996b). Lives in the balance: Age-27 benefit-cost analysis of the High/Scope Perry Preschool Program. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W.S., & Escobar, C.M. (1987). The economics of early educational intervention: A review. Review of Educational Research, 57(4), 387–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W.S., Escobar, C.M., & Ravsten, M.T. (1988). Parent and clinic early intervention for children with language handicaps: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 12(4), 290–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartell, E. (1968). Costs and benefits of Catholic elementary and secondary schools. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedi, A.S., & Marshall, J.H. (1999). School attendance and student achievement: Evidence from rural Honduras. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 657–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, J.R. (1996). Is there a link between school inputs and earnings? Fresh scrutiny of an old literature. In G. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success (pp. 141–191). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, S.E. (1998). Measuring the value of better schools. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, S.E. (1999). Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 577–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, A.E., Greenberg, D.H., Vining, A.R., & Weimer, D.L. (1996). Cost-benefit analysis: Concepts and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boruch, R.F. (1997). Randomized experiments for planning and evaluation: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, D.J., Krop, C., Gill, B.P., & Reichardt, R. (1999). Estimating the cost of national class size reductions under different policy alternatives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D., & Krueger, A.B. (1996). Labor market effects of school quality: Theory and evidence. In G. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter?The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, J., & Parrish, T. (1994a). Developing a resource cost database. In W.S. Barnett (Ed.), Cost analysis for education decisions: Methods and examples (Vol. 4, pp. 23–44). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, J., & Parrish, T. (1994b). Modeling resource costs. In W.S. Barnett (Ed.), Cost analysis for education decisions: Methods and examples (Vol. 4, pp. 7–21). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemen, R.T. (1996). Making hard decisions: An introduction to decision analysis (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clune, W.H. (2002). Methodological strength and policy usefulness of cost-effectiveness research. In H.M. Levin & P.J. McEwan (Eds.) Cost-effectiveness and educational policy (pp. 55–68). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field studies. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crone, T.M. (1998). House prices and the quality of public schools? What are we buying? Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, R.G., Brookshire, D.S., & Schultze, W.D. (1986). Valuing environmental goods: An assessment of the contingent valuation method. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalgaard, B.R., Lewis, D.R., & Boyer, CM. (1984). Cost and effectiveness considerations in the use of computer-assisted instruction in economics. Journal of Economic Education, 15(4), 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, M., Torrance, G., & Mason, J. (1993). Cost-effectiveness league tables: More harm than good? Social Science in Medicine, 37(1), 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, M.F., O’Brien, B., Stoddart, G.L., & Torrance, G.W. (1997). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, D.M. (1991). Oregon’s methods: Did cost-effectiveness analysis fail? Journal of the American Medical Association, 266(15), 2135–2141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiserman, W.D., McCoun, M., & Escobar, CM. (1990). A cost-effectiveness analysis of two alternative program models for serving speech-disordered preschoolers. Journal of Early Intervention, 14(4), 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, CM., Barnett, W.S., & Keith, J.E. (1988). A contingent valuation approach to measuring the benefits of preschool education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(1), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J.D., Hawley, D.E., & Piele, P.K. (1990). Costs, effects, and utility of microcomputer assisted instruction in the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 783–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, B., Hua, H., & Snyder, C.W. (1994). When girls learn more than boys: The influence of time in school and pedagogy in Botswana. Comparative Education Review, 38(3), 347–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, K. (1992). Cost-utility in practice: A policy maker’s guide to the state of the art. Health Policy, 21, 249–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glewwe, P. (1999). The economics of school quality investments in developing countries: An empirical study of Ghana. London: St. Martins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, M.R., Patrick, D.L., Torrance, G.W., Fryback, D.G., Hadorn, D.C., Kamlet, M.S., et al. (1996). Identifying and valuing outcomes. In M.R. Gold, L.B. Russell, J.E. Siegel, & M.C Weinstein (Eds.), Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine (pp. 82–134). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, R.W., & Hanushek, E.A. (1992). Educational performance of the poor: Lessons from rural northeast Brazil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, D.T., Mosley, W.H., Measham, A.R., & Bobadilla, J.L. (Eds.). (1993). Disease control priorities in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson, M. (1996). Theory and methods of economic evaluation of health care. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee, M.W. (1989). The economics of safety and risk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.M. (1995). Utility assessment for estimating quality-adjusted life years. In F.A. Sloan (Ed.), Valuing health care: Costs, benefits, and effectiveness of Pharmaceuticals and other medical technologies (pp. 31–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keeler, E.B., & Cretin, S. (1983). Discounting of life-saving and other nonmonetary effects. Management Science, 29, 300–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J.A. (1994). Meeting the educational needs of at-risk students: A cost analysis of three models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 497–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H.M. (1975). Cost-effectiveness in evaluation research. In M. Guttentag & E. Struening (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation research (Vol. 2). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H.M. (1988). Cost-effectiveness and educational policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(1), 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H.M. (1991). Cost-effectiveness at quarter century. In M.W. McLaughlin & D.C. Phillips (Eds.), Evaluation and education at quartery century (pp. 188–209). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H.M. (1995). Cost-effectiveness analysis. In M. Carnoy (Ed.), International encyclopedia of economics of education (2nd ed., pp. 381–386). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H.M. (2002). Issues in designing cost-effectiveness comparisons of whole-school reforms. In H.M. Levin & P.J. McEwan (Eds.), Cost-effectiveness and educational policy (pp. 71–96). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H.M., Glass, G.V., & Meister, G.R. (1987). Cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction. Evaluation Review, 11(1), 50–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H.M., Leitner, D., & Meister, G.R. (1986). Cost-effectiveness of alternative approaches to computer-assisted instruction (87-CERAS-1). Stanford, CA: Center for Educational Research at Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H.M., & McEwan, P.J. (2000). Cost-effectiveness analysis: Methods and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.R. (1989). Use of cost-utility decision models in business education. Journal of Education for Business, 64(6), 275–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.R., Johnson, D.R., Erickson, R.N., & Bruininks, R.H. (1994). Multiattribute evaluation of program alternatives within special education. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 5(1), 77–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.R., & Kallsen, L.A. (1995). Multiattribute evaluations: An aid in reallocation decisions in higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 437–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.R., Stockdill, S.J., & Turner, T.C. (1990). Cost-effectiveness of micro-computers in adult basic reading. Adult Literacy and Basic Education, 14(2), 136–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, R.J., Singer, J.D., & Willett, J.B. (1990). By design: Planning research on higher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipscomb, J., Weinstein, M.C., & Torrance, G.W. (1996). Time preference. In M.R. Gold, L.B. Russell, J.E. Siegel, & M.C. Weinstein (Eds.), Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine (pp. 214–246). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockheed, M.E., & Hanushek, E. (1988). Improving educational efficiency in developing countries: What do we know? Compare, 18(1), 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W.G., Fryback, D.G., & Weinstein, M.C. (1996). Reflecting uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. In M.R. Gold, L.B. Russell, J.E. Siegel, & M.C. Weinstein (Eds.), Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine (pp. 247–275). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, P.J. (2000). The potential impact of large-scale voucher programs. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 103–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, P.J. (2002). Are cost-effectiveness methods used correctly? In H.M. Levin & P.J. McEwan (Eds.), Cost-effectiveness and educational policy (pp. 37–53). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, W.W (1998). Conceptual framework for the analysis of the social benefits of lifelong learning. Education Economics, 6(3), 309–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.C., & Carson, R.T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, D.H., & King, J.A. (1993). Cost analysis as a tool for education reform. In S.L. Jacobson & R. Berne (Eds.), Reforming education: The emerging systemic approach (pp. 131–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrall, J.F. (1986). A review of the record. Regulation, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, L.L. (1999). Social Experiments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, L.L., Bloom, H.S., Bell, S.H., Doolittle, F., Lin, W, & Cave, G. (1996). Does job training for the disadvantaged work?Evidence from the National JTPA Study. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos, G. (1994). Returns to investment in education: A global update. World Development, 22(9), 1325–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, B., Van Mondfrans, A., & Worthen, B.R. (1984). Cost-effectiveness of two math programs as moderated by pupil SES. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6(1), 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J.K. (1997). Cost analysis in education: Paradox and possibility. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(4), 309–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H., & Freeman, H.E. (1993). Evaluation: A systematic approach. (5th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, C.E. (1998). Schools and student achievement: More evidence from the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 4(1), 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint, S., Veenstra, D.L., & Sullivan, S.D. (1999). The use of meta-analysis in cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics, 15(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, F.A., & Conover, C.J. (1995). The use of cost-effectiveness/cost-benefit analysis in actual decision making: Current status and prospects. In F.A. Sloan (Ed.), Valuing health care: Costs, benefits, and effectiveness of pharmaceuticals and other medical technologies (pp. 207–232). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.L., & Glass, G.V. (1987). Research and evaluation in education and the social sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N.L., & Smith, J.K. (1985). State-level evaluation uses of cost analysis: A national descriptive survey. In J.S. Catterall (Ed.), Economic evaluation of public programs (pp. 83–97). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D., Dayton, C., Paik, I.-W, & Weisberg, A. (1989). Benefits and costs of dropout prevention in a high school program combining academic and vocational education: third-year results from replications of the California Peninsula Academies. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(4), 405–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiefel, L., Iatarola, P., Frachter, N., & Berne, R. (1998). The effects of size of student body on school costs and performance in New York City high schools. New York: Institute for Education and Social Policy, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J.-P, Lane, J., & Coustere, P. (1997). Putting inputs to work in elementary schools: What can be done in the Philippines? Economic Development and Cultural Change, 45(4), 857–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, M.C. (1988). Cost analysis for educational policymaking: A review of cost studies in education in developing countries. Review of Educational Research, 58(2), 181–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udvarhelyi, I.S., Colditz, G.A., Rai, A., & Epstein, A.M. (1992). Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses in the medical literature: Are the methods being used correctly? Annals of Internal Medicine, 116, 238–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, K.P. (1992). Fatal trade-offs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W.K. (1995). Discounting health effects for medical decisions. In F.A. Sloan (Ed.), Valuing health care: Costs, benefits, and effectiveness of pharmaceutkals and other medical technologies (pp. 125–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, M.E. (1994). A cost-effectiveness analysis of early intervention services in Massachusetts: implications for policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(1), 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasley, P.A., Fine, M., Gladden, M., Holland, N.E., King, S.P., Mosak, E., & Powell, L. (2000). Small schools: Great strides. New York: Bank Street College of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M.C., Siegel, J.E., Gold, M.R., Kamlet, M.S. & Russell, L.B. (1996). Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276(15), 1253–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C.H. (1998). Evaluation. (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1993). World Development Report 1993: Investing in health. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1996). India: Primary education achievement and challenges (Report No. 15756-IN). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, USA

    Henry M. Levin

  2. Wellesley College, MA, USA

    Patrick J. McEwan

Authors
  1. Henry M. Levin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patrick J. McEwan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Educational Research Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin, Ireland

    Thomas Kellaghan

  2. The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA

    Daniel L. Stufflebeam

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levin, H.M., McEwan, P.J. (2003). Cost-Effectiveness Analysis as an Evaluation Tool. In: Kellaghan, T., Stufflebeam, D.L. (eds) International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Kluwer International Handbooks of Education, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0849-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0309-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation