Abstract
While many authors have lamented the apparent ambiguity of the term, “sustainability”, the idea does have an unquestionable core meaning. Sustainability has to do with concern for the future and with the obligations of earlier generations to steward resources and resource-generating systems for the benefit of the future. This core concern for the future implies that actions in the present may harm people in the future; it also implies that actors in the present can reasonably believe that some of their actions will be harmful - or at least risky - to the future and that other actions can be considered benign. Nobody, of course, can be certain of such judgments - and dealing with uncertainty must therefore be an important part of any planning for the future - but it is also important to acknowledge that a commitment to act to protect the interests of future people entails some ability to identify and evaluate future consequences of present actions. In this essay I set out to sketch an epistemology that is adequate to the challenge of providing a basis for judging current actions to be sustainable or not sustainable, and for addressing the uncertainties that inevitably constrain any attempt at living sustainably.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barber, B.R. (1985). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Dewey, J. (1910). Influence of Darwin on Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Dewey, J. (1988). “Logic: The Theory of Inquiry”, in: The Later Works, Vol. 12, J.A. Boydston (ed.). The collected works of John Dewey. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Flader, S.L. (1974). Thinking Like a Mountain: Aldo Leopold and the Evolution of an Ecological Attitude Toward Deer,Wolves, and Forests. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press.
Gundersen, A.G. (1995). The Environmental Promise of Democratic Deliberation, Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Haas, P.M. (1990). Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hadley, A.T. (1913). Some Influences in Modern Philosophic Thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hoffman, M. (2001). How to Get It. Manuscript delivered at international conference on Model-Based Reasoning, Pavia, Italy.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lee, K. (1993). Compass and Gyroscope. Washington: Island Press.
Leopold, A.S. (1930). “The American Game Policy in a Nutshell”, in: Transactions of the Seventeenth American Game Conference - December 1--2, 1930.
Leopold, A.S. (1939). “A Biotic View of Land”, in: Journal of Forestry 57: 727–730.
Leopold, A.S. (1949). A Sand County Almanac. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Leopold, A.S. (1979). “Some Fundamentals of Conservation in the Southwest”, In: Environmental Ethics 1: 131–141.
Meine, C. (1987). Personal Communication.
Minteer, B.A. (forthcoming), “On Deweyan Democracy and Environmental Ethics”, in: B.P. Taylor and B.A. Minteer (eds.) Democracy and the Claims of Nature: Critical Perspectives for a New Century. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Norton, B.G. (1995). “Ecological integrity and social values: At what scale”, in: Ecosystem Health (1)4: 228–241.
Norton, B.G. and A. Steinemann (2001). “Environmental Values and Adaptive Management”, in: Environmental Values 10: 473–506.
Norton, B.G. (1988). “The constancy of Aldo Leopold’s land ethic”, in: Conservation Biology 2: 93–102.
Norton, B.G. (1990). “Context and hierarchy in Aldo Leopold’s theory of environmental management”, In: Ecological Economics 2: 119–127.
Norton, B.G. (1991). Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press. Quine, W.V. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge: MIT University Press.
Quine. W.V. (1961). “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, in: From A Logical Point of View. New York: Harper and Row.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Norton, B.G. (2002). A Pragmatist Epistemology for Adaptive Management. In: Keulartz, J., Korthals, M., Schermer, M., Swierstra, T. (eds) Pragmatist Ethics for a Technological Culture. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0301-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0301-8_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1115-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0301-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive