Abstract
Building on the work on ethics in educational research in recent publications, we present a framework for ethical practice in mathematics education research. In particular, we discuss what are the implications of claiming or denying a particular piece of research as acceptable within the community. We argue that researchers must be aware for whom they advocate, thus making it count. We present a map with which researchers should engage the ethics of their practice, and we suggest that they must consider whether they are getting the description right.
Keywords
- Mathematics Education
- Educational Research
- Education Research
- Mathematics Education Research
- Mathematics Teacher Education
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adler, J. (1997). A participatory-inquiry approach and the mediation of mathematical knowledge in a multilingual classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 235–258.
Adler, J. (1998a). Resources as a verb: Recontextualising resources in mathematics education. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 1-18). Stellenbosch: University of Stellen-bosch, Faculty of Education.
Adler, J. (Ed.). (1998b). Perspectives on the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Proceedings of a National Seminar, Mathematics Education Development Programme. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
Adler, J. (1999). Redistribution of resources = equity? In J. Kuiper (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 23–32). Harare: University of Harare.
Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(3), 205–224.
Adler, J. (2001a). Re-sourcing practice and equity: A dual challenge for mathematics education. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective (pp. 185–200). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Adler, J. (2001b). Teaching mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Adler, J, Leihott, T., & Slonimsky, L., with Reed, Y., Bapoo, P., Brodie, K., Davis, H, De Wet, H., Dikgomo, P., Nyabanyaba, T., & Setati, M. (1997). A baseline study: Teaching/learning practices of primary and secondary mathematics, science and English language teachers enrolled in the Wits Further Diplomas in Education programme. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Education.
Adler, J., Lelliott, A., & Reed, Y., with Bapoo, P., Brodie, K., Davis, H., De Wet, H., Dikgomo, P., Nyabanyaba, T., Setati, M., & Slonimsky, L. (1998). Mixed-mode FDEs and their effects (Interim Report June 1998). Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Education.
Adler, J., Bapoo, P., Brodie, K., Davis, H., Dikgomo, P., Lelliott, T., Nyabanyaba, T., Reed, Y., Setati, M., & Slonimsky, L. (1999). Mixed-mode Further Diplomas in Education and their effects: Summary report on major findings of a three-year research project. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Education. (Also published in Open Learning Through Distance Education (OLTDE), 6(1), 2000).
Adler, J., & Reed, Y. (2000). Researching teachers’ take-up from a formal in-service professional development programme. Journal of Education, 25,192–226.
Adler, J., & Reed, Y. (Eds.). (2002). Challenges of teacher development: An investigation of take-up in South Africa. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Balacheff, N., & Kaput, J. (1996). Computer-based learning environments in mathematics. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 469–501). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bartolini Bussi, M. G. (1995). Analysis of classroom interaction discourse from a Vygotskian perspective. In L. Meira & D. Carraher (Eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 77–101). Recife: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.
Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research and critique. London: Taylor & Francis.
Brodie, K. (1995). Peer interaction and the development of mathematical knowledge. In L. Meira & D. Carraher (Eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 216–223). Recife: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.
Brodie, K. (1999). Working with pupils’ meanings: Changing practices among teachers enrolled on an in-service course in South Africa. In O. Zaslavsky, (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 145–152). Haifa: Israel Institute of Technology.
Brodie, K. (2000). Mathematics teacher development in under-resourced contexts: A case study. In J.-F. Matos & M. Santos (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (MES2) (pp. 214–223). Lisbon: Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Centro de Investigaçao em Educaçao.
Brodie, K., Lelliott, A., & Davis, H. (2002). Forms and substance in learner-centred teaching: Teachers’ take-up from an in-service programme in South Africa. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(5), 541–559.
Brown, M. (1998). The tyranny of the international horse race. In R. Slee & G. Weiner, with S. Tomlinson (Eds.), School effectiveness for whom? Challenges to the school effectiveness and school improvement movement (pp. 38-48). London: Falmer.
Brown, A., & Dowling, P. (1998). Doing research/reading research: A mode of interrogation for education. London: Falmer.
Cooper, B., & Dunne, M. (2000). Assessing children’s mathematical knowledge: Social class, sex and problem-solving. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Cornbleth, C. (1990). Curriculum in context. London: Falmer.
Graham, A. T., & Thomas, M. (2000). Building a versatile understanding of algebraic variables with a graphic calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(3), 265–282.
Hitchcock, G., & Hughes, D. (1995). Research and the teacher: A qualitative introduction to school-based research (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Howe, K. R., & Moses, M. S. (1999). Ethics in educational research. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 24, pp. 21–59). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Howie, S. (1998). TIMSS in South Africa: The value of international comparative studies for a developing country. In J. Adler (Ed.), Perspectives on the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (Proceedings of a National Seminar, Mathematics Education Development Programme, pp. 22–40). Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
Hoyles, C., & Sutherland, R. (1989). Logo mathematics in the classroom. London: Routledge.
Jones, K. (2000). A regrettable oversight or a significant omission? Ethical considerations in quantitative research in education. In H. Simons & R. Usher (Eds.), Situated ethics in educational research (pp. 147–161). London: Routledge Falmer.
Keitel, C., & Kilpatrick, J. (1999). The rationality and irrationality of international comparative studies. In G. Kaiser, L. Eduardo, & I. Huntley (Eds.), International Comparisons in Mathematics Education (pp. 241–256). London: Falmer.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lerman, S. (1998). A moment in the zoom of a lens: Towards a discursive psychology of mathematics teaching and learning. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-second Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 66-81). Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch, Faculty of Education.
May, W. F. (1980). Doing ethics: The bearing of ethical theories on fieldwork. Social Problems, 27(3), 358–370.
Mwakapenda, W. (2000). Using everyday experiences in teaching secondary mathematics in Malawi-Possibilities and constraints for change. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Deakin University, Melbourne.
Nebres, B. F. (1999). International benchmarking as a way to improve school mathematics achievement in the era of globalisation. In G. Kaiser, L. Eduardo, & I. Huntley (Eds.). International comparisons in mathematics education (pp. 200-212). London: Falmer Press.
Pehkonen, E. (Ed.). (1997). Proceedings of the 21st Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Plenary Panel, Vol. 1, pp. 81-112). Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Teacher Education.
Plomp, T. (1998). Purposes and challenges of international comparative assessments. In J. Adler (Ed.), Perspectives on the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (Proceedings of a National Seminar, Mathematics Education Development Programme, pp. 6–21). Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ruthven, K. (1996). Calculators in the mathematics curriculum: The scope of personal computational technology. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 435–468). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ruthven, K. (1999). The North writes back: North-South dialogue. Perspectives in Education, 18(2), 13-18.
Setati, M. (1998). Chanting and chorusing in mathematics classrooms. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-second Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, p. 304). Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch.
Setati, M., & Adler, J. (2001). Between languages and discourses: Code-switching practices in primary mathematics classrooms in South Africa. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(3), 243–269.
Setati, M., Adler, J., Reed, Y., & Bapoo, A. (2002). Incomplete journeys: Code-switching and other language practices in mathematics, science and English language classrooms in South Africa. Language and Education, 16(2), 128–149.
Sowder, J. T. (1998). Ethics in mathematics education research. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (Vol. 2, pp. 427-442). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Taylor, N., & Vinjevold, P. (1999). Getting learning right. Johannesburg: JET/DoE.
Usher, R. (1996). Textuality and reflexivity in educational research. In D. Scott & R. Usher (Eds.), Understanding educational research (pp. 33–51). London: Routledge.
Valero, P., & Vithal, R. (1999). Research methods of the ’North’ revisited from the ’south’. Perspectives in Education, 18(2), 5–12.
Vithal, R. (2000). In the search for criteria of quality and relevance for mathematics education research: The case of validity. In S. Mahlomaholo (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics and Science Education (SAARMSE) (pp. 567–573). Port Elisabeth: University of Port Elisabeth.
Working Group for Action 11 (WGA11). (2000). Mathematics education and technology. Retrieved October 3, 2002 from http://www.stat.unipg.it/WILMA/sis/199901/msg00080.html.
Wilson, S., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 24, pp. 173–209). Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adler, J., Lerman, S. (2003). Getting the Description Right and Making It Count: Ethical Practice in Mathematics Education Research. In: Bishop, A.J., Clements, M.A., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Leung, F.K.S. (eds) Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3951-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0273-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive