Subjective Quality of Life: The Affective Dimension

  • Paul Bramston
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 16)

Abstract

Subjective quality of life has attracted increasing research interest over recent decades but more often than not authors complain of a lack of clarity and consensus over definitions, terminology and theoretical models. Such disagreement is slowing progress and development in the field Spurred on by the lack of consensus, this chapter firstly reviews the characteristics of subjective quality of life on which there is some agreement. This is followed by examination of the role that cognitions and emotion are considered to play in subjective quality of life judgements. In this regard, there is evidence that cognitions play a major role in most judgements. Likewise, emotions appear to play an integral part, but this role has yet to be adequately explored in the literature. In order to address this deficit, definitions of emotion and mood are reviewed, followed by discussion of the possible role of emotion in subjective quality of life judgements. It is proposed that emotion and mood, along with cognitions and personality, help to shape perceptions of quality of life.

Keywords

Obesity Depression Income Beach Posit 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, F.M. (1991). Stability and change in levels and structure of subjective well-being. USA 1972 and 1988. Social Indicators Research, 25, 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, F.M., & Robinson, J.P. (1991). Measures of subjective well-being.In J.P.Robinson &L S.Wrightsman (Eds.),Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp 61–114).New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, F M, & Withey, S.B. (1976) Social indicators of well-being America’s perception of life quality. New York: Plenum PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  5. Best, C.J., Cummins, R.A., & Lo, S.K (2000). The quality of rural and metropolitan life. Australian Journal of Psychology, 52, 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bower, G.H. (1981). Mood and memory American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.Google Scholar
  7. Bramston, P., & Cummins, R.A. (1998). Stress and the move into community accommodation. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 23, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bramston, P., & Tomasevic, V (2001). Health locus of control, depression and quality of life in people who are elderly. Australian Journal on Ageing, 20, 192–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bramston, P., Pretty, G, & Chipuer, H. Unravelling subjective quality of life: An investigation of individual and community determinants. Social Indicators Research (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
  10. Carver, C.S, & Scheier, M.F. (1998) On the self-regulation of behavior New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costa, P T., & McCrae, R.R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 853–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummins, R A (1999). Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model. In B.Zumbo (Ed.), Methodological developments and issues in quality of life research. Amsterdam Kluwar (in press).Google Scholar
  13. Cummins, R.A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life’ An interactive model Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72.Google Scholar
  14. Cummins, R.A, & Cahill, J. (2000). Progress in understanding subjective quality of life. Intervention Psisocial: Revista Sobre Igualdad y Calidad De Vida, 9, 185–198Google Scholar
  15. Cummins, R.A., McCabe, M.P., Gullone, E., & Romeo, Y. (1994) The Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale: instrument development and psychometric evaluation on tertiary staff and students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 372–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeNeve, K.M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7,181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1997). Social comparisons and subjective well-being. In B.Buunk & R Gibbons (Eds.), Health, coping and social comparison (pp. 329–357). Mahwah, Nj:Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Diener, E., & Larsen, R J. (1984). Temporal stability and cross-situational consistency of affective, behavioural, and cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 871–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., & Lucas, R E (2000) Subjective emotional well-being In M.Lewis, & J.M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2n¡ã ed., pp 325–337). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Diener, E, Nickerson, C., Lucas, R.E., & Sandvik, E. (2000). Income and happiness Does subjective well-being predict future income? Paper submitted for publication. University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  24. Diener, E., Sandvik, E, & Pavot, W. (1991). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. In F.Strack, M.Argyle, N.Schwarz (Eds), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective. International series in experimental social psychology, Vol 21. (pp. 119–139). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Diener, E., Suh, E.M, Lucas, R.E., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress- 1967–1997. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 1967–1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dreikurs Ferguson, E. (2000). Motivation: A biosocial and cognitive integration of motivation and emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Eid, M, & Diener, E (in press). Global judgements of subjective well-being: Situational variability and long-term stability. Annual Review of Quality of Life Methods.Google Scholar
  28. Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotions, 6, 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ekman, P., Levensen, R W, & Friesen, W.V. (1983). Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes between emotions. Science, 221, 1208–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Estrada, C.A., Isen, A.M., & Young, M.J. (1994). Positive affect improves creative problem solving and influences reported source of practice satisfaction in physicians. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 285–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Feist, G.J., Bodner, T.E., Jacobs, J.F, Miles, M., & Tan, V (1995). Integrating top-down and bottom-up structural models of subjective well-being: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 138–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fiedler, K. & Forgas, J. (1987). Affect, cognition and social behavior. Toronto Hogrefs.Google Scholar
  33. Folkman, S. (1997). Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress. Social Science Medicine, 45, 1207–1221.Google Scholar
  34. Frederickson, B.L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions American Psychologist, 56, 218–226Google Scholar
  35. Frijda, N.H. (1999). Emotions and hedonic experience. In D.Kahneman, E. Diener, & N.Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 190–210). New York Russell Sage FoundationGoogle Scholar
  36. Frijda, N.H., Kuipers, P, & Schure, E. (1989) Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–228.Google Scholar
  37. Green, D.P., Goldman, S.L., & Salovey, P. (1993). Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1029–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Headey, B., & Wearing, A (1989). Personality, life events and subjective well-being. Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Larsen, R J., & Diener, E. (1987). Emotional response intensity as an individual difference characteristic. Journal of Research in Personality, 21,1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Larsen, R.J., Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Emotion, Vol 13, (pp. 25–59). Newburry Park, CA Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Lazarus, R S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Levenson, R.W. (1992) Autonomic nervous system differences among emotions. Psychological Science, 3, 23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lucas, R.E., Diener, E., & Larsen, R.J. (2002). Handbook of positive psychological assessment. (in press) American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  44. Lucas, R.E., Diener, E., & Suh, E.M. (1996). Discriminant validity of subjective well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Why are some people happier than others’ The role of cognitive and motivational processes in well-being. American Psychologist, 56, 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lyubomirsky, S., Lepper, H.S, & Giordani, P. (2001). What are the differences between happiness and self-esteem? Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  47. Magnus, K.B, Diener, E., Fujita, F., & Pavot, W. (1993) Extraversion and neuroticism as predictors of objective life events: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 316–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. (1986). Personality, coping, and coping effectiveness in an adult sample. Journal of Personality, 54, 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Morris, W.N. (1999). The mood system. In D.Kahneman, E. Diener, & N.Schwarz (Eds), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 169–189). New York: Russell sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  50. Myers, D.G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Redelmeier, D., & Kahneman, D. (1996). Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures, Pain, 116, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Russell, J.A., & Feldman Barrett, L.F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 805–819. •CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sandvik, E., Diener, E., & Seidlitz, L. (1993) Subjective well-being: The convergence and stability of self-report and non-self-report measures. Journal of Personality, 61, 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schachter, S (1967). Cognitive effects on bodily functioning Studies of obesity and eating In D.C. Glass (Ed.), Neurophysiology and emotion (pp. 117–144) New York: Rockefeller University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Scheier, M.F., & Carver, C.S. (1993). On the power of positive thinking: The benefits of being optimistic. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schimmack, U, & Grob, A. (2000) Dimensional models of core affect: A quantitative comparison by means of structural equation modeling. European Journal of Personality, 14, 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Terry, P. (2001). Mood and emotions in sport In T.Morris & J.Summers (Eds.), Sport psychology: Theory, applications and issues. Brisbane: Wiley.Google Scholar
  58. Tversky, A., & Griffin, D.(1991) Endowment and contrast in judgments of well-being In F.Strack &M Argyle(Eds.),Subjective well-being An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 101–118).Oxford, England: Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
  59. Watson, D., & Clark, L.A. (1984).Negative affectivity.The disposition to experience negative affective states.Psychological Bulletin,96,465–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Watson, D, Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,76,820–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Bramston
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of PsychologyUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia

Personalised recommendations