Advertisement

Funding of the Essential Synergy Between Small and Large Telescopes

  • Wm. Bruce Weaver
Chapter
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Library book series (ASSL, volume 287/8/9)

Abstract

Since the 1956 Flower and Cook Symposium on the future of moderate-sized telescopes, such telescopes have contributed a substantial fraction of the important scientific results in astronomy. In addition, some of the significant science and discoveries produced by astronomers at large telescopes could have been made at smaller instruments at that time. When considered on a per dollar basis, the scientific productivity of smaller telescopes dominates the field Some small telescope myths, such as “small telescopes are best dedicated to large survey projects” are examined If “goodness” of science is defined in any terms other than its cost, smaller telescopes easily hold their own. Astronomy has a history of an essential synergy between small and large telescopes. This synergy can be maintained only if there are a reasonable number of well-maintained, well-instrumented smaller-sized telescopes. Recommendations for a small telescope budget and a refurbishment of the Schmidt telescopes at the national observatories are made. Two percent of the Astronomy and Astrophysics Survey Committee decadal budget would provide well-instrumented facilities to the same number of astronomers who use the existing or approved large ground-based optical and infrared telescopes and add 50% to the amount of quality astronomy produced.

research productivity small telescopes large telescopes decadal survey 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abt, H. 1980, PASP, 92, 249.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abt, H. 1985, PASP, 97, 1050.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abt, H. 1996, PASP, 108, 1059.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abt, H. ed. 1999 The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society Centennial Issue (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  5. Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Irwin, M, von Rippel, T. 1998, MNRAS 298, 361.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrado y Navascués et al., 2001 Ap.J. Sup., 134, 103.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baum, W.A 1962 Stars and Stellar Systems. Volume 2. Astronomical Techniques (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  8. Chandrasekhar, S. 1970, Ap.J. 162, L77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Croom, S.M. 2001 MNRAS 322, L29ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deeg, H.J. & Ninkov, Z. 1996 A&A Supl. 119, 221.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dufton, P.L., Smartt, S.J., Hambly, N.C. 2001 A&A, 373, 608.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferrin, I. et al., 2001, Ap.J. 548, L243.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fry, A, Morrrison, H., Harding, P., Boroson, T. 1999, A.J. 118, 1209.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greestein, J.L. & Sargent, A. 1974 Ap.J. Sup., 28, 157.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, H. & Stephenson, C.B. 1966, Ap.J. 146, 602.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Melsheimer, F. 2001, private communication.Google Scholar
  17. Mould, J. 2001, quoted in NOAO Newsletter June, 13.Google Scholar
  18. Meusinger, H. & Brunzendorf, J. 2001 A&A, 374, 878.Google Scholar
  19. Naef, D. et al. 2001 A&A, 375, 205.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paczynski, B. 1986, Ap.J. 304, 1.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Percy, J. 1980, JRASC, 74, 334.ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Ringwald, F.A., et al. 2001, BAAS, 32, 1428.ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. Robinson, L.J. 1980, Sky & Tel., 59, 469.ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. Sandage, A.R. et al 1966, Ap.J. 146, 316.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salzer, J.J. 2000, A.J., 120, 80.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Trimble, V. 1995, PASP, 107,977.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Torres-Dodgen, A. V. & Weaver, W.B. 1993, PASP, 105, 693.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weaver, Wm. B. & Torres-Dodgen, A. V. 1997, ApJ, 487, 847ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wood, F.B., ed. 1958, The Present and Future of the Telescope of Moderate Size (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).Google Scholar
  30. Zwicky, F. 1957, Morphological Astronomy (Berlin: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wm. Bruce Weaver
    • 1
  1. 1.Monterey Institute for Research in AstronomyMarinaUSA

Personalised recommendations