Skip to main content

Time in Biology and Physics

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series ((NAII,volume 95))

Abstract

Traditionally, time has been modelled as a basic variable taking its values from an interval on a real axis. Although special relativity introduced Lorentz transformations mixing rectilinear time and space axes, while general relativity introduced curved spacetimes, the concept of a single underlying time dimension parametrised by a real interval remained. The pervasiveness of this concept was certainly due in large measure to the success of the models it supported, in particular to the expression of physical laws by differential equations which ultimately relied on the limiting process inherent in the notion of a (total or partial) derivativc. Despite this success at the computational level, it has long been clear that the truly ramified nature of time cannot be captured by what amounts to a mathematical convention. The current paper sets out to recall some of the perspectives on time and space that have been emerging from the study of biology and complex systems. Although these examples are still rather isolated and underdeveloped, they are already leading to some new insights. Summarising briefly, it is becoming apparent that each part of a complex system is equipped with its own intrinsic spacetime. When the system functions, the spacetimes of its constituent parts interact in various ways. As biological systems are able to insulate their component parts from environmental influences to a greater or lesser extent, one may propose an answer to Schrödinger’s question “What is life?” [1], characterising biological systems as those systems complex enough to isolate their component spacetimes. By contrast, the success of the single traditional “universal,” “clock,” or “calendar” time in physics is seen to be due to the way in which the component spacetimes of low-level systems are mutually coupled. This presents a different approach to universal time. Rather than being built in to our models ab initio, universal time should be seen as a phenomenon that emerges from the closely coupled interactions of low-level components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Schrödinger, E. (1945) What is Life?, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gruber, R.P., Wagner, L.F. and Block, H.A. (2000) Subjective time versus proper (clock) time, in R. Buccheri, V. Di Gesù and M. Saniga (eds.), Studies on the Structure of Time: From Physics to Psycho (patho)logy, Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, pp. 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hanke, W. (2000) The perception of time, in R. Buccheri, V. Di Gesù and M. Saniga (eds.), Studies on the Structure of Time: From Physics to Psycho(patho)logy, Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, pp. 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pöppel, E. (1988) Mindworks: Time and Conscious Experience, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Saniga, M. (2000) Algebraic geometry: a tool for resolving the enigma of time?, in R. Buccheri, V. Di Gesù and M. Saniga (eds.), Studies on the Structure of Time: From Physics to Psycho(patho)logy, Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, pp. 137–166.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eigen, M. (1971) Self-organization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules, Naturwissenschaften 58, 465–523.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones, B.L., Enns, R.H. and Rangnekar, S.S. (1976) On the theory of selection of coupled macromolecular systems, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 38, 15–28.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson, C.J. and McBride, J.L. (1974) On Eigen’s theory of the self-organization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules, Mathematical Biosciences 21, 127–142.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, J.D.H. (1996) Competition and the canonical ensemble, Mathematical Biosciences 133, 69–83.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith, J.D.H. (1998) Canonical ensembles, evolution of competing species, and the arrow of time, in G. van de Vijver, S.N. Salthe and M. Delpos (eds.), Evo-lutionary Systems: Biological and Epistemological Perspectives on Selection and S elf-organization, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, J.D.H. (2000) Competition and the quantum canonical ensemble, ISU Department of Mathematics Report No. 00–05.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Backman, G. (1940) Lebensdauer und Entwicklung, Archiv für Entwick-lungsmechanik 140, 90–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984) Why is Ammal Size so Important?, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Andresen, B., Shiner, J.S. and Uehliger, D.E. (2002) Allometric scaling and maximum efficiency in physiological eigen time, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 99, 5822–5824.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Prigogine, I. (1947) Etude Thermodynamique des Phénomènes Irréversibles, Dunod, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keyfitz, N. and Flieger, W. (1990) World Population Growth and Aging, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith, J.D.H. (1999) A macroscopic approach to demography, ISU Applied Mathematics Report No. AM99-05.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, J.D.H. (2000) Time in biological systems, in R. Buccheri, V. Di Gesù and M. Saniga (eds.), Studies on the Structure of Time: From Physics to Psycho(patho)logy, Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, pp. 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leven, R.W., Koch, B.-P. and Pompe, B. (1989) Chaos in Dissipativen Systemen, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, J.D.H. (1999) Wreath products along the period-doubling route to chaos, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 19, 1617–1636.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Dekker, J., Dekker, B., Hilhorst, H. and Karssen, C. (1996) Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp. IV. Changes in the germinative capacity of S. Faberii (Poaceae) embryos with development from anthesis to after abscission, American Journal of Botany 83, 979–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stuckey, M. (2000) Pregeometry and the trans-temporal object, in R. Buccheri, V. Di Gesù and M. Saniga (eds.), Studies on the Structure of Time: From Physics to Psycho(patho)logy, Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, pp. 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stevenson, W.D. (1982) Elements of Power System Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smith, J.D.H. (1999) On the evolution of semiotic capacity, in E. Taborsky (ed.), Semiotics, Evolution, Energy, Shaker Verlag, Aachen, pp. 283–309.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hameroff, S. (2003) Time, consciousness and quantum events in fundamental spacetime geometry, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reznikova, Zh.I. and Ryabko, B.Ya. (2000) Using information theory approach to study the communication system and numerical competence in ants, in J.-A. Meyer, A. Berthoz, D. Floreano, H.L. Roitblat and S.W. Wilson (eds.), From Animals to Animats 6. Proceeding of the Sixth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 501–506.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mayburov, S. (2003), private communication.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, J.D.H. (2003). Time in Biology and Physics. In: Buccheri, R., Saniga, M., Stuckey, W.M. (eds) The Nature of Time: Geometry, Physics and Perception. NATO Science Series, vol 95. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0155-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0155-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1201-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0155-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics