Abstract
CETP’s relationship with the Alliance for Global Sustainability (AGS) implies that sustainability is a basic concern of the project’s scenarios assessment process. Because sustainability is by nature a multidimensional concept, it requires the use of methodological approaches specifically designed to tackle decision-making problems of this type. Such a methodology should encompass multiple criteria, including economic, social and environmental issues, under sustainability constraints, and produce results that are transparent and easy for different stakeholders to understand.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Belton V., Pictet J. (1997) A Framework for Group Decision Using a MCDA Model, Journal of Decision Systems 6 (3).
Brundtland, G.H. (1989) Global Change and our Common Future, Benjamin Franklin Lecture, Environment, Vol. 31, Washington D.C.
Haldi, P.-A. et al. (2002) Multi-criteria/multi-stakeholders comparative assessment of electricity generation scenarios in the sustainability context: a Swiss case study, International Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 5, Nos.1/2, Published by Interscience Enterprises Ltd., Oxford.
Maystre L.Y., Pictet J., Simos J. (1994) Méthodes multicritéres Electre: description, conseils pratiques et cas d’application à la gestion environnementale, Presse polytechniques et universitaires romandes, Lausanne.
Pictet J, and Belton V. (2000) ACIDE: Analyse de la compensation et de l’incomparabilité dans la décision, in AMCD - Aide multicritére à la décision (Multiple criteria decision aiding), edited by Colorni A., Paruccini M. and Roy B., Joint research centre, EUR report 19808 EN, The European Commission.
Pictet J., Maystre L.Y. and Simos J. (1994) Surmesure. An instrument for presentation of results obtained by methods of the Electre and Promethee families, in Applying multiple criteria aid for decision to environmental management, edited by Paruccini M., Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Roy B. (1978) Electre III: Un algorithme de classement fondé sur une représentation floue des préférences en présence de critéres multiples, Cahiers du CERO 20.
Roy B. (1985) Méthodologie multicritére d’aide à la décision, Economica, collection « Gestion », Paris (English version : Roy B. (1996) Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding, Kluwer, Dordrecht).
Roy B. and Bouyssou D. (1993) Aide multicritére d’aide à la décision : Méthodes et cas, Economica, collection « Gestion », Paris.
Schärlig A. (1985) Décider sur plusieurs critéres. Panorama de l’aide à la décision multicritére, Presses Polytechniques Romandes, Lausanne.
SESAMS (2000) Strategic Electric Sector Assessment Methodology Under Sustainability Conditions, Final Research Report for the AGS SESAMS Project 1988-1999, MIT, Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology.
UNDP (2000) World Energy Assessment, United Nations Development Program, Bureau for Development Policy, New York.
Zaddeh L. (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haldi, P.A., Pictet, J. (2003). Multicriteria Output Integration Analysis. In: Eliasson, B., Lee, Y.Y. (eds) Integrated Assessment of Sustainable Energy Systems in China The China Energy Technology Program. Alliance for Global Sustainability Bookseries, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0153-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0153-3_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1199-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0153-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive