Skip to main content

Analysis of the Concept of Number in Terms of its Origin and Content

  • Chapter
Philosophy of Arithmetic

Part of the book series: Edmund Husserl ((HUCO,volume 10))

  • 1153 Accesses

Abstract

Now that we have established the ‘psychological’ nature of the collective combination, we can bring to completion our task of exhibiting the origin and content of the concepts multiplicity and cardinal number, and those of the individual numbers as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Metaphysik, Leipzig 1879, pp. 530/31

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tonpsychologie, Book I, p. 96

    Google Scholar 

  3. James Mill assigns the name “cardinal number” to that category of names which he calls “names of names.” (Cp. Analysis, Vol. II, p. 4) This is a highly inappropriate manner of expression. “Cardinal number” did not arise as a general name for the names “two,” “three,” etc., but rather for the concepts designated by means of them, whose inherent kinship offered the reason and the occasion for a common term.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cp. E. B. Tylor, Primitive Culture, Vol. I, ch. 7, “The Art of Counting,” London 1871, p. 240, and J. Lubbock, The Origin of Civilization and the Primitive Condition of Man, London 1870. LE

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Anima, Book II, ch. 6, p. 418, a 16; Book III, ch. 1, p. 425, a 13; etc. (Becker edition, Berlin 1831). Cp. Fr. Brentano, Die Psychologie des Aristoteles, Mainz 1867, p. 83. Leibniz, among others, also followed Aristotle. See his Meditationes de cogitatione, veritate et ideis (1684), Opera philosophica, ed. Erdmann, p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Essay, Book II, ch. VII, sect. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Essay, Book II, ch. VIII, sects. 11, 17, etc. Cp. the critique of Baumann’s views in chapter two of this present work.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chr. Sigwart, Logik, First edition, Vol. II, Freiburg i. Br. 1878, p. 39 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Logik, Vol. I, Stuttgart 1880, p. 468.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Op. cit., p. 469. LE

    Google Scholar 

  12. Op. cit., p. 470. LE

    Google Scholar 

  13. “The number as a combination of units is first of all the positive number and … whole number.” Op. cit., p. 469.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Op. cit., pp. 470f. LE

    Google Scholar 

  15. Op. cit., p. 468.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Husserl, E. (2003). Analysis of the Concept of Number in Terms of its Origin and Content. In: Philosophy of Arithmetic. Edmund Husserl, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0060-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0060-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1603-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0060-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics