Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Sovietica ((SOVA,volume 40))

Abstract

When the recent Soviet discussions of ethics are examined from the perspective of the history of ethical theory as a whole, one of their more interesting general characteristics can be easily discerned: the framework and terms of these discussions, the problems posed, and the approaches taken toward their solution are remarkably similar to those of the ‘social utilitarian’ doctrines of the eighteenth century French Enlightenment. This is not so surprising when one remembers that Marx himself frequently drew attention to the doctrines of the ‘French materialists’, and more particularly, that Plekhanov wrote extensively on the eighteenth century French materialists. Russians who learned their Marxism through Plekhanov could scarcely fail to be highly conscious of these writers, even forgetting the special fascination which the Philosophes held for the nineteenth century Russian ‘intelligenty’. One of the earliest Soviet works on the history of ethical theory was an article on the‘ social ethics’ of Morelly and Mably, by a student of Deborin.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. I. Luppol, ‘Social’naja etika Mabli i Morelli’ (The Social Ethics of Mably and Morelly), Trudy Instituta Krasnoj Professury, vol. 1, pp. 42–58 (Giz., 1923).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. A. Kamysan, ‘Ob ob’ektivnom kriterii nravstvennogo progressa’ (On an Objective Criterion of Moral Progress), Filosofskie nauki 1962, 5, 90–97.

    Google Scholar 

  3. For an excellent survey of ethical thought in the French Enlightenment, see L. G. Crocker, An Age of Crisis (Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press, 1959)

    Google Scholar 

  4. idem, Nature and Culture: Ethical Thought in the French Enlightenment (Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Helvetius, De l’Esprit, quoted in Crocker, Nature and Culture, p. 263.

    Google Scholar 

  6. La Mettrie, Discours sur le bonheur, Oeuvres (Paris, Charles Tutot, 1796), p. 171; quoted in Crocker, Nature and Culture, p. 259.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See below pp. 143-46.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sogomonov, Dobro i zio (Good and Evil), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Mably, De la superstition’, quoted in Crocker, Nature and Culture, p. 479.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Helvetius, De l’Homme, quoted in Charles Frankel, The Faith of Reason (New York, King’s Crown Press, 1948), p. 58, ftnt. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Mably, Principes de Morale, Oeuvres, vol. X; quoted in Crocker, Nature and Culture, p. 479.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crocker, ibid. p. 480.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid. p. 463.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. F. Petrov, Egoizm: filosofsko-etičeskij očerk (Egoism: a Philosophico-Ethical Essay), (Moscow, ‘Nauka’, 1969), pp. 60–61.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid. p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid. p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. M. Gak, ‘Obščestvennye i ličnye interesy i ix otnosenija pri socializme’ (Social and Individual Interests and their Relations Under Socialism), Voprosy filosofa 1955, 4, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Drobnickij, in Xarcev, ed., Problema cennosti, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  19. I. S. Kon, Sociologia ličnosti (Sociology of the Individual), (Moscow, Izd. politiceskoj literatury, 1967), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. D. Parygin, SociaVnaja psixologija kak nauka (Social Psychology as a Science), (Leningrad, Izd. Leningradskogo universiteta, 1965), p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xarcev and Jakovlev, pp. 194-95.

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. M. Egides, ‘Marksistskaja etika o smysle žizni’ (Marxist Ethics on the Meaning of Life), Voprosy filosofii 1963, 8; and G. K. Gumnickij,’ smysl žizni, scast’e, moral” (The Meaning of Life, Happiness, Morality), Voprosy filosofii 1967, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xarcev and Jakovlev, p. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kon, Sociologija licnosti, p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See above pp. 56-57.

    Google Scholar 

  26. The phrase is Gustav Wetter’s, quoted by N. Lobkowicz, ‘Materialism and Matter in Marxism-Leninism’ in Ernan McMullin, ed., The Concept of Matter, p. 463.

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. M. Gak, ‘Obščestvennye i ličnye interesy i ix otnošenija pri socializme’, Voprosy filosofii 1955,4.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid. p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Loc. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid. p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid. p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibid. p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. G. Zdravomyslov, Problema interesa v sociologiceskoj teorii (The Problem of Interest in Sociological Theory), (Leningrad, Izd. Leningradskogo universiteta, 1964). See A. Ajzikovič, ‘Obščestvennye interesy’ (Social Interests), in Filosofskaja enciklopedija vol. 4, pp. 116-17.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid. p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ibid. p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid. p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ibid. pp. 29-30.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ibid. p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ibid. p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  40. H. B. Acton, The Illusion of the Epoch (London, Cohen and West, Ltd., 1955), pp. 112–113.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ibid. pp. 189-90.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Drobnickij and Kon, eds., Slovar’ po etike, ‘Dolg’ (Duty), p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid. pp.78-79.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid. p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  45. E. V. Sokolov, Nravstvennyj dolg i ego rol’ v obščestvennoj žizni (aftoreferat) (Moral Duty and its Role in Social Life — Author’s Summary), (Leningrad, 1964), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Loc. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  47. Loc. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ibid. pp. 14-15.

    Google Scholar 

  49. L. V. Konovalova, ‘Dolg — central’naja kategorija etiki’ (Duty — the Central Category of Ethics), in Problemy kategorij marksistsko-leninskoj etiki, p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Loc. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  51. Bandzeladze, Etika, 2nd ed., pp. 216f.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ibid. pp. 209-16.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ibid. p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ibid. p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Loc. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ibid. p. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid. pp. 228-29.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ibid. p. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ibid. pp. 229-30.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ibid. p. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ibid. pp. 237-42.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Drobnickij and Kon, eds., Slovar’ po etike, ‘Otvetstvennost’ (Responsibility), p. 214.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ibid. p.215.

    Google Scholar 

  64. For Sogomonov’s argument, see above pp. 131-32.

    Google Scholar 

  65. See for example, A. F. Plaxotnyj,’ struktura i formy social’noj otvetstvennosti’ (The Structure and Forms of Social Responsibility), in Problemy kategorij marksistsko-leninskoj etiki, pp. 182-86; and A. I. Orexovskij, ‘O strukture kategorii otvetstvennosti’ (On the Structure of the Category of Responsibility), ibid. pp. 192-97.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Plaxotnyj, pp. 182-83.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ibid. p. 183.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ibid. p. 185.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Loc. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  70. V. E. Dolja, ‘Kategorija svobody voli v etike’ (The Category of Freedom of the Will in Ethics), ibid. p. 200.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ibid. pp. 200-01.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Drobnickij and Kon, Slovar’ po etike,’ svoboda nravstvennaja’ (Moral Freedom), p. 280.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Loc. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ibid. pp. 280-81.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Siskin, Osnovy marksistskoj etiki (Foundations of Marxist Ethics), p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Loc. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ibid. p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  78. F. G. Barghoorn, Soviet Russian Nationalism (New York, Oxford University Press, 1956), pp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  79. P. Stucka, Tatriotizm’ (Patriotism), in the Enciklopedija gosudarstva i prava (Encyclopedia of the State and Law), (Moscow, 1926-1927, 3 vols.), vol. 3, pp. 252–254; quoted in Barghoorn, loc. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  80. Barghoorn, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Loc. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  82. For a detailed discussion of the Moral Code for the Builders of Communism, see R. T. DeGeorge, Soviet Ethics and Morality (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor Paperbacks, 1969). For the phrase quoted, see p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  83. SiSkin, Osnovy marksistskoj etike, pp. 277 and 263.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Ibid. p. 259.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Ibid. p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ibid. p. 266.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Ibid. p. 273.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Bandzeladze, Etika, 2nd ed., p. 358.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Ibid. pp. 362-63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grier, P.T. (1978). Society and the Individual. In: Marxist Ethical Theory in the Soviet Union. Sovietica, vol 40. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9876-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9876-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9878-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9876-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics