Abstract
When the recent Soviet discussions of ethics are examined from the perspective of the history of ethical theory as a whole, one of their more interesting general characteristics can be easily discerned: the framework and terms of these discussions, the problems posed, and the approaches taken toward their solution are remarkably similar to those of the ‘social utilitarian’ doctrines of the eighteenth century French Enlightenment. This is not so surprising when one remembers that Marx himself frequently drew attention to the doctrines of the ‘French materialists’, and more particularly, that Plekhanov wrote extensively on the eighteenth century French materialists. Russians who learned their Marxism through Plekhanov could scarcely fail to be highly conscious of these writers, even forgetting the special fascination which the Philosophes held for the nineteenth century Russian ‘intelligenty’. One of the earliest Soviet works on the history of ethical theory was an article on the‘ social ethics’ of Morelly and Mably, by a student of Deborin.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
I. Luppol, ‘Social’naja etika Mabli i Morelli’ (The Social Ethics of Mably and Morelly), Trudy Instituta Krasnoj Professury, vol. 1, pp. 42–58 (Giz., 1923).
M. A. Kamysan, ‘Ob ob’ektivnom kriterii nravstvennogo progressa’ (On an Objective Criterion of Moral Progress), Filosofskie nauki 1962, 5, 90–97.
For an excellent survey of ethical thought in the French Enlightenment, see L. G. Crocker, An Age of Crisis (Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press, 1959)
idem, Nature and Culture: Ethical Thought in the French Enlightenment (Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press, 1964).
Helvetius, De l’Esprit, quoted in Crocker, Nature and Culture, p. 263.
La Mettrie, Discours sur le bonheur, Oeuvres (Paris, Charles Tutot, 1796), p. 171; quoted in Crocker, Nature and Culture, p. 259.
See below pp. 143-46.
Sogomonov, Dobro i zio (Good and Evil), p. 45.
De Mably, De la superstition’, quoted in Crocker, Nature and Culture, p. 479.
Helvetius, De l’Homme, quoted in Charles Frankel, The Faith of Reason (New York, King’s Crown Press, 1948), p. 58, ftnt. 4.
De Mably, Principes de Morale, Oeuvres, vol. X; quoted in Crocker, Nature and Culture, p. 479.
Crocker, ibid. p. 480.
Ibid. p. 463.
E. F. Petrov, Egoizm: filosofsko-etičeskij očerk (Egoism: a Philosophico-Ethical Essay), (Moscow, ‘Nauka’, 1969), pp. 60–61.
Ibid. p. 49.
Ibid. p. 196.
G. M. Gak, ‘Obščestvennye i ličnye interesy i ix otnosenija pri socializme’ (Social and Individual Interests and their Relations Under Socialism), Voprosy filosofa 1955, 4, 21.
Drobnickij, in Xarcev, ed., Problema cennosti, p. 33.
I. S. Kon, Sociologia ličnosti (Sociology of the Individual), (Moscow, Izd. politiceskoj literatury, 1967), p. 9.
B. D. Parygin, SociaVnaja psixologija kak nauka (Social Psychology as a Science), (Leningrad, Izd. Leningradskogo universiteta, 1965), p. 117.
Xarcev and Jakovlev, pp. 194-95.
P. M. Egides, ‘Marksistskaja etika o smysle žizni’ (Marxist Ethics on the Meaning of Life), Voprosy filosofii 1963, 8; and G. K. Gumnickij,’ smysl žizni, scast’e, moral” (The Meaning of Life, Happiness, Morality), Voprosy filosofii 1967, 5.
Xarcev and Jakovlev, p. 195.
Kon, Sociologija licnosti, p. 94.
See above pp. 56-57.
The phrase is Gustav Wetter’s, quoted by N. Lobkowicz, ‘Materialism and Matter in Marxism-Leninism’ in Ernan McMullin, ed., The Concept of Matter, p. 463.
G. M. Gak, ‘Obščestvennye i ličnye interesy i ix otnošenija pri socializme’, Voprosy filosofii 1955,4.
Ibid. p. 20.
Loc. cit..
Ibid. p. 19.
Ibid. p. 21.
Ibid. p. 20.
A. G. Zdravomyslov, Problema interesa v sociologiceskoj teorii (The Problem of Interest in Sociological Theory), (Leningrad, Izd. Leningradskogo universiteta, 1964). See A. Ajzikovič, ‘Obščestvennye interesy’ (Social Interests), in Filosofskaja enciklopedija vol. 4, pp. 116-17.
Ibid. p. 26.
Ibid. p. 24.
Ibid. p. 27.
Ibid. pp. 29-30.
Ibid. p. 32.
Ibid. p. 24.
H. B. Acton, The Illusion of the Epoch (London, Cohen and West, Ltd., 1955), pp. 112–113.
Ibid. pp. 189-90.
Drobnickij and Kon, eds., Slovar’ po etike, ‘Dolg’ (Duty), p. 77.
Ibid. pp.78-79.
Ibid. p. 77.
E. V. Sokolov, Nravstvennyj dolg i ego rol’ v obščestvennoj žizni (aftoreferat) (Moral Duty and its Role in Social Life — Author’s Summary), (Leningrad, 1964), p. 13.
Loc. cit..
Loc. cit..
Ibid. pp. 14-15.
L. V. Konovalova, ‘Dolg — central’naja kategorija etiki’ (Duty — the Central Category of Ethics), in Problemy kategorij marksistsko-leninskoj etiki, p. 165.
Loc. cit..
Bandzeladze, Etika, 2nd ed., pp. 216f.
Ibid. pp. 209-16.
Ibid. p. 199.
Ibid. p. 227.
Loc. cit..
Ibid. p. 228.
Ibid. pp. 228-29.
Ibid. p. 229.
Ibid. pp. 229-30.
Ibid. p. 236.
Ibid. pp. 237-42.
Drobnickij and Kon, eds., Slovar’ po etike, ‘Otvetstvennost’ (Responsibility), p. 214.
Ibid. p.215.
For Sogomonov’s argument, see above pp. 131-32.
See for example, A. F. Plaxotnyj,’ struktura i formy social’noj otvetstvennosti’ (The Structure and Forms of Social Responsibility), in Problemy kategorij marksistsko-leninskoj etiki, pp. 182-86; and A. I. Orexovskij, ‘O strukture kategorii otvetstvennosti’ (On the Structure of the Category of Responsibility), ibid. pp. 192-97.
Plaxotnyj, pp. 182-83.
Ibid. p. 183.
Ibid. p. 185.
Loc. cit..
V. E. Dolja, ‘Kategorija svobody voli v etike’ (The Category of Freedom of the Will in Ethics), ibid. p. 200.
Ibid. pp. 200-01.
Drobnickij and Kon, Slovar’ po etike,’ svoboda nravstvennaja’ (Moral Freedom), p. 280.
Loc. cit..
Ibid. pp. 280-81.
Siskin, Osnovy marksistskoj etiki (Foundations of Marxist Ethics), p. 171.
Loc. cit..
Ibid. p. 173.
F. G. Barghoorn, Soviet Russian Nationalism (New York, Oxford University Press, 1956), pp. 12–13.
P. Stucka, Tatriotizm’ (Patriotism), in the Enciklopedija gosudarstva i prava (Encyclopedia of the State and Law), (Moscow, 1926-1927, 3 vols.), vol. 3, pp. 252–254; quoted in Barghoorn, loc. cit..
Barghoorn, p. 16.
Loc. cit..
For a detailed discussion of the Moral Code for the Builders of Communism, see R. T. DeGeorge, Soviet Ethics and Morality (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor Paperbacks, 1969). For the phrase quoted, see p. 83.
SiSkin, Osnovy marksistskoj etike, pp. 277 and 263.
Ibid. p. 259.
Ibid. p. 265.
Ibid. p. 266.
Ibid. p. 273.
Bandzeladze, Etika, 2nd ed., p. 358.
Ibid. pp. 362-63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grier, P.T. (1978). Society and the Individual. In: Marxist Ethical Theory in the Soviet Union. Sovietica, vol 40. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9876-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9876-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9878-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9876-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive