Abstract
The trouble with the idea of measurement is its seeming clarity, its obviousness, its implicit claim to finality in any inquisitory discourse. Its status in philosophy of science is taken to be utterly primitive; hence the difficulties it embodies, if any, tend to escape detection and scrutiny. Yet it cannot be primitive in the sense of being exempt from analysis; for if it were, every measurement would require to be simply accepted as a protocol of truth, and one should never ask which of two conflicting measurements is correct, or preferable. Such questions are continually being asked, and their propriety in science indicates that even measurement, with its implication of simplicity and adroitness, points beyond itself to other matters of importance on which it relies for validation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. March, Quantum Mechanics of Particles and Wave Fields. Wiley, N.Y. 1951.
W. Heisenberg in Niels Bohr and the development of Physics. Ed. Paul, Rosenfeld and Weisskopf McGraw Hill, 1955.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Margenau, H. (1978). Philosophical Problems Concerning the Meaning of Measurement in Physics. In: Physics and Philosophy: Selected Essays. Episteme, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9845-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9845-2_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9847-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9845-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive