Advertisement

Bodilyness (Leibhaftigkeit) and History in Husserl

  • Mario A. Presas
Chapter
  • 115 Downloads
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 7)

Abstract

Beginning with Landgrebe’s interpretation of phenomenology we will examine a few essential aspects of the difficult relationship between temporality and absolute subjectivity. Our enquiry will focus upon two closely interwoven themes which have in a certain sense remained at the edge of Husserl’s central interest, the theme of bodilyness and the theme of the inner historicity of the monads. A deepening of our understanding of such themes would, on the one hand, lead to the necessity of revising the concept of “sensory data” and thus to the clarification of the special sense of the Husserlian “phenomenological-transcendental idealism”; on the other hand, the internal division in phenomenology and its possible convergence with Heidegger’s hermeneutics would thereby become clearer.

Keywords

Objective Unity Transcendental Phenomenology Cartesian Meditation Difficult Relationship Transcendental Subjectivity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Edmund Husserl, Formale und transzendentale Logik (ed. by P. Janssen), Nijhoff, The Hague, 1974, Husserliana XVII, p. 317. (Translated by Dorion Cairns as Formal and Transcendental Logic, Nijhoff, The Hague, 1969, p. 316.)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibid., p. 318. (Translation, p. 318.)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ibid., p. 317. (Translation, p. 317.)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edmund Husserl, Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge, edited by S. Strasser, (The Hague, 1963 ), Husserliana 1, p. 113. (Translated by Dorion Cairns as Cartesian Meditation, Nijhoff, The Hague, 1964, p. 79.)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ibid., (Translation, p. 80.)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Landgrebe gave this title to his detailed presentation of these problems of the Erste Philosophie. Now reprinted in Der Weg der Phänomenologie (Gütersloh, 1963), pp. 163-206.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Compare Edmund Husserl, Erste Philosophie, Part II, edited by R. Böhm, Nijhoff, The Hague, 1959, Husserliana VIII, p. 89.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ludwig Landgrebe, Der Weg der Phänomenologie, p. 205. Compare also Husserliana VIII, p. 61.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ludwig Landgrebe, ‘Reflexionen zu Husserls Konstitutionslehre’, Tidjschrift voor Filosojia, 36. J., 3, 1974, p. 473. One finds very similar views about l’être incarnée in Gabriel Marcel, Être et avoir, Paris, 1935, p. 12f. My lived-body is not a fact or a state-of-affairs, something given, but rather precisely a condition of possibility for every givenness whatever. To this extent my lived-body is not an object (that experienceable in an indissoluble felt togetherness. Compare Mario A. Presas, Gabriel Marcel, Buenos Aires, 1967.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ibid., p. 476.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ludwig Landgrebe, Phänomenologie und Geschichte (Gütersloh, 1968), p. 139.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edmund Husserl, Ideen II, edited by Marly Biemel, Nijhoff, The Hague 1952, Husserliana IV, p. 58.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Antonio Aguirre, Genetische Phänomenologie und Reduktion (The Hague, 1970), volume 38 of the Phänomenologica series, p. 167. Compare also Aguirre’s ‘Tranzendental- phänomenologisicher Rationalismus’, in the Festschrift for Professor Landgrebe, Perspektiven transzendental-phänomenologischer Forschung Nijhoff, The Hague, 1972, Phänomenologica 49, p. 126: “The untranscended appearance, or Hyle, is my own. Am affected by myself.”Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ibid., p. 136.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie, edited by Walter Biemal (The Hague, 1954), Husserliana VI, p. 188. (Translated by David Carr as The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, Northwestern U. Press, Evanston. 1970, p. 184.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ibid. (Translation, p. 185.)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Compare Ludwig Landgrebe, Phänomenologie und Geschichte, p. 164. Compare also Mario A. Presas, “Von der Phänomenologie zum Denken des Seins”, in the Zeitschrift für philophische Forschung, vol. 28, H.2., 1974, p. 188f.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ludwig Landgrebe, Meditation über Husserls Wort: “Die Geschichte ist das grosse Faktum des absoluten Seins”‘[Meditations on Husserl’s words: “History is the greatest fact of absolute being”], Tidjschrift voor Filosofia, 36 J., 1, 1974, p. 111. In this inexpressability of the immediate relation of anyone at all to himself, the proposition “individuum est ineffabile” has its ultimate ground. It is not merely a problem of linguistic logic, Landgrebe adds.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Erste Philosophie, p. 505.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ibid., p. 506.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ludwig Landgrebe, Der Weg der Phänomenologie, p. 56f.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ibid., p. 152.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Erste Philosophie, p. 506.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Compare Ludwig Landgrebe, “Faktizität und Individuation”, in Sein und Geschichtlichkeit, Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main, 1974, pp. 275–289.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario A. Presas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations