Advertisement

Quantifiers in Natural Languages: Some Logical Problems, I

  • Jaakko Hintikka
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 122)

Abstract

Quantifiers are by common consent among the most important ingredients in the logical structure of both formalized and natural languages. As we all know, formalized quantifiers and their generalizations have been studied extensively by logicians. In contrast, relatively little close attention has been paid to the peculiarities of the logical behavior of quantifiers in natural languages, in spite of the fact that quantifiers have figured conspicuously in some of the most important recent methodological controversies in linguistics.1 It is the purpose of this paper to help to change this situation by surveying some of the non-trivial logical phenomena that we find in examining natural-language quantifiers. In doing so, I am largely restricting my attention to the natural-language counterparts of logicians’ existential quantifier and universal quantifier, neglecting such ‘nonstandard’ quantifier words as ‘many’ and ‘most’. I shall cover in the survey a number earlier observations of mine which have already been partly published,2 but I shall also try to concentrate on certain new insights which serve to extend and to consolidate the old results.

Keywords

Natural Language Relative Clause Winning Strategy Universal Quantifier English Sentence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Carlson, Lauri, and Jaakko Hintikka, ‘Conditionals, Generic Quantifiers, and Other Applications of Subgames’ in E. Saarinen (ed.), Game-Theoretical Semantics, |D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. Davidson, Donald, ‘Truth and Meaning’, Synthese 17 (1967), pp. 304–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davidson, Donald, ‘On Saying That’, Synthese 19 (1968), pp. 130–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davidson, Donald, ‘True to the Facts’, Journal of Philosophy 66 (1969), pp. 748–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davidson, Donald, ‘Semantics for Natural Languages’, in Linguaggi nella società e nelle tecnica, edizioni di Comunità, Milan, 1970, pp. 177–188.Google Scholar
  6. Davidson, Donald, ‘In Defense of Convention T’, in H. Leblanc (ed.), Truth, Syntax, and Modality, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973, pp. 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fauconnier, Gilles, ‘Do Quantifiers Branch?’, Linguistic Inquiry 6 (1975), pp. 555–567.Google Scholar
  8. Hintikka, Jaakko, ‘Quantifiers vs. Quantification Theory’, Linguistic Inquiry 5 (1974), pp. 153–177.Google Scholar
  9. Hintikka, Jaakko, ‘On the Limitations of Generative Grammar’, in the Proceedings of the Scandinavian Seminar on Philosophy of Language, Filosofiska Förening & Filosofiska Institutionen vid Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala (1975a), vol. 1, pp. 1–92.Google Scholar
  10. Hintikka, Jaakko, ‘A Counterexample to Tarski-type Truth-Definitions as Applied to Natural Languages’, in Asa Kasher (ed.), Language in Focus: Foundations, Methods and Systems Essays in Memory of Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1975b), pp. 107–112.Google Scholar
  11. Hintikka, Jaakko, ‘Impossible Possible Worlds Vindicated’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (1975c), pp. 475–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hintikka, Jaakko, ‘Quantifiers in Logic and Quantifiers in Natural Languages’, in S. Körner (ed.), Philosophy of Logic, Oxford, Basil Blackwell (1976a), pp. 208–232.Google Scholar
  13. Hintikka, Jaakko, ‘The Prospects of Convention T’, Dialectica 30 (1976b), pp. 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hintikka, Jaakko, ‘Partially Ordered Quantifiers vs. Partially Ordered Ideas’, Dialectica 30 (1976c), pp. 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hintikka, Jaakko The Semantics of Questions and the Questions of Semantics (Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 28, no. 4), North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1976d.Google Scholar
  16. Hintikka, Jaakko and Lauri Carlson, ‘Pronouns of Laziness in Game-Theoretical Semantics’, Theoretical Linguistics 4 (1977), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hintikka, Jaakko, and Esa Saarinen, ‘Semantical Games and the Bach-Peters Paradox’, Theoretical Linguistics 2 (1975), pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lakoff, George, ‘Repartee, or a Reply to “Negation Conjunction, and Quantifier”’, Foundations of Language 6 (1970), pp. 398–422.Google Scholar
  19. Lakoff, George, ‘Repartee, or a Reply to “Negation Conjunction, and Quantifier”’, Foundations of Language 6 (1970), pp. 398–422.Google Scholar
  20. Partee, Barbara Hall, ‘Negation Conjunction, and Quantifiers: Syntax vs. Semantics’, Foundations of Language 6 (1970), pp. 153–165.Google Scholar
  21. Partee, Barbara Hall, ‘On the Requirement that Transformations Preserve Meaning’, in Charles J. Fillmore and D. Terence Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1971, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
  22. Rogers, Hartley, Jr ., ‘Certain Logical Reduction and Decision Problems’, Annals of Mathematics 64 (1956), pp. 264–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stenius, Erik, ‘Comments on Jaakko Hintikka’s Paper’,Dialectica 30 (1976).Google Scholar
  24. Suranyi, Janos, Reduktionstheorie des Entscheidungsproblems im Prädikatenkalkul der ersten Stufe, Verlag der ungarischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Budapest, 1959.Google Scholar
  25. Thomason, Richmond (ed.), Formal Philosophy: Selected Essays of Richard Montague, Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  26. Walkoe, W. J., Jr ., ‘Finite Partially-Ordered Quantification’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1970), pp. 535–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaakko Hintikka
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Academy of FinlandFinland
  2. 2.Stanford UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations