Advertisement

Is the Hilbert Space Language Too Rich?

Chapter
Part of the The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science book series (WONS, volume 7)

Abstract

In order to answer this question, we analyse different phenomena occurring in general experimental set-ups arranged to analyse the properties of some unknown beams of particles. We arrive at the conclusion that sometimes the Hilbert space language appears to be too rich and also that there are some phenomena where the notion of transition probability disappears and any attempt to introduce it leads to the possibility of infinitely many inequivalent descriptions. Our analysis encouraged us to ask the question whether the Hilbert space language is not too rich in the more realistic situations, for example to deal with high-energy elementary particle scattering phenomena. A programme of investigations in that direction is formulated.

In the polemic with axiomatic quantum mechanics it is shown that the pure state concept can be formulated independently of the existence of any maximal filter.

Keywords

Hilbert Space Transmission Probability Initial Beam Registration Ratio Usual Quantum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Birkoff, G. and von Neumann, J. (1936). The logic of quantum mechanics, Annals of Mathematics 37, 823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohr, N. (1961). Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. Science Editions Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  3. Dähn, G. (1968). Attempts of an axiomatic foundation of quantum mechanics and more general theories-IV, Communications of Mathematical Physics; 9, 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Finkelstein, D., Jauch, J. M., Schimonovich, S. and Speiser, D. (1962). Foundations of quaternionic quantum mechanics, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 3, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Finkelstein, D., Jauch, J. M., Schimonovich, S. and Speiser D. (1963). Some physical consequences of general Q-covariance, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 4, 788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Finkelstein, D. (1963). The Logic of Quantum Physics, p. 621. The New York Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  7. Finkelstein D. (1968). The Physics of Logic, ICTP, Trieste, preprint IC/68/35.Google Scholar
  8. Gunson, J. (1967). Structure of quantum mechanics, Communications of Mathematical Physics, 6, 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haag, R. and Kastler, D. (1964). An algebraic approach to quantum field theory, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 5, 848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jauch, J. M. (1964). The problem of measurement in quantum mechanics, Helvitica Physica Acta, 37, 293.Google Scholar
  11. Jauch, J. M. (1968). Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
  12. Jauch, J. M. and Piron, C. (1963). Helvetica Physica Acta, 36, 827.Google Scholar
  13. Kielanowski, P. and Kupczyński, M. (1971). Relativistic quark model predictions for the transversity amplitudes, Nuclear Physics, B29, 504.Google Scholar
  14. Kupczyński, M. (1971). On the Additivity Assumptions, Warsaw University preprint IFT/71/15.Google Scholar
  15. Ludwig, G. (1967). Attempt of an axiomatic foundation of quantum mechanics and more general theories-II, Communications of Mathematical Physics, 4, 331; for Part III see (1968). Communications of Mathematical Physics, 9, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mackey, G. W. (1963). Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. W. A. Benjamin Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  17. Mielnik, B. (1968). Geometry of quantum states, Communcations of Mathematical Physics, 9, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mielnik, B. (1969). Theory of filters, Communications of Mathematical Physics, 15, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Piron, C. (1964). Axiomatique quantique, Helvetica Physica Acta, 37, 439.Google Scholar
  20. Pool, J. C. T. (1968a). Baer*-semigroup and the logic of quantum mechanics, Communications of Mathematical Physics, 9, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pool, J. C. T. (1968b). Semimodularity and the logic of quantum mechanics, Communication of Mathematical Physics, 9, 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Theoretical PhysicsWarsaw UniversityPoland

Personalised recommendations