Advertisement

Prophylactic Preoperative Pacing

  • F.A. Pirzada
  • K. Venkataraman
  • J.E. Madias
  • W.B. HoodJr.
Chapter

Abstract

The threat of stress during anesthesia and surgery in patients with bifascicular block, precipitating complete heart block, raises the consideration of prophylactic temporary pacing. Guidelines for specific indications to pace in this high risk group are not as yet clear. Certainly the classification of the conduction pathway into a three fascicle system below the His bundle has made electrocardiographic recognition easy, but the involvement of the third fascicle making a patient more vulnerable to complete heart block cannot be reliably diagnosed. In right bundle branch block (RBBB) and left anterior hemiblock (LAH), one of the common varieties of bifascicular blocks confronted clinically, the estimated incidence of developing complete heart block is between 6 and 21 percent over a five-year follow-up period (l, 2). This range of probability especially under the stress of anesthesia and surgery creates the need for temporary pacing when such patients are confronted. Similar management problems also arise with other forms of bifascicular blocks which are also known to be forerunners of complete heart block. Clinical symptoms of dizziness and syncope indicate prior transient complete heart block in these patients, if no neurological reason exists, and thus are of help in the decision making. Increased PR interval on the suface electrocardiogram was thought to indicate tri-fascicular disease but has not proved to be of much significance as shown by Levites and Haft (3). Thus, with lack of guidelines in the decision making of to pace or not to pace in this clinical setting it may be argued that the insertion of a temporary pacemaker may be a relatively b~nign procedure as compared to the occurrence of complete heart block. However, the risk of infection, ventricular ectopy and occasional myocardial perforation warrants caution to such a statement.

Keywords

Leave Bundle Branch Block Complete Heart Block Right Bundle Branch Block Right Bundle Branch Block Versus Block 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. l.
    Venkataraman K, Madias J.E., Hood W.B. Jr., Indications for prophylactic preoperative insertion of pacemakers in patients with right bundle branch block and left anterior hemiblock. Chest 68: 501–506: 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kulbertus H.E., Qualifié du C., The magnitude of risk of developing complete heart block in patients with LAD-RBBB. Am Heart J. 86: 278–279, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levites R., Haft J.I., Significance of first degree heart block (prolonged P-R interval) in bifascicular block. Am. J. Card. 34: 259–264, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berg R., Kotler M.N., The significance of bilateral bundle branch block in the preoperative patient. Chest 59: 62–67, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kunstadt D., Punja M., Cagin N. et al., Bifascicular block: a clinical and electrophysiological study. Am. Heart J. 86: 173–181, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta P.K., Lichstein E., Chadda K.D., Intraventricular conduction time (H-V interval) during antegrade conduction in patients with heart block. Am. J. Card. 32: 27–31, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scheinman M.M., Brennan M., Modin G. et al., Comparative prospective study of bundle branch block. Circulation 51-(11): 113, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Narula O.S., Gann D., Samet P., Prognostic value ofH-V intervals. In His Bundle Electrocardiography, edited by Narula O.S. Philadelphia. F. A. Davis Company 1975, p. 437.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vera Z., Mason D.T., Fletcher R.D. et al.: Prolonged His-Q interval in chronic bifascicular block. Relation to impending complete heart block. Circulation 53: 46–55: 1976.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haft J.I., Kranz P.D., Intraventricular conduction intervals during orthograde conduction in patients with complete heart block. Chest. 63: 751–756, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dhingra R.C., Denes P., Wu D. et al., Prospective observations in patients with chronic bundle branch block and marked H-V prolongation. Circulation 53: 600–604, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12. McAnulty J., Murphy E., De Mots H. et al., Natural history of conduction system disease: A prospective study. Circulation 54 (Suppl. II): 51, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers by, The Hague 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • F.A. Pirzada
  • K. Venkataraman
  • J.E. Madias
  • W.B. HoodJr.

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations