Abstract
When we examine the early work of Husserl, we encounter the dominant influence of his teacher Brentano. It appears that Husserl also read the British empiricists, but that they did not determine the framework and background of his philosophy. All of Husserl’s earliest publications were inspired by the later Brentano’s descriptive analyses of origins.1 Husserl was certainly a very independent and gifted student of Brentano. In his doctrine of acts of a higher order, he made his own contribution to descriptive psychology, though which it became possible to carry out descriptive analyses in the case of the fundamental concepts of Husserl’s own academic field, i.e. mathematics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
See above 19.
See above 62.
See above 93.
See below 407.
Illemann, op.cit. 6of.
Osborn, op.cit. 43.
See above 27 note 17, 64.
Farber. op.cit. 27 note 2.
Biemel, op. cit. 39f, 49; see above 26.
Spiegelberg, The Phenomenological Movement, 74, 91, 114, 119f, 124.
Spiegelberg, op.cit. 101f.
See below 289.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv, The Hague
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Boer, T. (1978). Preliminary Conclusions. In: The Development of Husserl’s Thought. Phaenomenologica, vol 76. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9691-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9691-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-2124-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9691-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive