Fictional Objects: How they are and how they aren’t
- 124 Downloads
At Kenyon College, when I was an undergraduate (from 1957 to 1961), my friends and I argued hard about philosophical texts and issues, and we each spent many hours trying to think through the proper interpretation of these texts. A great deal of the stimulus for our discussions came from the seminars and other classes that Virgil Aldrich was running, as well as from his own present and past ideas on beauty as feeling, pictorial meaning and picture thinking, categorial ways of perceiving, and aesthetic experience. In presenting these ideas — and in his development of their descendants today — Aldrich has often appeared to me almost as a Socratic figure, compelling one’s attention with, as it is said in the Symposium, ‘nothing but a few simple words’. Like Socrates, he has refused to allow sophisticated theories to overrun basic truths, and yet he has not hesitated to suggest views of resonance and breadth.
KeywordsActual World Actual Object Impossible World Open Sentence Fictional World
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Hintikka, J.: 1969, Models for Modalities, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, D.: 1969, ‘Quantifying In’, in Davidson, D. and Hintikka, J., eds., Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 178–214.Google Scholar
- Kripke, S.: 1972, ‘Naming and Necessity’, in Davidson, D. and Harm an, G., eds., Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 253–355 and 763–769.Google Scholar
- Moore, G. E.: 1959, Philosophical Papers, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
- Parsons, T.: 1975, ‘A Meinongian Analysis of Fictional Objects’, Grazer Philosophische Studien, vol. 1, pp. 73–86.Google Scholar
- Plantinga, A.: 1974, The Nature of Necessity, Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
- Thomason, R. H.: 1973, ‘Perception and Individuation’, in Munitz, M., ed., Logic and Ontology, New York University Press, New York, pp. 261–285.Google Scholar
- Tolstoy, L.: no date, Anna Karenina, Grosset and Dunlap, New York.Google Scholar
- Woods, J.: 1974, The Logic of Fiction, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
- Woods, J.: forthcoming, ‘Meinongean Theories of Fictional Objects’, to appear in the Journal of Literary Semantics.Google Scholar