Skip to main content

Human Factors in Clinical Judgment: Discussion of Scriven’s ‘Clinical Judgment’

  • Chapter
Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 6))

Abstract

It would be quite impossible to comment in detail on each of the main points in Scriven’s wide-ranging paper. Much of it is concerned with the issue of clinical versus statistical prediction and with the implications of the well replicated research finding that clinical judgments can be reproduced or even improved upon by simple statistical formulas derived from a representative sample of prior judgments [11]. This appears to be a puzzling, contra-intuitive, controversial research finding. For surely its implications have been only slowly incorporated in clinical practice, and have perhaps been more resisted and avoided than attended to. This discussion, therefore, will focus on one major question: Why do simple formulas for judgment so consistently equal or exceed the accuracy of human inference? I shall answer this question in two ways: first, by offering a critique of human judgment from an information-processing perspective, and second, by critically examining the research model that produced this finding My concern will be, then, with the psychological processes of clinical judgment and with ascertaining what research on clinical judgment has actually studied. The overall thrust of the discussion will be to agree with the main line of Scriven’s argument, while pointing out that there is still an “on the other hand”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  1. Bartlett, F. C.: 1932, Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  2. DeGroot, A. D.: 1965, Thought and Choice in Chess, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards, W.: 1968, ‘Conservatism in Human Information Processing’, in B. Kleinmuntz (ed.), Formal Representation of Human Judgment, Wiley, New York, pp. 17–52.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Einhorn, H. J.: 1972, ‘Expert Measurement and Mechanical Combination’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 7, 86–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Elstein, A. S.: 1976, “Clinical Judgment: Psychological Research and Medical Practice”, Science 194, 696-700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elstein, A. S., Shulman, L. S., Sprafka, S.A.: 1978, Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fryback, D.: 1974, Use of Radiologists’ Subjective Probability Estimates in Medical Decision Making Problem, Mathematical Psychology Program, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gettys, C. F., Kelly, C., and Peterson, C. R.: 1973, ‘The Best-Guess Hypothesis in Multistage Inference’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 10, 364–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gill, P. W., Leaper, D. J., Guillou, P. J., Staniland, J. R., Horrocks, J. C., and De Dombal, F. T.: 1973, ‘Observer Variation in Clinical Diagnosis - a Computer-Aided Assessment of its Magnitude and Importance in 552 Patients with Abdominal Pain’, Methods of Information in Medicine 12, 108–113.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberg, L. R.: 1968, ‘Simple Models or Simple Processes? Some Research on Clinical Judgments’, American Psychologist 23, 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldberg, L. R.: 1970, ‘Man Versus Model of Man: A Rationale, Plus Some Evidence, for a Method of Improving on Clinical Inferences’, Psychological Bulletin 73, 422–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hammond, K., Stewart, T., Bremer, B., Steinmann, D.: “Social Judgment Theory” in M. F. Kaplan and S. Schwartz, (eds.): 1975, Human Judgment and Decision Processes, Academic Press, New York, pp. 271–312.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holt, R. R.: 1958, ‘Clinical and Statistical Prediction: A Reformulation and Some New Data’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 56, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.: 1973, ‘On the Psychology of Prediction’, Psychological Review 80, 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kleinmuntz, B.: 1968, ‘The Processing of Clinical Information by Man and Machine’, in B. Kleinmuntz (ed.), Formal Representation of Human Judgment, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koran, L. M.: 1965, ‘The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and Judgments’, New England Journal of Medicine 293, 642–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meehl, P. E.: 1954, Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Neuhauser, D., and Lewicki, A. M.: 1975, ‘What do we Gain from the Sixth Stool Guaiac?’, New England Journal of Medicine 293, 226–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Newell, A., and Simon, H. A.: 1972, Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oskamp, S.: 1965, ‘Overconfidence in Case Study Judgments’, Journal of Consulting Psychology 29, 261–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Simon, H. A.: 1969, The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sisson, J. D., Schoomaker, E. B., Ross, J. C.: 1976, ‘Clinical Decision Analysis — the Hazard of Using Additional Data’, The Journal of the American Medical Association 236, 1259–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S.: 1971, ‘Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 6, 649–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Slovic, P., Rorer, L. G., and Hoffman, P. J.: 1971, ‘Analyzing Use of Diagnostic Signs’, Investigative Radiology 6, 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smedslund, J.: 1963, ‘The Concept of Correlation in Adults’, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 4, 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.: 1974, ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zieve, L.: 1966, ‘Misinterpretation and Abuse of Laboratory Tests by Clinicians’, Annals of the New York Academy of Science 124, 563–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elstein, A.S. (1979). Human Factors in Clinical Judgment: Discussion of Scriven’s ‘Clinical Judgment’. In: Engelhardt, H.T., Spicker, S.F., Towers, B. (eds) Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9399-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9399-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9401-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9399-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics