It would be quite impossible to comment in detail on each of the main points in Scriven’s wide-ranging paper. Much of it is concerned with the issue of clinical versus statistical prediction and with the implications of the well replicated research finding that clinical judgments can be reproduced or even improved upon by simple statistical formulas derived from a representative sample of prior judgments . This appears to be a puzzling, contra-intuitive, controversial research finding. For surely its implications have been only slowly incorporated in clinical practice, and have perhaps been more resisted and avoided than attended to. This discussion, therefore, will focus on one major question: Why do simple formulas for judgment so consistently equal or exceed the accuracy of human inference? I shall answer this question in two ways: first, by offering a critique of human judgment from an information-processing perspective, and second, by critically examining the research model that produced this finding My concern will be, then, with the psychological processes of clinical judgment and with ascertaining what research on clinical judgment has actually studied. The overall thrust of the discussion will be to agree with the main line of Scriven’s argument, while pointing out that there is still an “on the other hand”.
- Human Factor
- Clinical Judgment
- Clinical Reasoning
- Research Paradigm
- Combination Rule
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bartlett, F. C.: 1932, Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
DeGroot, A. D.: 1965, Thought and Choice in Chess, Mouton, The Hague.
Edwards, W.: 1968, ‘Conservatism in Human Information Processing’, in B. Kleinmuntz (ed.), Formal Representation of Human Judgment, Wiley, New York, pp. 17–52.
Einhorn, H. J.: 1972, ‘Expert Measurement and Mechanical Combination’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 7, 86–106.
Elstein, A. S.: 1976, “Clinical Judgment: Psychological Research and Medical Practice”, Science 194, 696-700.
Elstein, A. S., Shulman, L. S., Sprafka, S.A.: 1978, Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Fryback, D.: 1974, Use of Radiologists’ Subjective Probability Estimates in Medical Decision Making Problem, Mathematical Psychology Program, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Gettys, C. F., Kelly, C., and Peterson, C. R.: 1973, ‘The Best-Guess Hypothesis in Multistage Inference’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 10, 364–373.
Gill, P. W., Leaper, D. J., Guillou, P. J., Staniland, J. R., Horrocks, J. C., and De Dombal, F. T.: 1973, ‘Observer Variation in Clinical Diagnosis - a Computer-Aided Assessment of its Magnitude and Importance in 552 Patients with Abdominal Pain’, Methods of Information in Medicine 12, 108–113.
Goldberg, L. R.: 1968, ‘Simple Models or Simple Processes? Some Research on Clinical Judgments’, American Psychologist 23, 483–496.
Goldberg, L. R.: 1970, ‘Man Versus Model of Man: A Rationale, Plus Some Evidence, for a Method of Improving on Clinical Inferences’, Psychological Bulletin 73, 422–432.
Hammond, K., Stewart, T., Bremer, B., Steinmann, D.: “Social Judgment Theory” in M. F. Kaplan and S. Schwartz, (eds.): 1975, Human Judgment and Decision Processes, Academic Press, New York, pp. 271–312.
Holt, R. R.: 1958, ‘Clinical and Statistical Prediction: A Reformulation and Some New Data’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 56, 1–12.
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.: 1973, ‘On the Psychology of Prediction’, Psychological Review 80, 237–251.
Kleinmuntz, B.: 1968, ‘The Processing of Clinical Information by Man and Machine’, in B. Kleinmuntz (ed.), Formal Representation of Human Judgment, Wiley, New York.
Koran, L. M.: 1965, ‘The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and Judgments’, New England Journal of Medicine 293, 642–646.
Meehl, P. E.: 1954, Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Neuhauser, D., and Lewicki, A. M.: 1975, ‘What do we Gain from the Sixth Stool Guaiac?’, New England Journal of Medicine 293, 226–228.
Newell, A., and Simon, H. A.: 1972, Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Oskamp, S.: 1965, ‘Overconfidence in Case Study Judgments’, Journal of Consulting Psychology 29, 261–265.
Simon, H. A.: 1969, The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Sisson, J. D., Schoomaker, E. B., Ross, J. C.: 1976, ‘Clinical Decision Analysis — the Hazard of Using Additional Data’, The Journal of the American Medical Association 236, 1259–1263.
Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S.: 1971, ‘Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 6, 649–744.
Slovic, P., Rorer, L. G., and Hoffman, P. J.: 1971, ‘Analyzing Use of Diagnostic Signs’, Investigative Radiology 6, 18–26.
Smedslund, J.: 1963, ‘The Concept of Correlation in Adults’, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 4, 165–173.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.: 1974, ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science 185, 1124–1131.
Zieve, L.: 1966, ‘Misinterpretation and Abuse of Laboratory Tests by Clinicians’, Annals of the New York Academy of Science 124, 563–572.
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elstein, A.S. (1979). Human Factors in Clinical Judgment: Discussion of Scriven’s ‘Clinical Judgment’. In: Engelhardt, H.T., Spicker, S.F., Towers, B. (eds) Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9399-0_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9401-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9399-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive