Skip to main content

Descriptions of Actions and their Place in History

  • Chapter
Philosophy of History and Action

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series in Philosophy ((PSSP,volume 11))

  • 159 Accesses

Abstract

It is generally accepted that the word “history” has a two-fold meaning. On the one hand, it refers to the course of past events which historians study. On the other hand, we use it to denote the written accounts of these events, namely, the products of historical inquiry. Philosophy of history which deals with history in the former sense is sometimes called “speculative,” while philosophy of history in the latter sense is called “analytical” or “critical.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. They are so called by William H. Dray, Philosophy of History, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1964, pp. 12, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Idea of History, Oxford, 1946, p. 213.

    Google Scholar 

  3. An Introduction to Philosophy of History, London, 1951 (3rd ed. 1967), p. 16. On p. 60 Walsh expresses some reservation, but his general outlook remains Collingwoodian through the book. There is, however, some evidence that he has changed his mind; cf. his “Colligatory Concepts in History,” in Studies in the Nature and Teaching of History, ed. W.H. Burston and Thompson, London, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Laws and Explanation in History, Oxford, 1957, p. 118.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The Idea of History, p. 214.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laws and Explanation in History, p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  7. “Action and Responsibility,” in Philosophy in America, ed. Max Black, Ithaca, N.Y.. 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  8. “Agency,” in Agent, Action and Reason, ed. R. Binkley, R. Bronaugh and A. Marras. Oxford, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Explanation and Understanding, London, 1971, pp. 66–68, 87–89.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  11. “What We Can Do,” Journal of Philosophy 60 (1963): 435–445; “Basic Actions,” American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (1965): 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  12. “Agency,” p. 10f.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.E. Atwell, “The Accordion-Effect Thesis,” The Philosophical Quarterly 19 (1969): 337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. see Davidson, “The Accordion-Effect Thesis,” The Philosophical Quarterly 19 (1969), p. 16, note 10.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Causation in the Law, Oxford, 1959. The similarity of the lawyer’s and the historian’s causal language is indicated on pp. 2, 8, 10, 11, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Philosophy of History, p. 57f.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Causation in the Law, p. 22f. They think, however, that in history as in law, causal terminology is used for both purposes (p. 59).

    Google Scholar 

  20. “Agency,” p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. It has been called so by Alvin I. Goldman; see his A Theory of Human Action, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1970, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  22. “Agency,” p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid., p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Explanation and Understanding, p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See G.E.M. Anscombe, Intention, 2nd ed., Oxford, 1963, pp. 44, 48; Stuart Hampshire, Thought and Action, London, 1959; J.L. Austin, “Three Ways of Spilling Ink,” in Philosophical Papers, 2nd ed., Oxford, 1970, pp. 283f.

    Google Scholar 

  27. “Agency,” p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See also von Wright, p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  29. “A Mistake about Causality in Social Science,” in Philosophy, Politics and Society (2nd Series), ed. Peter Laslett and W.G. Runciman, Oxford, 1962, p. 59f.

    Google Scholar 

  30. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas,” in History and Theory 8 (1969): 3–53.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid., pp. 11, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibid., p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Analytical Philosophy of History, Cambridge, 1965, p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid., p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  35. “The Study of Contemporary History,” Journal of Contemporary History 1 (1966): 4.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid., p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Friedrich A. von Hayek, “The Results of Human Action but not of Human Design.” in Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, London, 1967. pp. 96–105: Karl R. Popper. The Poverty of Historicism, London. 1961, p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  38. “The Next Assignment.” American Historical Review 63 (1957–58): 283–304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weinryb, E. (1978). Descriptions of Actions and their Place in History. In: Yovel, Y. (eds) Philosophy of History and Action. Philosophical Studies Series in Philosophy, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9365-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9365-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9367-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9365-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics