Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • 26 Accesses

Part of the book series: Bibliotheca Neerlandica Extra Muros ((BNEM,volume 5))

Abstract

Herman Heijermans (1864–1924) was convinced that he lived in an “overgangstijdperk,” a transitional period.1 As a young Man in the eighteen nineties, he rejected those values and life styles which he felt belonged to the past period dominated by the bourgeoisie, and sought out situations and a profession which would attune him to the future when, he hoped, the proletariat would be in power. He left the conservative business milieu of Rotterdam in 18922 and went to Amsterdam — then teeming with radical ideas. At first, Heijermans was attracted to a group of poets, de tachtigers, who were claiming to have enlivened the stale tradition of Dutch poetry by discovering language and beauty in a totally new way; but soon he felt them to be elitist. Then, in 1895, he became a member of the newly founded Dutch Social Democratic Workers Party. He alienated himself from the literary circles by claiming that art should be socialistic and by rejecting the class separation between artists and workers. He felt himself to be one with the proletariat and, through them, with “The New Life” and “The New Humanity.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Hunningher, Toneel en Werkelijkheid (Rotterdam, 1947) p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biographical information is based on the chapter “A Biographical Sketch,” in Seymour L. Flaxman, Herman Heijermans and His Dramas (Den Haag, 1954) pp. 15–63. Hereafter, references to this work will be by page number within the text.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Toneel en Werkelijkheid; Flaxman; and C.A. Schilp, Herman Heijermans (Amsterdam 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. de Jong, Herman Heijermans en de vernieuwing van het Europese drama, Diss. Utrecht, 1967 ( Groningen, 1967 ). Hereafter, references to this work will be by page number within the text.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The discussion about dualism is based on Eric Bentley, “Melodrama” in The Life of the Drama (New York, 1964) pp. 195–218; Robert B. Heilman, Tragedy and Melodrama (Seattle, 1968); Wylie Sypher, “Aesthetic of Revolution: The Marxist Melodrama” in Tragedy: Vision and Form, ed. Robert W. Corrigan (San Francisco, 1965 ) pp. 258–267.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wylie Sypher, p. 260.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joseph Wood krutch, The Modern Temper (New York, 1956) p. xi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Neck Yoder, H. (1978). Introduction. In: Dramatizations of Social Change: Herman Heijermans’ Plays as Compared with Selected Dramas by Ibsen, Hauptmann and Chekhov. Bibliotheca Neerlandica Extra Muros, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9286-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9286-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9288-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9286-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics