Skip to main content

On the Interpretability of Ordination Diagrams

  • Chapter
Classification and Ordination

Part of the book series: Advances in vegetation science ((AIVS,volume 2))

Abstract

In my review of multivariate methods in phytosociology (van der Maarel 1979) I briefly commented on the interpretability of Type A distortions (see Orlóci 1974b, 1978), i.e. ‘horseshoe’, (‘arch’) effects in ordination diagrams of axes 1 and 2. Such effects are now generally recognized as the result of curvilinearities intrinsic to community data i.e. (1) the bellshaped species response curves along environmental gradients and (2) the nonlinear decrease of sample similarity with increasing sample separation (Gauch, Whittaker & Wentworth 1977, see also Swan 1970, Noy-Meir & Austin 1970, Gauch & Whittaker 1972, Austin 1976, Noy-Meir & Whittaker 1978 and Whittaker & Gauch 1978 to mention a few papers I consulted again for this purpose). Hill & Gauch (1980) even say more straightforwardly: ‘the arch effect is simply a mathematical artifact, corresponding to no real structure in the data’, when discussing faults of reciprocal averaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Austin, M.P. 1976. On non-linear species response models in ordination. Vegetatio 33: 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M.P. 1980. Searching for a model for use in vegetation analysis. In: E. van der Maarel (ed.) Advances in vegetation science: Classification and ordination. Vegetatio 42: 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G. & R.H. Whittaker. 1972. Coenocline simulation. Ecology 53: 446–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauch Jr. H.J., R.H. Whittaker & T.R. Wentworth, 1977. A comparative study of reciprocal averaging and other ordination techniques. J. Ecol. 65: 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J.P. 1973. Control of species density in herbaceous vegetation. J. Envir. Manage. 1: 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J.P. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Amer. Natur. 111: 1169–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O. 1973. Reciprocal averaging: An eigenvector method of ordination. J. Ecol. 61: 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O. 1979. Decorana. A Fortran program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca. 52 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O. & H.G. Gauch Jr. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis, an improved ordination technique. In: E. van der Maarel (ed.). Advances in vegetation science: Classification and ordination. Vegetatio 42: 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, S. 1978. Influences of transformation of cover values on classification and ordination of lake vegetation. Vegetatio 37: 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louppen, J.W.M., M.J.A. Werger & J.H.M. Eppink. 1978. Vegetation boundaries and species performances along an environmental gradient. Abstracts 2nd. Int. Congr. Ecology, Jerusalem, p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarel, E. van der. 1972. Ordination of plant communities on the basis of their plant genus, family and order relationships. In: E. van der Maarel & R. Tiixen (ed.). Grundfragen und Methoden der Pflanzensoziologie. Ber. Int. Symp. Rinteln 1970, Junk, Den Haag. p. 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarel, E. van der. 1976. On the establishment of plant community boundaries. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 89: 415–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarel, E. van der. 1979. Multivariate methods in phyto-sociology, with reference to the Netherlands. In M.J.A. Werger (ed.) The study of vegetation, p. 161–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarel, E. van der. 1979a. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 39: 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maarel, E. van der, J.G.M. Janssen & J.M.W. Louppen. 1978. TABORD, a program for structuring phytosociological tables. Vegetatio 38: 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maarel, E. van der & J. Leertouwer. 1967. Variation in vegetation and species diversity along a local environmental gradient. Acta Bot. Neerl. 16: 211–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois, D. & H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York, XI + 547 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I. & P. Austin. 1970. Principal component ordination and simulated vegetation data. Ecology 51: 551–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I.D. Walker & W.T. Williams. 1975. Data transformations in ecological ordination. II. On the meaning of data standardization. J. Ecol. 63: 779–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I. & R.H. Whittaker. 1978. Recent developments in continuous multivariate techniques. In R.H. Whittaker (ed.) Ordination of plant communities, p. 337–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. 1974. On information flow in ordination. Vegetatio 29: 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. 1978. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. 2nd. ed. Junk, The Hague, Boston, IX+ 451 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskam, E. 1971. Programme ORDINA: Multidimensional ordination of observation vectors. Programme Bull. 16, Psychology Lab. Nijmegen, 8 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J.M.A. 1970. An examination of some ordination problems by use of simulated vegetational data. Ecology 51: 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werger, M.J.A., H. Wild & B.R. Drummond. 1978. Vegetation structure and substrate of the Northern part of the Great Dyke, Rhodesia: Gradient analysis and dominance-diversity relationships. Vegetatio 37: 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. & H.G. Gauch Jr. 1978. Evaluation of ordination techniques, 2nd ed. In R.H. Whittaker (ed.) Ordination of plant communities, p. 277–336. Junk, The Hague, 388 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Eddy van der Maarel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Dr. W. Junk bv Publishers, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Maarel, E. (1980). On the Interpretability of Ordination Diagrams. In: van der Maarel, E. (eds) Classification and Ordination. Advances in vegetation science, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9197-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9197-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9199-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9197-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics