Abstract
This contribution is based on two earlier internal reports (Kortekaas & Van der Maarel 1972. 1973): the first one presented at the Colloquium during the Symposium of the International Soeiety for Vegetation Scicncc. at Todenmann near Rinteln. March. 1972: the second at the conference of the Working Group for Data-Processing, Prague. September 1973.
Contribution from the Working Group for Data-Processing in Phytosociology. International Society for Vegetation Science. Nomenclature follows the Trieste coding system (Pignatti. this issue, and Lausi. Kortekaas & Beeftink. next issue).
Part of this work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for the Advancement of Puve Research.
Communication number 40
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beeftink, W. G. & J.-M. Géhu 1973. Spartinetea maritimae. In: R. Tüxen (ed.). Prodrome des Groupments végétaux d’Europe. Lieferung 1. J. Cramer Verlag. Lehre. 43 pp.
Curtis, J. T. 1959. The vegetation of Wisconsin An ordination of plant communities. Univ. of Wisconsin Press. Madison. Wisconsin. XI+ 657 pp.
Ellenberg, H 1956. Grundlagen der Vegetationsglicderung I. Teil: Aufgaben und Methoden der Vegetations- kunde. In: H. Walter (ed.). Ellenberg. H. 136 PP.
Hofmann, G. & H. Passarge. 1964. Über Homogenität und Affinität in der Vegetationskunde Arch. Forstwes. 13: 1119–1138.
Kortekaas, W. M. & E. van der Maarel. 1972. A numerical classification of Spartinetum vegetations. Preliminary paper Int colloquium Rinteln 1972. 9 pp. + tables
Kortekaas. W. M. & E. van der Maarel. 1973. A numerical classification of Sparlinetum vegetations II. Comparison of the computer-based numerical system with the system published in the ‘Prodrome des Groupements vègètaux d’Europe’. Paper Symp Working Group for Data-Processing in Phytosociology. Prague September 1973. J pp. + tables.
Looman, J. & J. B. Campbell 1960. Adaptation of Stìrensen’s K (1948) for estimating unit affinities in prairie vegetation. Ecology 41: 409–416.
Maarel, E., van der. L. Orlóci & S. Pignatti. 1976. Data-Processing in phytosociology. retrospect and anticipation Vegetotio 32: 65–72.
Mobberley, D. G. 1956. Taxonomy and distribution of the genus Spartina. Iowa State College i Sci 30: 471–574.
Raabe, E.W. 1952. Über den Affinitütswert’ in der Pflanzensoziologie. Vegetatio 4: 53–68.
Sokal, R.R. & P.H.A. Sneath 1963 Principles of numerical taxonomy San Francisco XVI + 359 pp.
Sorensen, Th. A. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similanty of species content. Biol. Skr. K danske Vidensk, Selsk (4): 1–34.
Westhoff, V. & E. van der Maarel. 1973. The Braun Blanquet approach. In R. H. Whittaker (ed.). Handbook of vegetation science. Part 5. Classification and ordination of communities, p. 617–726. Junk. Den Haag.
Williams, W. T. & J. M. Lambert 1959 Multivariate methods in plant ecology I. Association analysis in plant communities. J Ecol 47: 83–101.
Wishart, D. 1969. Clustan la User manual. St. Andrews Computing Centre.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Dr. W. Junk bv Publishers, The Hague
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kortekaas, W.M., van der Maarel, E., Beeftink, W.G. (1980). A Numerical Classification of European Spartina Communities. In: van der Maarel, E., Orlóci, L., Pignatti, S. (eds) Data-processing in phytosociology. Advances in vegetation science I, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9194-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9194-1_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9196-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9194-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive