Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 145))

Abstract

The nature and function of scientific theories is perhaps the most central problem within the philosophy of science. To study the basic features of theories and their role in scientific inquiry, a philosopher should be able to construe them as entities which he can handle and investigate. It is therefore no wonder that questions concerning the most appropriate ways of reconstructing scientific theories have a crucial importance in discussions about the proper method which philosophers of science should follow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Achinstein, P.: 1968, Concepts of Science, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, W.: 1978, ‘Incommensurability and Reduction’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela ( 1978 ), pp. 313–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, W. and Sneed, J.: 1977, ‘Generalized Net Structures of Empirical Theories, I’, Studia Logica 36, 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beth, E., ‘Semantics of Physical Theories’, in H. Freudenthal (ed.), The Concept and the Role of the Model in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1961, pp. 48–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R.J. (ed.): 1976, Local Induction, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butts, R.E. and Hintikka, J. (eds.): 1977, Historical and Philosophical Dimensions of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1971, ‘A Basic System of Inductive Logic’, in R. Carnap and R.C. Jeffrey (eds.), Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. 1, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 35–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, A.: 1956, Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1954, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.: 1977, Review of Stegmüller (1973), The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28, 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G., Begriffschrift (1879). English transl. in J. van Heijenoort (ed.): 1967. From Frege to Gödel: A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic 1879–1931, Harvard University Press, Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giedymin, J.: 1971, ‘The Paradox of Meaning Variance’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22 30–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girill, T.R.: 1973, ‘The Logic of Scientific Puzzles’, Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 4, 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris J.H.: 1978. ‘A Semantical Alternative to the Sneed-Stegmüller-Kuhn Conception of Scientific Theories’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela ( 1978 ), pp. 184–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G.: 1970, ‘On the “Standard Conception” of Scientific Theories’, in M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 142–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M.: 1974, The Structure of Scientific Inference, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. and Tuomela, R.: 1970, ‘Towards a General Theory of Auxiliary Concepts and Definability in First-Order Theories’, in J. Hintikka and P. Suppes (eds.), Information and Inference, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 298–330.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kamlah, A.: 1976, ‘An Improved Definition of “Theoretical in a Given Theory”’, Erkenntnis 10, 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner, S.: 1970, ‘Erotetic Logic and the Structure of Scientific Revolution’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21, pp. 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajewski, W.: 1977, Correspondence Principle and the Growth of Knowledge, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2nd ed. 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S.: 1974, ‘Second Thoughts on Paradigms’, in Suppe ( 1974 ), pp. 459–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S.: 1976, ‘Theory-Change as Structure Change: Comments on the Sneed Formalism’, Erkenntnis 10, 179–199. (Also in Butts and Hintikka, 1977, pp. 289–309.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1970, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 91–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1977, Progress and Its Problems, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, K.: 1977, ‘Social Information’, Monist 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, I.: 1976, ‘Acceptance Revisited’, in Bogdan pp. 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, D.: 1976, ‘Investigations of the Concept of Reduction, I’, Erkenntnis 10, 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1961, ‘Deterministic Theories’, in R. Washburne (ed.), Decisions, Values, and Groups, II, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 325–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulines, C.-U.: 1975, Review of Sneed (1971), Erkenntnis 9, 423–436. [1975a.]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulines, C.-U.: 1975, ‘A Logical Reconstruction of Simple Equilibrium Thermodynamics’, Erkenntnis 9, 101–130. [1975b.]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulines, C.-U.: 1976, ‘Approximate Application of Empirical Theories: A General Explication’, Erkenntnis 10, 201–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulines, C.-U.: 1979, ‘Theory-Nets and the Dynamics of Theories: The Example of Newtonian Mechanics’, Synthese 41, 417–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1976, ‘Inquiries, Problems, and Questions: Remarks on Local Induction’, in Bogdan, pp. 263–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1977, ‘On the Truthlikeness of Generalizations’, in R.E. Butts and J. Hintikka (eds.), Basic Problems of Methodology and Linguistics, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 121–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1978a, ‘Notes on Popper as Follower of Whewell and Peirce’, Ajatus 37, 272–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ninniluoto, I.: 1978b, ‘Truthlikeness: Comments on Recent Discussion’, Synthese 38, pp. 281–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1978c, ‘Verisimilitude, Theory-Change, and Scientific Progress’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela ( 1978 ), pp. 243–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. and Tuomela, R.: 1973, Theoretical Concepts and Hypothetico-Inductive Inference, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. and Tuomela, R. (eds.): 1978, The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change (Acta Philosophical Fennica 30), North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, L.: 1975, ‘Relative Truth, the Correspondence Principle and Absolute Truth’, Philosophy of Science 42, 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H.: 1952, Science and Hypothesis, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1963, Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przetecki, M.: 1969, The Logic of Empirical Theories, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przetecki, M.: 1974, ‘A Set-Theoretic versus a Model Theoretic Approach to the Logical Structure of Physical Theories’, Studia Logica 33, pp. 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przetecki, M.: 1978, ‘Commensurable Referents of Incommensurable Terms’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela ( 1978 ), pp. 347–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przetecki, M. and Wojcicki, R. (eds.): 1977, Twenty-Five Years of Logical Methodology in Poland, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rantala, V.: 1977, Aspects of Definability (Acta Philosophica Fennica 29 ), North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rantala, V.: 1978a, ‘The Old and New Logic of Metascience’, Synthese 39, 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rantala, V.: 1978b, “Correspondence and Non-Standard Models: A Case Study”, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela ( 1978 ), pp. 366–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheibe, E.: 1973, The Logical Analysis of Quantum Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheibe, E.: 1976, ‘Conditions of Progress and the Comparability of Theories’, in R.S. Cohen et al. (eds.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheibe, E.: 1978, ‘On the Structure of Physical Theories’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela ( 1978 ), pp. 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W.: 1963, Science, Perception and Reality, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapere, D.: 1974, ‘Scientific Theories and Their Domains’, in Suppe ( 1974 ), pp. 518–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: 1977, Models of Discovery, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, J.: 1971, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, J., 1976, ‘Philosophical Problems in the Empirical Science of Science: A Formal Approach’, Erkenntnis 10, pp. 115–146. (Also in Butts and Hintikka, 1977, pp. 245–268.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, J.: 1978, ‘Invariance Principles and Theoretization’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela ( 1978 ), pp. 130–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1970, Theorie und Erfahrung, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1973, Theorienstrukturen und Theoriendynamik, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1974, ‘Theorienstruktur und logisches Verständnis’, in W. Diederich (ed.), Theorien der Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 167–209. English transl. ‘Logical Understanding and the Dynamics of Theories’, in W. Stegmüller, 1977, Collected Papers, II, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 150–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1975, ‘Structures and Dynamics of Theories: Some Reflections on J.D. Sneed and T.S. Kuhn’, Erkenntnis 9, 75–100. Also in Collected Papers, II, pp. 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1976a, The Structure and Dynamics of Theories, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg-Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1976b, ‘Accidental (“Non-Substantial”) Theory Change and Theory Dislodgment’, Erkenntnis 10, 147–178. Also in Butts and Hintikka (1977), pp. 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1976, ‘Normale Wissenschaft und wissenschaftliche Revolutionen — Kritische Betrachtungen zur Kontroverse zwischen Karl Popper und Thomas Kuhn’, Wissenschaft und Weltbild 29, 169–180. [1976c.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1978a, ‘A Combined Approach to the Dynamics of Theories’, Theory and Decision 9, 39–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1978, ‘The Structuralist View: Survey, Recent Developments and Answers to Some Criticisms’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela (1978), pp. 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F.: 1972, ‘What’s Wrong with the Received View on the Structure of Scientific Theories’, Philosophy of Science 39, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F. (ed.): 1974, The Structure of Scientific Theories, The University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P.: 1957, Introduction to Logic, Van Nostrand, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P.: 1967, ‘What is a Scientific Theory’, in S. Morgenbesser (ed.), Philosophy of Science Today, Basic Books, New York, pp. 55–67. [1967a.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P.: 1967, Set-Theoretic Structures in Science, mimeographed, Stanford University, Stanford, [1967b.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P.: 1969, Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suszko, R.: 1968, ‘Formal Logic and the Development of Knowledge’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Problems in the Philosophy of Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 210–222.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swijtink, Z.: 1976, ‘Eliminability in a Cardinal’, Studia Logica 35, 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.: 1972, Human Understanding, Vol. I, Princeton Unviersity Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela, R.: 1973, Theoretical Concepts, Springer, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela, R.: 1978a, ‘Scientific Change and Approximation’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela ( 1978 ), pp. 265–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela, R.: 1978b, ‘On the Structuralist Approach to the Structure and Dynamics of Theories’, Synthese 39, 211–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Törnebohm, H.: 1976, ‘On Piecemeal Knowledge-Formation’, in Bogdan, pp. 297–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.: 1970, ‘On the Extension of Beth’s Semantics of Physical Theories’, Philosophy of Science 37, 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojcicki, R.: 1973, ‘Basic Concepts of Formal Methodology of Empirical Sciences’, Ajatus 35, 168–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojcicki, R.: 1974a, ‘Set-Theoretic Representations of Empirical Phenomena’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 3, 337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojcicki, R., 1974b, ‘Comments on Przetecki’, Studia Logica 33, 105–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Additional Bibliography

  • Balzer, W.: Empirische Geometrie und Raum-Zeit-Theorie in mengen-theoretischer Darstellung, Kronberg, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, W.: ‘On the Status of Arithmetic’, Erkenntnis 14 (1979), 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diederich, W. and Fulda, H.F.: ‘Sneed’sche Strukturen in Marx’ “Kapital”’, Neue Hefte für Philosophie 13 (1978), 47–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulines, C.U.: ‘Cuantificadores existenciales y principios-guia en las teorias fisicas’, Critica 10 (1978), 59–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulines, C.U. and Sneed, J.: ‘Suppes’ Philosophy of Physics’, in R.J. Bogdan (ed.), Patrick Suppes, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979, pp. 59–91.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, J.: The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, 2nd revised edition, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: The Structuralist View of Theories: A Possible Analogue of the Bourbaki Programme in Physical Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niiniluoto, I. (1980). The Growth of Theories: Comments on the Structuralist Approach. In: Hintikka, J., Gruender, D., Agazzi, E. (eds) Theory Change, Ancient Axiomatics, and Galileo’s Methodology. Synthese Library, vol 145. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9045-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9045-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9047-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9045-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics