Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Vienna Circle Collection ((VICC,volume 13))

Abstract

Since antiquity the mind of man has continually been vexed by the question of the infinite. Again and again it has been emphatically denied that anything infinite could exist or that any infinity could be conceived by man: again and again thinkers have arisen who found this perfectly possible. Aristotle had taught that something complete and infinite was in no way possible. The philosophers of the Middle Ages, dominated on the one hand by the authority of Aristotle (whom they styled ‘the Philosopher’ without further qualification) but on the other hand and to at least the same extent by the authority of the Church, never tired of discussing the question how Aristotle’s doctrine of the impossibility of the infinite could be reconciled with the Church’s doctrine of the omnipotence of God. St. Thomas Aquinas, refining and rendering more precise Aristotle’s thesis taught that nothing infinite could be given, whereas not a few of the impressive succession of Schoolmen — particularly the nominalists — defended the opposite thesis.1 A partial result, at all events, was the development of an admirable degree of logical rigour, which was completely lost in succeeding centuries and in many points only regained in the critical mathematics of the nineteenth century.

First published in Alte Probleme — Neue Lösungen in den exakten Wissenschaften, Fünf Wiener Vortrage, Zweiter Zyklus, Leipzig and Vienna, 1934.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Cf. P. Duhem, Études sur Léonard de Vinci, ceux qu’il a lus et ceux qui l’ont lu, Seconde série (Paris, 1909), IX Léonard de Vinci et les deux infinis.

    Google Scholar 

  2. [Principia I.xxvi].

    Google Scholar 

  3. [Letter XIX to Foucher, Philosophische Schriften (ed. Gerhardt) Vol. I, p. 416. This passage is quoted on the title-page of Bolzano, see note 5 below.]

    Google Scholar 

  4. [In a letter to Schumacher quoted by Fraenkel, Einleitung, p. 1 (see note 6 below). Letter of 12 July 1831, Werke Vol. 8, p. 216.]

    Google Scholar 

  5. Die Paradoxien des Unendlichen (Leipzig, 1950), new edition with notes by H. Hahn (Leipzig, 1920) [E. T. Paradoxes of the Infinite (London, 1950)].

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Cantor’s fundamental articles are contained in Georg Cantor, Gesammelte Abhandlungen, ed. E. Zermelo (Berlin, 1932). This volume also contains a portrait of Cantor and a biography composed by A. Fraenkel. For further study of set theory A. Fraenkel’s Einleitung in die Mengenlehre3 (Berlin, 1928) is to be recommended. [E. T. of some of Cantor’s articles in G. Cantor, Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers, tr. P. E. B. Jourdain (London & Chicago, 1915); E. T. of Fraenkel asFoundations of Set Theory (Amsterdam, 1958).]

    Google Scholar 

  7. For sets, M, consisting of one or two members, the rule holds only if one adds to the proper partial sets the empty set (null-set) possessing no members and the set M itself.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For further reading on the continuum problem see W. Sierpiński, Hypothèse du continu (Monografje Matematyczne, Tom. IV (Warsaw & Lvov, 1934). [The problems discussed here and in the next note have been decisively advanced by K. Gödel and P. J. Cohen. The former showed, “The axiom of choice and Cantor’s generalized continuum hypothesis… are consistent with the other axioms of set theory if these axioms are consistent” (The Consistency of the Axiom of Choice &c, Princeton, N. J., 1940, Introduction). The latter showed “that CH [the continuum hypothesis] cannot be proved from ZF [Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory] (with AC [the axiom of choice] included), and that AC cannot be proved from ZF” (Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, New York, 1966 Introduction to Chapter IV)].

    Google Scholar 

  9. For further reading on the axiom of choice see W. Sierpiński, L’axiome de M. Zermelo et son rôle dans la théorie des ensembles et l’analyse. Bull. de l’Acad. des Sciences de Cracovie, Classes des sciences math, et nat., Série A, 1918, pp. 97–152;

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Sierpiński, Leçons sur les nombres transfinis (Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1928). Chap. VI. [See also note 8 above.]

    Google Scholar 

  11. In the series of lectures in aid of a memorial to Ludwig Boltzmann. This lecture was published as H. Hahn, Logik, Mathematik und Naturerkennen (Einheitswissenschaft, No. 2, Vienna 1933). [It will be published in E. T. with the other Einheitswissenschaft pamphlets in a future volume of this Collection.]

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krise und Neuaufbau in den exakten Wissenschaften (Leipzig & Vienna 1933): H. Hahn, “Die Krise der Anschauung” [E. T. Chapter VIII of the present volume.]

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid.: K. Menger, ‘Die neue Logik’ [E. T. Chapter I of his Selected Papers in Logic and Foundations, Didactics, Economics, (Dordrecht, Boston, and London, 1979) in this Collection.]

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cf. A. N. Whitehead and B. Russell, Principia Mathematica 2 (Cambridge, 1925) Vol. I pp. 37ff.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krise und Neuaufbau in den exakten Wissenschaften: G. Nöbeling, ‘Die vierte Dimension und der krumme Raum’.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Poincaré, La Science et lHypothèse (Paris, 1902) [E. T. Science and Hypothesis (London, 1905)].

    Google Scholar 

  17. For what follows see the easily intelligible presentation of A. Haas, Kosmologische Probleme der Physik (Leipzig, 1934) and the detailed but much more difficult one by H. Weyl, Raum, Zeit, Materie 5 (Berlin, 1923) [E. T. Space, Time, Matter (London, 1922)].

    Google Scholar 

  18. We are thus led to mathematical spaces that are three-dimensional analogues of a paraboloid of rotation. Cf. H. Weyl, Raum, Zeit, Materie 5 (Berlin, 1923) p. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  19. The following interpretation is due to E. A. Milne. Cf. A. Haas, Kosmologische Probleme der Physik (Leipzig, 1934) , p. 59

    Google Scholar 

  20. and E. Freundlich, Die Naturwissenschaften 21 (1933) p. 54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Brian McGuinness

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hahn, H. (1980). Does the Infinite Exist?. In: McGuinness, B. (eds) Empiricism, Logic and Mathematics. Vienna Circle Collection, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8982-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8982-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1066-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8982-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics