• Erlinda S. McCrea
Part of the Developments in Oncology book series (DION, volume 2)


Mammography is the roentgenologic examination of the breast. Today it has a definite role in the screening, localization and diagnosis of breast cancer. The purpose of this paper is to review the indications for mammography, the current doses and risks of various techniques, and the mammographic patterns of breast cancer and its differential diagnosis. We will also look into the advantages of needle localization by mammography and the use of specimen radiography.


Breast Cancer Needle Localization Nonpalpable Breast Lesion Nonpalpable Lesion Roentgenologic Examination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Salomon, A, Beitrage zur pathologie and klinik des mammarkaarzinoms. Arch KLIN Chir 101:573–668, 1913Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Warren SL, Roetgenologic study of the breast. Amer J Roentgen 24:113–124, 1930Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Egan, RL, Experience with mammography in a tumor institution: Evaluation of 1000 studies. Radio 75:894–900, 1960Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wolfe, JN, Xerography of the Breast. Radio 91:231–240, 1968Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martin JE, Xeromammography - An improved diagnostic method: Review of 250 biopsied cases. Amer 3 Roentgen 117:90–96, 1973Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wolfe, JN, Xeroradiography of the Breast. 1st ed. Springfield, C. C. Thomas, 1972Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sickles, EA, Benefits and risks of screening mammography. West 3 Med 126:70–71, 1977Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    BCDDP, Preliminary draft report of epidemiology-biostatistics subgroup of the working group to review NCI/ACS BCDDP, Aug 8, 1977Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sadowsky, NL, L Kalisher, G White, and JT Ferrucci, Jr, Radiologic detection of breast cancer - Review and Recommendations. New Engl J Med 294:370–373, 1976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wolfe, JN, Analysis of 462 breast carcinomas. Amer J Roentgen 121:846–853, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frankl, G and M Ackerman, Risk factors and occult breast cancer in young women. Amer J Roentgen 132:427–428, 1979Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robbins, GF and JW Berg, Bilateral primary breast cancers: A prospective clinicopathologic study. Cancer 17:1501–1527, 1964PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    BCDDP, Report of working group to review BCDDP, Sept 6, 1977Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gold, RH, CK Montgomery, and ON Rambo, Significance of Margination of benign and malignant infiltrative mammary lesions: Roentgenographic pathologic correlation. Amer J Roentgen 118:881–894, 1973Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Toombs, BD and L Kalisher, Metastatic disease to the breast: Clinical, pathologic and radiologie features. Amer J Roentgen 129:673–676, 1977Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dodd, GD, Preoperative radiographic localization of nonpalpable lesions, In: Early Breast Cancer, Detection and Treatment, Gallagher, HS (ed.), New York, Wiley, 151–153, 1975Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Libshitz, HI, SA Feig, and S Fetouh, Needle localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. Radio 121:557–560, 1976Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bolmgren, J, B Jacobson, and B Nordenstrom, Stereotaxic instrument for needle biopsy of the mamma. Amer J Roentgen 129:121–125, 1977Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hall, FM and HA Frank, Preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. Amer J Roentgen 132:101–105, 1979Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Egan, JF, CB Sayler, and MJ Goodman, A technique for localizing occult breast lesions. Cancer 26:32–37, 1976Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Horns, JW and RD Arndt, Percutaneous spot localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. Amer J Roentgen 127:253–256, 1976Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kalisher, L, An improved needle for localization for nonpalpable lesions. Radio 128:815–817, 1978Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Egan, RL, Metamorphosis of breast cancer. South Med J 71:1325–1330, 1978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Change, CHJ, JL Sibala, NL Martin, and RC Riley, Film mammography: New low radiation technology. Radio 121:215–217, 1978Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van De Riet, WG and JN Wolfe, Dose reduction in xeroradiography of the breast. Amer J Roentgen 128:821–823, 1977Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ballar, JC III, Mammography: A contrary view. Ann Intern Med 84:77–84, 1976Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Breslow, L, NCI working group on gross and net benefits of mammography in mass screening for the detection of breast cancer. Mar 8, 1977Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv, The Hague 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erlinda S. McCrea
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Maryland HospitalBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations