Skip to main content

Futures Studies Versus Planning

  • Chapter
Can Planning Replace Politics?

Part of the book series: The Van Leer Jerusalem Foundation Series ((JVLF,volume 4))

  • 73 Accesses

Abstract

The growing interest in the study of the future and the increasing number of organizations and commissions in this field, raises the question of how this area of study is to be distinguished from conventional planning. One may wonder about this question, since there would appear to be correspondence, or at least similarity, in that both are future-oriented and express thinking about the future. The thesis of this paper is that despite the similarity between planning and futures studies and their inter-relationship, it is possible and even desirable to distinguish between them, a distinction which has both analytical and practical significance. A conceptual framework based on this distinction will be presented and its implications examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Y. Dror, “A Policy Science’s View of Futures Studies,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2 (1970), p. 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E.S. Cornish, “The Professional Futurist,” in K.R. Jung and J. Galtung, eds., Mankind 2000, Allen and Unwin, London, 1969, p. 247.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Friedmann, “A Conceptual Model for the Analysis of Planning Behavior,” Admin. Sci. Q., September 1967, p. 225.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Dror, “The Planning Process: A Facet Design,” in F.J. Lyden and E.G. Miller, eds., Planning Programming Budgeting, Markham, Chicago, 1967, p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Beer, “The Liberty Machine,” Futures, December 1971, pp. 342–344.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. de Houghton, And Now the Future. A PEP Survey of Futures Studies, PEP, London, 1971, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Young, ed., Forecasting and the Social Sciences, Heinemann, London, 1968, p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Raphaella Bilski Itzhak Galnoor Dan Inbar Yohanan Manor Gabriel Sheffer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shani, M. (1980). Futures Studies Versus Planning. In: Bilski, R., Galnoor, I., Inbar, D., Manor, Y., Sheffer, G. (eds) Can Planning Replace Politics?. The Van Leer Jerusalem Foundation Series, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8857-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8857-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8859-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8857-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics