Statistical Distributions in Scientific Work pp 327-334 | Cite as

# On the Mean Residual Life Function in Survival Studies

## Summary

In reliability studies, the expected additional life time given that a component has survived until time t is called the mean residual life function (MRLF). This MRLF determines the distribution function uniquely. In this paper an interpretation of MRLF in renewal theory is presented and some characterizations of the exponential distribution are obtained. Finally, considering the general MRLF, a method is developed for obtaining the mixing distribution when the original distribution is exponential. Some examples are discussed, in one of which Morrison’s (1978) result is obtained as a special case.

## Key Words

mean residual life function failure rate survival analysis characterizations renewal process mixture## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Balkema, A.A., DeHann, L. (1974). Residual life at great age.
*Annals of Probability*, 2, 792–804.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Blumenthal, S. (1967). Proportional sampling in life length studies.
*Technometrics*, 9, 205–218.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bryson, C., Siddiqui, M.M. (1969). Some criteria for aging.
*Journal of American Statistical Association*, 64, 1472–1483.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Chung, K.L. (1972). The Poisson process as a renewal process.
*Periodica Mathematica Hungarica*, 2, 41–48.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cinlar, E., Jagers, P. (1973). Two mean values which characterize the Poisson process.
*Journal of Applied Probability*, 10, 678–681.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cox, D.R. (1962).
*Renewal Theory*. Methuen, London.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - Feller, W. (1971).
*An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications*( second edition ). Wiley, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - Gupta, R.C. (1975). On characterization of distributions by conditional expectations.
*Communications in Statistics*, 4, 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gupta, R.C., (1979). On the characterization of survival distributions in reliability by properties of their renewal densities.
*Communications in Statistics A*, 8, 685–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hollander, W., Proschan, F. (1975). Tests for the mean residual life.
*Biometrika*, 62, 585–593.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Holmes, P.T. (1974). Another characterization of the Poisson process.
*Sankhya A*, 36, 449–450.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - Laurent, A.G. (1974). On characterization of some distributions by truncated properties.
*Journal of the American Statistical Association*, 69, 823–827.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mahfoud, M. (1977).
*Study of weighted distributions and size-biased sampling*. Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar - Meilijson, I. (1972). Limiting properties of the mean residual life time function.
*Annals of Mathematical Statistics*, 43, 354–357.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Morrison, D.G. (1978). On linearly increasing mean residual life times.
*Journal of Applied Probability*, 15, 617–620.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Muth, E.J. (1977). Reliability models with positive memory derived from the mean residual life function. In
*Theory and Applications of Reliability*, C.P. Tsokos, I.N. Shimi, eds. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar - Ratnaparkhi, M.V. (1981). On multivariate splitting model and related characterizations of some statistical distributions. In
*Statistical Distributions in Scientific Work*, C. Taillie, G. P. Patil, B. Baldessari, eds. Reidel, Dordrecht-Holland. Vol. 4, pp. 357–364.Google Scholar - Scheaffer, R.L. (1972). Size biased sampling.
*Technometrics*, 14, 635–644.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Watson, G.S., Wells, W.T. (1961). On the possibility of improving the mean useful life of items by eliminating those with short lives.
*Technometrics*, 3, 281–298.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Weiss, G. A. and Dishan, M. (1971). Some economics problems related to burn in programs.
*IEEE Transactions on Reliability*, R-20, 190–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar