Skip to main content

The Limits of Theater

  • Chapter
Book cover The Unhappy Consciousness

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 13))

  • 102 Accesses

Abstract

In the traditional criticism Beckett’s plays have, from the beginning, been dubbed “experimental”; and Godot’s failure in Miami proved that a profound tragic sense can become confused when it is expressed in surface ironic humor. That experience should have proved only that Beckett was never the victim of the inauthentic plights of his heroes. Although the Miami fiasco was in a sense tragic, it was a natural consequence of an inept reading and of the ridiculous commercialism of the American theater. In spite of his multifarious uses of the “convenience” of philosophy to structure his fictional worlds, his own world view remains a matter of conjecture, unimportant for the interpretation of his works; and Godot’s reception in Miami1 touched his actors more than it did Beckett himself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See the account of same, supra, Ch. VIII.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Heidegger, Being and Time, pp. 91 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Ibid., pp. 96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heidegger has made this commentary on his own principal work in criticism of Sartre’s use of it. See his Über den Humanismus (Frankfurt am Main: Klosterman, 1946) pp. 15–16. See also Being and Time, p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Drama tische Dich tungen, II, p. 515.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Heidegger, Being and Time, pp. 171–72.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Come and Go,’ in Breath and Other Shorts (London: Faber and Faber, 1971), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  9. That was in the French version; in the original English, the expression was toned down to the startled ‘Oh!’ — Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  10. In English, ‘God grant not.’ - Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., p. 21; the characterizations of these seven positions as determinations of the developing drama are my own.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See the original version, Le Visible et Vinvisible (Paris: Gallimard, 1964), pp. 252, 268,316,317–18,321.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaelin, E.F. (1981). The Limits of Theater. In: The Unhappy Consciousness. Analecta Husserliana, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8522-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8522-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8524-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8522-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics