Semantics and Pragmatics in Psycho-Physiological Context
- 101 Downloads
For many theoretical linguists and applied logicians, model theoretic semantics à la Montague, Cresswell a. o. seems to represent the most advanced stage of the theory of semantics and pragmatics. But it should be clear that this theory remains in the context of realistic semantic theories, as v. Kutschera has called them. Such theories “interpret meaning as a conventional relationship between signs and concrete or conceptual entities which exist independently of the linguistic signs” (v. Kutschera, 1975, p. 19). These theories may still be called realistic theories even if they no longer assume, as in the classical position, that the meaning of a linguistic expression does not depend on conditions of use. In fact, modern model theoretic analyses can account for the variations dependent on conditions of use. The pragmatic account of the context is, however, “realistically” semanticized.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bierwisch, M.: 1980, ‘Utterance meaning and mental states’, in F. Klix (ed.), Memory and Cognition, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Kleene, S. C.: 1956, ‘Representation of events in nerve nets and finite automata’, in C. E. Shannon, J. McCarthy (eds.) Automata Studies, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, pp. 3–42.Google Scholar
- Kutschera, F. von: 1975, Philosophy of Language, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
- Schnelle, H.: 1980b, ‘Phenomenological analysis of language and its application to time and tense’, in J. Parret et al. (eds.) Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.Google Scholar
- Schnelle, H. 1980c, ‘Introspection and the description of language use’, in F. Coulmas (ed.) Native Speaker Festschrift, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar