Advertisement

Electrocardiographic Diagnostic Dilemmas in Myocardial Ischemia and Infarction

  • W. J. Mandel
  • C. T. Peter
  • I. Hoffman

Abstract

Since Einthoven’s description of the electrocardiogram, the utility of this diagnostic tool has increased rapidly as clinical experience has spread. Nevertheless, the electrophysiologic basis of the normal human electrocardiogram has lagged far behind the clinical expansion of the ECG. Description of normal phenomenon and abnormal rhythms was rapidly forthcoming but it has been only after many decades of use that the clinician has become increasingly aware of some of the pitfalls and diagnostic dilemmas which present themselves as electrocardiographic problems. This chapter deals specifically with the potential difficulties that the clinician might observe in the electrocardiographic assessment of myocardial infarction.

Keywords

Action Potential Duration Left Bundle Branch Block Mitral Valve Prolapse Right Bundle Branch Block Blunt Chest Trauma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sodi-Pallares D, et al: The activation of the interventricular septum. Am Heart J 41:569, 1951.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scher AM, Young AC: The pathway of ventricular depolarization in the dog. Circ Res 4:461, 1965.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Durrer D, et al: Total excitation of the human heart. Circulation 41:895, 1970.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Samson WE, Scher AM: Mechanism of S-T segment alteration during acute myocardial injury. Circ Res 8:780, 1960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Dam RT, Durrer D: The T wave and ventricular repolarization. Am J Cardiol 14:294, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Toyoshima H, et al: The nature of normal and abnormal electrocardiograms. VOL Relation of ST segment and T wave changes to intracellular potentials. Arch Intern Med 1 15:4, 1965.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mandel WJ, et al: Analysis of T wave abnormalities associated with myocardial infarction using a theoretic model. Circulation 38:178, 1968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kléber AG, et al: Mechanisms and time course of ST-T and T-segment changes during acute regional ischemia in the pig heart. Circ Res 42:603, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dressler W, Roesler H: Electrocardiographic changes in funnel chest. Am Heart J 40:877, 1950.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Perloff JK: The clinical recognition of congenital heart disease. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1970.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Broadbent JC, et al: Congenital deficiency of the pericardium. Dis Chest 50:237, 1966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Giknis FL: The electrocardiogram in spontaneous pneumothorax. JAMA 199:183, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nora TR, Pilz CG: Pseudoinfarction pattern associated with electrolyte disturbance. Arch Intern Med 104:300, 1959.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harthorne JW, et al: Traumatic myocardial infarction: report of a Case with normal coronary arteriogram. Ann Intern Med 66:341, 1967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Resnekov L: Present status of electroversion in the management of cardiac dysrhythmias. Circulation 47:1356, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    DeLeon AC, et al: Distinctive electrocardiogram of Duchenne’s progressive muscular dystrophy: an Electrocardiographic-pathologic correlative study. Am J Med 42:179, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buja LM, Khoi NB, Roberts WC: Clinically significant cardiac amyloidosis: clinicopathologic findings in fifteen patients. Am Heart J 26:394, 1970.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tugan SK, Mau RD, Schwartz MJ: Anterior myocardial infarction patterns in the mitral valve prolapse -systolic click syndrome. Am Heart J 58:719, 1975.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Myers GB, et al: Normal variations in multiple precordial leads. Am Heart J 34:785, 1947.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spodick DH: Differential characteristics of the electrocardiogram in early repolarization and acute * pericarditis. N Engl J Med 295:523, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clements SD, Huest JW: Diagnostic value of electrocardiographic abnormalities observed in subjects accidentally exposed to cold. Am J Cardiol 29:729, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Osborn JJ: Experimental hypothermia: respiratory and blood pH changes in relation to cardiac function. Am J Physiol 175:389, 1953.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Surawicz B: Quantitative study of the electrocardiographic pattern of hypokalemia. Circulation 16:750, 1957.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Biberman L, Sarma RN, Surawicz B: T-wave abnormalities during hyperventilation and isoproterenol infusion. Am Heart J 8L 166, 1977.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yu PNG, Yim BJB, Stanfiels CA: Hyperventilation syndrome. Arch Intern Med 103:902, 1959.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Campbell M: Inversion of T waves after long paroxysm of tachycardia. Br Heart J 4:49, 1942.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Burch GE, Meyers R, Abildskov JA: A new electrocardiographic pattern observed in cerebrovascular accidents. Circulation 9:719, 1954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Abildskov JA, et al: The electrocardiogram and the central nervous system. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 13:210, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chatterjee K, et al: T wave changes after artificial pacing. Lancet 1:759, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wellins HJJ, Bär FW, Gorgels AP, Vanag GE: Use of Ajmaline in patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome to disclose short refractory period of the accessory pathway. Am J Cardiol 45:130, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. J. Mandel
  • C. T. Peter
  • I. Hoffman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations