Abstract
In his article, “Creative Product and Creative Process in science and Art,” Larry Briskman argues that any theory of creativity must hold creative products as logically prior to creative processes. His general idea is that one cannot identify what a creative process is unless one begins with its results. The argumentative burden, then, falls on answering the question, what is a creative product?
This essay is a version of one presented to the Eastern Division of the Society for the Philosophy of Creativity, American Philosophical Association, Washington, D.C., December, 1978. It is dedicated to Constance Costigan and to the memory of my father, Laszlo Krausz (1903–1979).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
E.H. Gombrich, Art and Illusion (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969).
Karl R. Popper, Objective Knowledge (New York: Oxford University Press, 1975).
Karl R. Popper, Upended Quest (LaSalle: Open Court, 1976).
K.R. Popper and J.C. Eccles, The Self and Its Brain (New York: Springer, 1977).
Ursula Meyer, Conceptual Art (New York: E.P. Dutton, 1972), p. ix.
6. Meyer, p. xv.
Popper and Eccles, op. cit., p. 91.
I am grateful to James Munz for this formulation. See Leopardo 13 (1980): 350.
A.H. Maslow, Religions, Values, and Peak Experiences (New York: Viking Press, 1963).
J.N. Findlay, “The Perspicuous and the Poignant,” in Aesthetics, Harold Osborne, ed. (London: Oxford University Press, 1972).
Harold Rosenberg, “The American Action Painters,” Art News 51 (1952}: 22–23, 48, emphasis added.
John Dewey, Art As Experience (New York: Capricorn Books, 1934), p. 35.
F. Gilot and C. Lake, Life With Picasso (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964), pp. 68–69.
John Dewey, op, cit., p.19.
Chang Chung-yuan, Creativity and Taoism: A Study of Chinese Philosophy, Art, and Poetry (New York: Harper Colophon Books, 1970), pp. 203–204.
See E. Fromm, To Have or To Be? (New York: Harper and Row, 1976).
John Albin Broyer, Letter to the Editor, Leonardo 13 (1980): 350.
David Carrier, Letter to the Editor, Leonardo 13 (1980): 262.
James Munz, Letter to the Editor: Leonardo 13 (1980): 350.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krausz, M. (1981). Creating and Becoming. In: Dutton, D., Krausz, M. (eds) The Concept Of Creativity Science Art. Martinus Nijhoff Philosophy Library, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8230-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8230-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8232-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8230-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive