Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Martinus Nijhoff Philosophy Library ((MNPL,volume 6))

Abstract

The enterprise that I am undertaking here has been severely discouraged by contemporary philosophers. They do not deny that the imagination can produce new ideas which help the pursuit of science or that our personal hunches and intuitions are often to the point. But since our imagination can roam unhindered by argument and our intuitions cannot be accounted for, neither imagination nor intuition are deemed rational ways of making discoveries. They are excluded from the logic of scientific discovery, which can deal then only with the verification or refutation of ideas after they have turned up as possible contributions to science.

Reprinted from Chemical and Engineering News 44 (1966): 85-93. @ 1966 American Chemical Society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See H. Dingle, The Scientific Adventure (London: Pitman, 1952), p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See F.W. Snyder and N.H. Pronko, Vision with Spatial Inversion (Wichita: University of Wichita Press, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For fuller evidence and its interpretation in the sense given here, see H. Kottenhoff, “Was ist richtiges Sehen mit Umkehrbrillen and in welchem Sinne stellt sich das Sehen um?,” Psychologia Universalis 5 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See P.A. Schilpp, ed., Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist (New York: Tudor, 1951), p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See A. Grünbaum, Philosophical Problems of Space and Time (New York: Knopf, 1963), pp. 378–385.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See R.F. Hefferline et al, “Escape and Avoidance Conditioning in Human Subjects Without Their Observation of the Response,” Science 130 (1959): 1338–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R.F. Hefferline, “Learning Theory in Clinical Psychology,” in Experimental Foundations of Clinical Psychology, ed. A.J. Bachrach (New York: Basic Books, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Arthur Koestler, The Sleepwalkers (London: Hutchinson, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., p. 334.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., p. 316.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958), pp. 150–160.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Schilpp, op. cit., p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Polanyi, M. (1981). The Creative Imagination. In: Dutton, D., Krausz, M. (eds) The Concept Of Creativity Science Art. Martinus Nijhoff Philosophy Library, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8230-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8230-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8232-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8230-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics