Skip to main content

Some Macroeconomic Impacts of the National Industrial Recovery Act, 1933–1935

  • Chapter
The Great Depression Revisited

Part of the book series: Rochester Studies in Economics and Policy Issues ((RSEP,volume 2))

Abstract

With these words, President Roosevelt signed the National Industrial Recovery Act on June 16, 1933, and so began an unprecedented two-year experiment in regulating the entire U.S. economy. Between June 1933 and May 1935, staggering reforms were promulgated in the quest for economic recovery and reform. Of course, other New Deal legislation, also signed during the famous “100 days,” had similar objectives.1 The NIRA promised to extract the United States from the continuing depression through cooperative action: promoting cartels to aid industry and promoting unions to aid employees. Within one year, codes of “fair competition” for 450 individual industries, covering 23 million workers, were passed. By the time the law was declared unconstitutional on May 27, 1935, over 550 codes had been passed covering almost the entire private, nonagricultural economy.2

History will probably record the NIRA as the most important and far-reaching legislation ever enacted by the American Congress.

Schlesinger (1959, p. 102)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alchian, A. A. 1970. “Information Costs, Pricing, and Resource Unemployment.” In Microeconomic Foundations of Employment and Inflation Theory, ed. E. S. Phelps. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E. C. 1956. “Fiscal Policies in the Thirties: A Reappraisal.”American Economic Review 46: 857–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, K., and Meltzer, A. 1963. “Predicting Velocity: Implications for Theory and Policy”. Journal of Finance 18: 319–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filipetti, G., and Vaile, R. 1935. The Economic Effects of the NRA: A Regional Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., and Schwartz, A. J. 1963. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, for the National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, G., and Klein, L. R. 1976. “The NBER/NSF Model Comparison Seminar: An Analysis of Results.” In Econometric Model Performance, ed. L. R. Klein and E. Burmeister. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandolfi, A. E. 1974. “Stability of the Demand for Money during the Great Contraction—1929–1933.” Journal of Political Economy 82: 969–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, E. W. 1966. The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, B. G., and Coen, R. M. 1976. An Annual Growth Model of the U.S. Economy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L. R., and Goldberger, A. S. 1955. An Econometric Model of the United States, 1929–1952. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidler, D. 1966. “The Rate of Interest and the Demand for Money: Some Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Political Economy 14: 545–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1977. The Demand for Money: Theories and Evidence. New York: Dun-Donnelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebergott, S. 1964. Manpower in Economic Growth: The American Record since 1800. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, L. S., et al. 1935. The National Recovery Administration: An Analysis and Appraisal. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roose, K. D. 1954. The Economics of Recession and Revival. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, A. M., Jr. 1969. The Coming of the New Deal. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teigen, R. 1964. “Demand and Supply Functions for Money in the United States.” Econometrica 32: 477–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. National Recovery Administration. N.d. Minimum Price Regulation under Codes of Fair Competition. Trade Practice Study No. 56. Washington, D.C.: NRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1937. Report of the President’s Committee of Industrial Analysis. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. M. 1978. “Some Redistributive and Macroeconomic Impacts of the National Industrial Recovery Act, 1933–1935.” Ph.D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 University of Rochester Center for Research in Government Policy and Business

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weinstein, M.M. (1981). Some Macroeconomic Impacts of the National Industrial Recovery Act, 1933–1935. In: Brunner, K. (eds) The Great Depression Revisited. Rochester Studies in Economics and Policy Issues, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8135-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8135-5_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8137-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8135-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics