Skip to main content

Biomedical Knowledge: Progress and Priorities

  • Chapter
Book cover New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 10))

  • 50 Accesses

Abstract

In the present essay I am going to begin with some comments on the essays of Professors Weissmann [24] and Wartofsky [22]. I will then go on to develop the outlines of what I take to be a more realistic and adequate picture of the process of genesis, dissemination, and application of biomedical knowledge in the context of the current system of health care and in medical research institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Brooks, H.: 1978, ‘The Problem of Research Priorities’, Daedalus 107, 171–190.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Daniels, N.: 1979, ‘Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance’, Journal of Philosophy 76, 256–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dewey, J.: 1939, Theory of Valuation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, I II.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dewey, J.: 1951, ‘Experience, Knowledge and Value: A Rejoinder’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of John Dewey, 2nd ed., Tudor, New York, pp. 18–35.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dewey, J.: 1960, Theory of the Moral Life, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York. (This is a reprint of part II of Dewey and Tuft’s revised edition of their Ethics.)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Federal Register 43, No. 146, July 28,1978, Part IV.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goodfield, J.: 1977, Playing God: Genetic Engineering and the Manipulation of Life, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Green, H.P.: 1977, ‘The Boundaries of Scientific Freedom’, Newsletter on Science, Technology and Human Values 20, 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harman, G.: 1978, ‘Using Intuitions about Knowledge to Study Reasoning’, Journal of Philosophy 75, 433–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harman, G.: 1980, ‘Reasoning and Explanatory Coherence’, American Philosophical Quarterly 17, 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jonas, H.: 1976, ‘Freedom of Scientific Inquiry: The Accountability of Science’, The Hastings Center Report 6 (August), 15–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones] Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. Saikewicz, 373 Mass. 728, 373 N.E. 2nd 417 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Levi, E. H.: 1949, An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 111.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Metzger, W. P.: 1978, ‘Academic Freedom and Scientific Freedom’, Daedalus 107, 93–114.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Monod, J.: 1970, Chance and Necessity, Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nagel, T.: 1977, ‘The Fragmentation of Value’, in H. T. Engelhardt, Jr. and D. Callahan (eds.), Knowledge, Value and Belief, Hastings Center, Hastings-on- Hudson, New York, pp. 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schaffner, K. F.: 1977, ‘Reduction, Reductionism, Values and Progress in the Biomedical Sciences’, in R. Colodny (ed.), Logic, Laws and Life, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 143–171.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shannon, J. A.: 1976, ‘Federal Support of Biomedical Sciences: Development and Academic Impact’, Journal of Medical Education 51, 1–98.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shaw, W. H.: 1980, ‘Intuition and Moral Philosophy’, American Philosophical Quarterly 17, 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stevens, R.: 1971, American Medicine and the Public Interest, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wartofsky, M.: 1982, ‘Medical Knowledge as a Social Product: Rights, Risks, and Responsibilities’, in this volume, pp. 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Watson, J. D.: 1968, The Double Helix, Atheneum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weissmann, G.: 1982, ‘The Need to Know: Utilitarian and Esthetic Values of Biomedical Science’, in this volume, pp. 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schaffner, K.F. (1982). Biomedical Knowledge: Progress and Priorities. In: Bondeson, W.B., Tristram Engelhardt, H., Spicker, S.F., White, J.M. (eds) New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7723-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7723-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7725-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7723-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics