Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methods and models for studying tumor invasion

  • Chapter
Book cover Tumor Invasion and Metastasis

Part of the book series: Developments in Oncology ((DION,volume 7))

Abstract

Invasion is the process whereby cells of one type penetrate into the interior of a tissue containing cells or a different type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sträuli P, Barrett AJ, Baici A (eds): Proteinases and tumor invasion. New York: Raven Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong PB: Cellular positional stability and intercellular invasion. Bioscience 27:803–808, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ossowski L, Reich E: Loss of malignancy during serial passage of human carcinoma in culture and discordance between malignancy and transformation parameters. Cancer Res 40:2310–2315, 1980.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart HL, Dunn TB, Snell KC, Deringer MK: Tumours of the respiratory tract. In: Pathology of tumours in laboratory animals, Turusov VS (ed). Lyon: International Agency for Research, 1979, pp 251–268.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander P: Back to the drawing board - the need for more realistic model systems for immunotherapy. Cancer 40:467–470, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fidler IJ: General considerations for studies of experimental cancer metastasis. Methods Cancer Res XIV:399–439, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fidler IJ, Kripke ML: Tumor cell antigenicity, host immunity and cancer metastasis. Cancer Immunol Immunotherapy 7:201–205, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fidler IJ, Gersten DM, Hart IR: The biology of cancer invasion and metastasis. Adv Cancer Res 28:149–250, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hewitt HB: The choice of animal tumors for experimental studies of cancer therapy. Adv Cancer Res 27:149–200, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Poste G, Fidler IJ: The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis. Nature 283:139–146, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Noweli PC: The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science 194:23–28, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fogh J, Giovanella BC (eds): The nude mouse in experimental and clinical research. New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hanna N, Fidler IJ: Expression of metastatic potential of allogeneic and xenogeneic neoplasms in young nude mice. Cancer Res 41:438–444, 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hart IR, Fidler IJ: An in vitro quantitative assay for tumor cell invasion. Cancer Res 38:3218–3224, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hart IR: The selection and characterization of an invasive variant of B16 melanoma. Am J Pathol 97:587–600, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Poste G, Doll J, Hart IR, Fidler IJ: In vitro selection of murine B16 melanoma variants with enhanced tissue invasive properties. Cancer Res 40:1636–1644, 1980.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fidler IJ, Kripke ML: Metastasis results from pre-existing variant cells within a malignant tumor. Science 197:893–895, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Enders JF, Diamandopoulos GT: A study of variation and progression in oncogenicity in an SV 40-transformed hamster heart cell line and its clones. Proc Roy Soc (Biol) 171:431–443, 1969.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kripke ML, Gruys E, Fidler IJ: Metastatic heterogeneity of cells from an ultraviolet light- induced murine fibrosarcoma of recent origin. Cancer Res 2962–2967, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Suzuki N, Withers RN, Koehler MW: Heterogeneity and variability of artificial lung colony-forming ability among clones from mouse fibrosarcoma. Cancer Res 38:3349–3351, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Poste G, Doll J, Fidler IJ: Interactions between clonal subpopulations affect the stability of the metastatic phenotype in polyclonal populations of B16 melanoma cells. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fidler IJ, Nicolson GL: The immunobiology of experimental metastatic melanoma. Cancer Biol Rev 2:1–53, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miller FR, Heppner GH: Immunologic heterogeneity of tumor cell subpopulations from a single mouse mammary tumor. J Nat Cancer Inst 63:1457–1463, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller BE, Miller FR, Leith J, Heppner GH: Growth interaction in vivo between tumor subpopulations derived from a single mouse mammary tumor. Cancer Res 40:3977–3981, 1980.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. DeWys WD: Studies correlating the growth rate of a tumor and its metastases and providing evidence for tumor-related systemic growth-retarding factors. Cancer Res 32:374–379, 1972.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gorelik E, Fogel M, Segal S, Feldman M: Tumor-associated antigenic differences between the primary and the descendant metastatic tumor cell population. J Supramol Struct 12:385–402, 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Greene HSN, Harvey GK: The inhibitory influence of a transplanted hamster lymphoma on metastasis. Cancer Res 20:1094–1100. 1960.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yuhas JM, Pazmino NH: Inhibition of subcutaneously growing line 1 carcinomas due to metastatic spread. Cancer Res 34:2005–2010, 1974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Poste G: The cell surface and metastasis. In: Cancer invasion and metastasis: biological mechanisms and therapy, Day SB (ed). New York: Raven Press, 1977, pp 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Van Rooijen N: Labeling of lymphocytes with various radioisotopes for in vivo tracer studies; a review. J Immunol Methods 15:267–277, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mareel M, DeBruyne G, DeRidder L: Invasion of malignant cells into 51Cr-labeled host tissues in organotypical culture. Oncology 34:6–9, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Liotta LA, Vembu D, Saini RK, Boone C: In vivo monitoring of the death rate of artificial murine pulmonary micrometastases. Cancer Res 38:1231–1236, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Poste G, Nicolson GL: Arrest and metastasis of blood-borne tumor cells are modified by fusion of plasma membrane vesicles from highly metastatic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:399–403, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Liotta LA, Lee CW, Morakis DJ: New method for preparing large surfaces of intact human basement membrane for tumor invasion studies. J Nat Cancer Inst (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pretlow TG, II, Pretlow TP: Separation of individual kinds of cells from tumors. In: Contemporary topics in immunobiology, Volume 10, Witz IP, Hanna MG, Jr (eds). New York: Plenum, 1980, pp 21–60.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Russell SW, Gillespie GY, Pace JL: Evidence for mononuclear phagocytes in solid neoplasms and appraisal of their nonspecific cytotoxic capabilities. In: Contemporary topics in immunobiology, Volume 10, Witz IP, Hanna MG, Jr (eds). New York: Plenum, 1980, pp 143–166.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mareel MMK: Is invasiveness in vitro characteristic of malignant cells? Cell Biol Int Reports 3:627–640, 1979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mareel M, Bruyneel E, DeBruyne G, Dragonetti G: Methods for morphological and biochemical analysis of invasion in vitro. In: Cell movement and neoplasia, De Brabander M, Mareel M, DeRidder L (eds). Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1979, pp 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Armstrong PB, Lackie JM: Studies of intercellular invasion in vitro using rabbit peritoneal neutrophil granulocytes (PMNs) I. Role of contact inhibition of locomotion. J Cell Biol 65:439–462, 1975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. DeCossE JJ, Gossens C, Kuzuma JF, Unsworth BR: Embryonic inductive tissue interactions that cause histologic differentiation of murine mammary carcinoma in vitro. J Nat Cancer Inst 54:913–922, 1975.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Trinkaus JP: On the mechanism of metazoan cell movements. In: The cell surface in animal embryogenesis and development. Cell Surface Reviews, Volume 1, Poste G, Nicolson GL (eds). Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1976, pp 225–329.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Armstrong PB: Invasiveness of neutrophil leukocytes. In: Cell movement and neoplasis, De Brabander M, Mareel M, De Ridder L (eds). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1980, pp 131–151.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hart IR, Raz A, Fidler IJ: Effect of cytoskeleton-disrupting agents on the metastatic behavior of malanoma cells. J Nat cancer Inst 64:891–900, 1980.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Weiss L: Cell deformability: some general considerations. In: Fundamental aspects of metastasis, Weiss, L (ed). Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1976, pp 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sato H, Suzuki M: Deformability and viability of tumor cells by transcapillary passage, with reference to organ affinity of metastasis in cancer. In: Fundamental aspects of metastasis, Weiss L (ed). Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1976, pp 311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lessin LS, Kurantsin-Mills J, Weems HB: Deformability of normal and sickle erythrocytes in a pressure-flow filtration system. Blood Cells 3:241–262, 1977.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Maslow DE: In vitro analysis of surface specificity in embryonic cells. In: The cell surface in animal embryogenesis and development, Poste G, Nicolson GL (eds). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1976, pp 697–745.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Easty DM, Easty GC: An in vitro model for studying cell invasiveness. In: Organ culture in biomedical research, Balls M, Monnickendam M (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976, pp 379–393.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schirrmacher V, Shantz G, Clauer K, Komitowski D, Zimmermann HP, Lohmann-Matthes M-L: Tumor metastases and cell-mediated immunity in a model system in DBA/2 mice I. Tumor invasive-ness in vitro and metastasis formation in vivo. Int J Cancer 23:233–244, 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Warren BA: The vascular morphology of tumors. In: Tumor blood circulation, Peterson H-I (ed). Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1980, pp 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. G. Poste
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

    L. A. Liotta

  2. Frederick Cancer Research Center, Frederick, Maryland, USA

    I. R. Hart

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague/Boston/London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poste, G. (1982). Methods and models for studying tumor invasion. In: Liotta, L.A., Hart, I.R. (eds) Tumor Invasion and Metastasis. Developments in Oncology, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7511-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7511-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7513-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7511-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation