Experiments and analyses: a retrospect

  • R. M. Kenedi
  • T. Gibson


Retrospective evaluation highlights the shortcomings of present-day efforts in analyses, particularly in clinical applicability. The load-deformation behaviour of the soft tissues is non-linear and time dependent, and it now seems clear that present attempts to describe the biomechanical behaviour of such living entities in terms of the mathematical concepts and techniques used for non-biological materials have failed.

A reorientation to alternative formulations requiring more effective collaboration between experimentalists and mathematicians than before is necessary to produce genuine progress. Hopefully this will go hand in hand with the re-establishment of the clinical problems of the human patient as both the start and the ultimate aim of all research.


Biomechanical Behaviour Living Entity Skin Tension Generalize Functional Form Imperial Academy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kenedi, R. M., Gibson, T., Evans, J. H. and Barbenel, J. C. (1975). Tissue mechanics. Phys. Med. Biol 20, 699.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barbenel, J. C. (1979). Time dependent mechanical properties of skin. PhD Thesis, University of StrathclydeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gibson, T. (1978). Translator, editor and annotator of ‘On the Anatomy of Physiology of the Skin’ by Professor K. Langer, 1861. The Imperial Academy of Science, Vienna. Br. J. Plastic Surg. 31, 93, 273Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evans, J. H. (1973). Structure and function—the influence on connective tissue mechanics of tissue contours and their micro-architecture. PhD Thesis University of StrathclydeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barbenel, J. C., Makki, S. and Agache, P. (1979). The variability of skin surface contours. (In preparation)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lanir, Y. and Fung, Y. C. (1974). Two-dimensional mechanical properties of rabbit skin-I. Experimental system-II. Experiment results. J. Biomechanics, 7, 29, 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morgan, F. R. (1960). The mechanical properties of collagen fibres: stress-strain curves. J. Soc. Leather Trades Chemists, 44, 170Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kenedi, R. M., Gibson, T. and Daly, C. H. (1964). Bioengineering studies of the human skin. In Jackson, S. F., Harkness, J. M. and Tristram, G. R. (eds.) Structure and Function of Connective and Skeletal Tissue. (London, Butterworth)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ridge, M. D. and Wright, V. (1964). The description of skin stiffness. Biorheology, 2, 67Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fung, Y. C. B. (1967). Elasticity of soft tissues in simple elongation. Am. J. Physiol. 213,1532PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tong, P. and Fung. Y. C. (1976). The stress strain relationship for the skin. J. Biomechanics, 9, 649CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© MTP Press Limited 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. M. Kenedi
  • T. Gibson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations