Synopsis
Five species of relatively large surfperches (Embiotocidae) exploit the small prey in benthic ‘turf’ on a kelp-forested reef off southern California. Turf contained inorganic debris and ‘items of doubtful food value’ (plants, colonial animals, etc.) which fish mostly rejected, and ‘items of food value’ (amphipods, etc.) which they selected. In mode of food handling, two species selected their food by taking careful bites and swallowing all items, either by picking out small amphipods etc. from algae or plucking larger prey and crushing it between strong pharyngeal teeth. The three others selected food by winnowing bites of turf in their mouth and spitting out the cast. For each species, distribution of foraging effort among microhabitats differed significantly from random, for one species more noticeably so than for the others. All species generally preferred microhabitats with highest densities of valued food items. All but one foraged during the day only. Functional morphological specializations may constrain their foraging modes and diets. The presumed most generalized mode is ‘browser-picker’; ‘crunching’ and ‘oral-winnowing’ are more specialized. The surfperches’ elaborate pharyngognathy is a likely basis of these specializations for greater foraging efficiency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References cited
Alevizon, W.S. 1975a. Spatial overlap and competition in congeneric surfperches (Embiotocidae) off Santa Barbara, California. Copeia 1975: 352–356.
Alevizon, W.S. 1975b. Comparative feeding ecology of a kelpbed embiotocid (Embiotoca lateralis). Copeia 1975: 608–615.
Barlow, G.W. & J.W. Munsey. 1976. The red devil — midas — arrow cichlid species complex in Nicaragua, pp. 359–369. In: T.B. Thorson (ed.) Investigations of the Ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan Lakes, School of Life Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
Brett, J.R. 1979. Some morphological and behavioural adaptations of pile perch (Rhacochilus vacca) feeding on mussels (Mytilus edulis). Can. J. Zool. 57: 658–664.
Chao, L.N. & J.A. Musick. 1977. Life history, feeding habits, and functional morphology of juvenile sciaenid fishes in the York River Estuary, Virginia. U.S. Fish. Bull 75: 657–702.
Chess, J.R. 1969. An airlift sampling device for benthic organisms. Research Memo 69-151-Ocean-Ml, Westinghouse Res. Lab., Pittsburg.
DeMartini, E.E. 1969. A correlative study of the ecology and comparative feeding mechanism morphology of the Embiotocidae (surf-fishes) as evidence of the family’s adaptive radiation into available ecological niches. Wasmann J. Biol. (Univ. San Francisco) 27: 177–247.
Ebeling, A.W. 1957. The dentition of eastern Pacific mullets, with special reference to adaptation and taxonomy. Copeia 1957: 173–185.
Ebeling, A.W. & R.N. Bray. 1976. Day versus night activity of reef fishes in a kelp forest off Santa Barbara, California, U.S. Fish. Bull. 74: 703–718.
Ebeling, A.W., R.J. Larson & W.S. Alevizon. 1980a. Habitat groups and island-mainland distribution of kelp-bed fishes off Santa Barbara, California, pp. 403–431. In. D.M. Power (ed.) Multidisciplinary Symposium on the California Islands, Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara.
Ebeling, A.W., R.J. Larson, W.S. Alevizon & R.N. Bray. 1980b. Annual variability of reef-fish assemblages in kelp forests off Santa Barbara, California, U.S. Fish. Bull. 78: 361–377.
Eigenmann, C.H. 1894. Cymatogaster aggregata Gibbons: a contribution to the ontogeny of viviparous fishes. Bull. U.S. Fish Commission for 1892 12: 401–478.
Ellison, J.P., C. Terry & J.S. Stephens, Jr. 1979. Food resource utilization among five species of embiotocids at King Harbor, California, with preliminary estimates of caloric intake. Mar. Biol. 52: 161–169.
Emlen, J.M. 1968. Optimal choice in animals. Amer. Nat. 102: 385–389.
Gatz, A.J., Jr. 1979. Community organization in fishes as indicated by morphological features. Ecology 60: 711–718.
Griffiths, D. 1980. Foraging costs and relative prey size. Amer. Nat. 116: 743–752.
Haldorson, L. & M. Moser. 1979. Geographic patterns of prey utilization in two species of surfperch (Embiotocidae). Copeia 1979: 567–572.
Hiatt, R.W. & D.W. Strasburg. 1960. Ecological relationships of the fish fauna on coral reefs of the Marshall Islands. Ecol. Monogr. 30: 65–127.
Hixon, M.A. 1980. Competitive interactions between California reef fishes of the genus Embiotoca. Ecology 61: 918–931.
Hixon, M.A. 1981. An experimental analysis of territoriality in the California reef fish Embiotoca jacksoni (Embiotocidae). Copeia 1981: 653–665.
Ivlev, V.S. 1961. Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes (English transí, from Russian by D. Scott). Yale Univ. Press, New Haven. 302 pp.
Jones, R.S. 1968. Ecological relationships in Hawaiian and Johnston Island Acanthuridae (surgeonfishes). Micronesica 4: 309–361.
Keast, A. & D. Webb. 1966. Mouth and body form relative to feeding ecology in the fish fauna of a small lake, Lake Opinicon, Ontario, J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 25: 1845–1874.
Keenleyside, M.H.A. 1979. Diversity and adaptation in fish behavior. Springer-Verlag, New York. 208 pp.
Liem, K.F. & P.H. Greenwood. 1981. A functional approach to the phylogeny of the pharyngognath teleosts. Amer. Zool. 21: 83–101.
Limbaugh, C. 1955. Fish life in the kelp beds and the effects of kelp harvesting. Univ. of California Institute of Marine Resources, IMR Ref. 55–9. 158 pp.
MacArthur, R.H. 1972. Geographical ecology. Harper and Row, New York. 269 pp.
MacArthur, R.H. & R. Levins. 1964. Competition, habitat selection, and character displacement in a patchy environment. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S. 51: 1207–1210.
Maynard Smith, J. 1978. Optimization theory in evolution. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Systematics 9: 31–56.
Norris, K.S. & J.H. Prescott. 1959. Jaw structure and tooth replacement in the opaleye, Girella nigricans (Ayres) with notes on other species. Copeia 1959: 275–283.
Olla, B.L., A.J. Bejda & A.D. Martin. 1975. Activity, movements and feeding behavior of the cunner, Tautogolabrus adspersus, and comparison of food habits with the young tautog, Tautoga onitus off Long Island, New York. U.S. Fish. Bull. 73: 895–900.
Quast, J.C. 1968. Observations on the food of kelp-bed fishes, pp. 109–142. In: W.J. North & C.L. Hubbs (ed.) utilization of Kelp-bed Resources in Southern California. Calif. Dep. Fish Game Fish Bull. 139.
Risk, M.J. 1972. Fish diversity on a coral reef in the Virgin Islands. Atoll Res. Bull. 153: 1–6.
Schmitt, R.J. & J.A. Coyer. 1982. The foraging ecology of sympatric surfperch congeners (Embiotoca): importance of foraging behavior in prey size selection. Oecologia (in press).
Schoener, T.W. 1969a. Models of optimal size for solitary predators. Amer. Nat. 103: 277–313.
Schoener, T.W. 1969b. Optimal size and specialization in constant and fluctuating environments: an energy-time approach. pp. 103–114. In: M. Dienes & R. Brown (ed.) Diversity and Stability in Ecological Systems, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York.
Tanaka, S.K. 1973. Suction feeding by the nurse shark. Copeia 1973: 606–608.
Tarp, F.H. 1952. A revision of the family Embiotocidae (the surfperches). Calif. Dep. Fish Game Fish Bull. 88: 1–99.
Terry, C.B. & J.S. Stephens, Jr. 1976. A study of the orientation of selected embiotocid fishes to depth and shifting seasonal vertical temperature gradients. Bull. Southern California Academy of Sciences 75: 170–183.
Turner, C.H., E.E. Ebert & R.R. Given. 1969. Man-made reef ecology. Calif. Dep. Fish Game Fish Bull. 146: 1–221.
Ware, D.M. 1972. Predation by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri): the influence of hunger, prey density, and prey size. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 29: 1193–1201.
Werner, E.E. & D.J. Hall. 1979. Foraging efficiency and habitat switching in competing sunfishes. Ecology 60: 256–264
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laur, D.R., Ebeling, A.W. (1983). Predator-prey relationships in surfperches. In: Noakes, D.L.G., Lindquist, D.G., Helfman, G.S., Ward, J.A. (eds) Predators and prey in fishes. Developments in environmental biology of fishes, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7296-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7296-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7298-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7296-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive