Skip to main content

Appendix The Logical Basis of Evolutionary Epistemology

Appendix The Logical Basis of Evolutionary Epistemology

  • Chapter
Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 36))

Abstract

The idea of an evolutionary approach to epistemology was first proposed to explain the nature of irreducible concepts in human knowledge, called “a priori” (see K. Lorenz, 1941). The further development of evolutionary epistemology (EE) was characterized by the application of the evolutionary method to all the other problems of epistemology that appear to be unsolvable within an analytical framework, based on deduction alone (Brunswik, 1955, Campbell, 1959; Kaspar, 1980; Lorenz, 1973; Oeser, 1976; Popper, 1972; Riedl, 1980; Vollmer, 1975; and Wuketits, 1981). Thus the claim is attached to EE that this theory is able to circumvent some of the basic short-comings of traditional and analytical philosophy (Riedl, 1980, pp. 175–184).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Albert, H.: Traktat über kritische Vernunft, J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik, E.: ‘ “Ratiomorphic” Models of Perception and Thinking’, Acta Psychol. 11 (1955), 108–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.: ‘Methodological Suggestions from a Comparative Psychology of Knowledge Processes’, Inquiry 2 (1959), 152–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: The Continuum of Inductive Methods, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, W.: ‘On Axiomatizability within a System’, J. Symb. Logics 18 (1953), 30–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, M.: ‘Selforganization of Matter and the Evolution of Biological Macromolecules’, Naturwiss. 58 (1971), 465–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J. S.: ‘A Successive Approximation Approach to Character Weighting’, Syst. Zool. 18 (1969), 374–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haken, H.: Synergetics, Springer, Berlin - Heidelberg - New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G.: ‘The Theoretician’s Dilemma’, in H. Feigl, M. Scriven, J. C. Maxwell (eds.), Concepts, Theories and the Mind-Body-Problem, Minneapolis, 1958, pp. 37–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspar, R.: ‘Die Evolution erkenntnisgewinnender Mechanismen’, Biologie in unserer Zeit 10 (1980), 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera, F. v.: Wissenschaftstheorie, 2 vols., W. Fink, Munich, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, L.: ‘Some Foundational Views on General Systems and the Hempel Paradox’, International J. Gen. Syst. 4 (1978), 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, L.: ‘Knowledge of Evolution and the Evolution of Knowledge’, in E. Jantsch (ed.), The Evolutionary Vision, AAAS-Symposium Vol. 61, Boulder, Colorado, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K.: ‘Kants Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte gegenwartiger Biologie’, Blätter für Deutsche Philosophie 15 (1941), 94–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K.: Die Rückseite des Spiegels: Versuch einer Natur geschichte menschlichen Erkennens, R. Piper & Co., Munich-Zürich, 1973 (English translation: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York - London, 1977.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeser, E.: Wissenschaft und Information, vol. 3: Struktur und Dynamik erfahrungswissenschaftlicher Systeme, Oldenbourg, Vienna - Munich, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H.: ‘Biological Systems Theory: Descriptive and Constructive Complementarity’, in G. Klir (ed.), Applied General Systems Research, Plenum Press, New York, 1978, pp. 511–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.: The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, Macmillan, London - New York, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remane, A.: Die Grundlagen des natürlichen System, der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik, Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R.: Die Ordnung des Lebendigen: Systembedingungen der Evolution, P. Parey, Hamburg - Berlin 1975. (English translation: Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R.: Biologie der Erkenntnis: Die stammesgeschichtlichen Grundlagen der Vernunft, P. Parey, Berlin - Hamburg, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohracher, C.: ‘Zufall und Notwendigkeit und ihre Bedeutung in der Morphologie’, unpublished report, Zoological Institute, University of Vienna, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwabhäuser, W.: Modelltheorie I, Bibilographisches Institut, Mannheim - Vienna - Zürich, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoenfield, J. R.: Mathematical Logic, Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. H. and Sokal, R. R. Numerical Taxonomy, Freeman, San Francisco, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, J. D.: The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, 1971.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: Das Problem der Induktion: Hume’s Herausforderung und moderne Antworten, Vieweg, Brunswick, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: The Structure and Dynamics of Theories, Springer, Berlin - Heidelberg - New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: The Structuralist View of Theories, Springer, Berlin - Heidelberg - New York, 1979a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: Rationale Rekonstruktion von Wissenschaft und ihrem Wandel, Reclam, Stuttgart, 1979b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F., Maturana H., and Uribe, R. ‘Autopoiesis: The Organization of Living Systems, its Characterization and a Model’, Biosystems 5 (1974), 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, G.: Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie, Hirzel, Stuttgart, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuketits, F. M.: Biologie und Kausalität: Biologische Ansätze zur Kausalität, Determination und Freiheit, P. Parey, Berlin-Hamburg, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A.: ‘Fuzzy Sets’, Information and Control 8 (1965), 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wagner, G.P. (1984). Appendix The Logical Basis of Evolutionary Epistemology. In: Wuketits, F.M. (eds) Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology. Theory and Decision Library, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7127-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7127-1_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7129-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7127-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics