Skip to main content

Complexity and Organizational Decision Making

  • Chapter
Coping with Complexity

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 33))

  • 65 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we investigate certain types of organizational forms which are considered to be sequentially computable rather than Turing computable, i.e., we are considering those organizations which are subject to definite resource and time constraints and which can be split into elemantary computational operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K. J., The Limits of Organization, Norton, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ford, L.R. and Fulkerson, D.R., Flows in Networks, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J. 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gottinger, H.W., ‘Qualitative Information and Comparative Informativeness’, Kybernetik (Biological Cybernetics) 13 (1973), 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hartmanis, J. and Stearns, R.E., Algebraic Structure Theory of Sequential Machines, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hurwicz, L., ‘Optimality and Informational Efficiency in Resource Allocation Processes’, Ch. 3 in Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, Calif., 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Luce, R.D. and Raiffa, H., Games and Decisions, Wiley, New York, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marschak, J. and Radner, R., The Economic Theory of Teams, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McGuire, C.B. and Marschak, T., Design of Organizations (unpublished notes), Univ. of California, Berkeley, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Perrow, C., Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay,Scotts, Foresman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Radner, R. and Rothschild, M., ‘The Allocation of Effort’, Journ. of Economic Theory 10 (1975), 358–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Radner, R., ‘A Behavioral Model of Cost Reduction’, Bell fount. of Economics 6 (1975), 196–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reiter, S., and Mount, K., ‘The Informational Size of Message Spaces’, Center for Math. Studies in Economics and Management Science, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, 122. Discussion Paper No. 3, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simon, H.A., ‘On How to Decide What to Do’, Bell Journ. of Economics 9 (1978), 494–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Slotnick, L., ‘The Fastest Computer’, Scientific American 224 (1971), 76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zissos, D., System Design with Microprocessors, Academic Press, London, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gottinger, H.W. (1983). Complexity and Organizational Decision Making. In: Coping with Complexity. Theory and Decision Library, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7024-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7024-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7026-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7024-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics