Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 15))

  • 164 Accesses

Abstract

At the end of his extensive survey of empirical studies on the relationship between people‘s sentiments and acts, Deutscher concludes that forty years of positivist research has not been able to produce consistent insights. He suggests that a “phenomenological perspective” might be more rewarding: “If I can come to see the world as [the man in the street] does, then I can come to understand the relationship between his talk and his action as he does.“1 Characteristic for the phenomenologist, according to Deutscher, is that he “seeks to understand the social world from the point of view of the actors in it.”2 This idea of phenomenological sociology is not uncommon. It is also defended by Phillipson and his collegues in New Directions in Sociological Theory, as appears from the statement that “the intentionalist style, recommended by phenomenological sociology, gives primacy to the modes of attention the actor gives to his world, takes the problem of meaning as its starting point, and understands action in terms of man‘s meaningful projects.“3 And of course many other authors propose similar standpoints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. I. Deutscher, What We Say/What We Do (Glenview, 1973), p. 330.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., p. 335.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Filmer, New Directions in Sociological Theory (London, 1973), p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. T. Campbell, ‘Social Attitudes and Other Acquired Dispositions’ in Psychology: A Study of Science, vol. 6, ed. S. Koch (1964), pp. 159–62.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Phillipson, in Filmer, p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. P. Gallacher, ‘On the Meaning of “Adequacy” in the Sociology of Alfred Schutz’ this volume, pp. 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Schutz, The Phenomenology of the Social World (London, 1967), pp. 62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Published under the title ‘The Problem of Rationality in the Social World’ Economica 10(1943): 130–49; also in Collected Papers, 2:64–90.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Probably also written in 1940, since it is mentioned in a letter of Schutz to Parsons dated 15 November 1940 (cf. R. Grathoff, ed., The Theory of Social Action [London 1978], p. 4).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14 (1953); also in Collected Papers, 1:3–47.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ‘Concept and Theory Formation in the Social Science’ Journal of Philosophy 51 (1954); also in Collected Papers, 1:48–66.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cf. D. Phillips, ‘Some Issues and Problems in the Study of Social Action’ Sociale Wetenschappen 16 (1973): 103–26; G. de Vries, Sociale Orde, Regels en de Sociologie (Meppel, 1979), p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cf. D. Phillips, ‘Some Issues and Problems in the Study of Social Action’ So dale Wetenschappen 16 (1973): 103–26; G. de Vries, Sociale Orde, Regels en de Sociologie (Meppel, 1979), p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Collected Papers, 1:52.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Phenomenology of the Social World, p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  16. In Grathoff, p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Vries, p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Collected Papers, 1:67, 211.

    Google Scholar 

  19. In Grathoff, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hereafter cited in the text as PL

    Google Scholar 

  21. I thank Dr. O. Gruengard for suggesting to me both the Oedipus and the check example.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gallacher, H.P. (1983). Schutz’s Thesis and the Moral Basis for Humanistic Sociology. In: Tymieniecka, AT., Schrag, C.O. (eds) Foundations of Morality, Human Rights, and the Human Sciences. Analecta Husserliana, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6975-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6975-9_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6977-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6975-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics