Skip to main content

The Influence of Subsurface Conditions on Hydraulically Induced Fractures in Deep Rocks

  • Conference paper
Hydraulic fracturing and geothermal energy

Part of the book series: Mechanics of elastic and inelastic solids ((MEIS,volume 5))

  • 321 Accesses

Abstract

A discussion is presented on the influence of subsurface conditions such as, stress,rock properties and pre-existing geologic structures on the shape and azimuth of hydraulically induced fractures in deep rocks. A systematic approach to optimum fracture design would require a combined field, laboratory and analytical effort to determine these conditions. Detailed field testing involves in situ stress measurements, fracture orientation determination and monitoring of flow rate and bottom hole pressure during the stimulation treatment. Laboratory tests would provide the mechanical and physical properties of the rock as well as its sensitivity to interaction with its pore fluid and the fracturing fluids used in the treatment. All information is to be synthesized into the fracture design utilizing computer simulators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C.R. Fast, G.B. Holman and R.J. Covlin, “A Study of the Application of MHF to the Tight Muddy “J” Formation Wattenberg Field, Adams and Weld Counties, Colorado,” Paper No. SPE 6524, 50th Annual Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas Texas, Sept. 28–Oct. 1, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E.R. Simonson, A.S. Abou-Sayed and R.J. Clifton, “Containment of Massive Hydraulic Fractures,” Paper No. SPE 6089, 51st Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Oct. 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.P. Cleary, “Primary Factors Governing Hydraulic Fractures in Heterogeneous Strati cified Porous Formations,” Paper No. 78-Pet-47, ASME Energy Technology Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, November 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. U. Ahmed, A.S. Abou-Sayed and A.H. Jones, “Experimental Evaluation of Fracturing Fluid Interaction with Tight Reservoir Rocks and Propped Fractures,” Paper No. SPE 7922, SPE/DOE Symposium on Low-Permeability Gas Reservoirs, Denver, Colorado, May 20–22, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W.J. McGuire and V.J. Sikora, “The Effect of Vertical Fractures on Well Productivity,” Trans. AIME Vol. 219, pp. 401–403, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Prats, P. Hazebroek and W.R. Stickler, “Effect of Vertical Fractures on Reservoir Behavior — Compressible Fluid Case,” Soc. of Pet. Eng. J., Vol. 2, pp. 87–94, June 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.M. Tinsley, J.R. Williams, Jr., R.L. Tiner and W.T. Malone, “Vertical Fracture Height — Its Effect on Steady-State Production Increase,” J. of Pet. Tech., Vol. 21, pp. 633–638, May 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.G. Agarwal, R.D. Carter and C.B. Pollock, “Evaluation and Prediction of Performance of Low Permeability Gas Wells Stimulated by Massive Hydraulic Fracturing,” Paper No. SPE 6838, 52nd Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, Oct 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Cinco-L and F. Samaniego-V, “Transient Pressure Analysis for Fractured Wells,” Paper No. SPE 7490, 53rd Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, Oct. 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N.R. Warpinski, R.A. Schmidt and D.A. Northrop, “In Situ Stresses-The Predominant Influence on Hydraulic Fracture Containment,” Paper No. SPE 8932, Unconventional Gas Recovery Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA, May 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M.E. Hanson, G.D. Anderson and R.J. Shaffer, “Effects of Various Parameters on Hydraulic Fracturing Geometry,” Paper No. SPE 8942, Unconventional Gas Recovery Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA, May 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Veatch, “Massive Hydraulic Fracturing,” Proceedings of the Geothermal Reservoir Well Stimulation Symposium, San Francisco, Feb. 1980 (Paper not submitted for publication).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.J. Clifton, “Some Thouqhts on Crack Growth in Hydraulic Fracturing,” Terra Tek Report TR 76–82, Oct. 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.W. Lambert, M.A. Trevits, and P.F. Steidl, “Vertical Borehole Design and Completion Practices to Remove Methane Gas from Mineable Coal beds,” U.S. Department of Energy Report No. DOE/CMTC/ TR-80/2, Aug. 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A.S. Abou-Sayed, A.H. Jones and E.R. Simonson, “On the Stimulation of Geothermal Reservoirs by Downward Hydraulic Fracturing,” Paper No. 77-Pet-81, ASME Energy Technology Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, Sept. 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K.G. Nolte and M.B. Smith, “Interpretation of Fracturing Pressures,” Paper No. SPE 8297, 54th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, Nevada, Sept. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K.G. Nolte, “Determination of Fracture Parameters from Fracturing Pressure Decline,” Paper No. SPE 8341, 54th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, Nevada, Sept. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.J. Clifton and A.S. Abou-Sayed, “On the Computation of the Three-Dimensional Geometry of Hydraulic Fractures,” Paper No. SPE 7943, SPE/DOE Symposium on Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs Denver, Colorado, May 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.J. Clifton and A.S. Abou-Sayed, “A Variational Approach to the Prediciton of the Three-Dimensional Geometry of Hydraulic Fractures,” SPE Paper No. 9879, SPE/DOE Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs Symposium, May 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Settari, “Simulation of Hydraulic Fracturing Process,” SPE Paper No. 7693, Fifth SPE Symposium on Numerical Simulation, Denver, Colorado, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S.H. Advani, “Finite Element Model Simulations Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing,” SPE Paper No. 8941, Unconventional Gas Recovery Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA, May 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M.P. Cleary, “Comprehensive Design Formulae for Hydraulic Fracturing,” SPE Paper No. 9259, 55th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, Sept. 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A.A. Daneshy, “True and Apparent Direction of Hydraulic Fractures,” Soc. of Pet. Eng. Jour., Vol. 12, pp. 149–163, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A.A. Daneshy, “A Study of Inclined Hydraulic Fractures,” Soc. of Pet. Eng. Jour., Vol. 14, pp. 61–68, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A.S. Abou-Sayed, C.E. Brechtel and R.J. Clifton, “In Situ Stress Determination by Hydrofracturing: A Fracture Mechanics Report,” J. of Geophys. Res., Vol. 83, No. 36, pp. 2851–2862, 1978.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. M.E. Smith, “Effect of Fracture Azimuth on Production with Application to Wattenberg Gas Field,” Paper No. SPE 8298, 54th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, Nevada, Sept. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M.B. Smith, J.M. Logan and D.M. Wood, “Fracture Azimuth — A Shallow Experiment,” J. of Energy Resource Technology, Vol. 102, pp. 99–105, June 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J.M. Hanson, and L.B. Owen, “Fracture Orientation Analysis by the Solid Earth Tidal Strain Method,” SPE 11070, SPE Annual Technical Conference, Sept. 26–29, 1982, New Orleans, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  29. B.C. Haimson, “Crustal Stress in the Continental United States as Derived from Hydrofracturing Tests,” in J.C. Heacock, ed: The Earth’s Crust, Geophys. Monograph Series, Vol. 20 AGU, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J.D. Bredehoeft, R.G. Wolff, W.S. Keys and E. Shuter, “Hydraulic Fracturing to Determine the Regional State of Tectonic Stress, Piceance Basin, Colorado”, Geol. Soc. America Bull., Vol. 87, pp. 250–258.

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. Zoback and D. Pollard, “Hydraulic Fracture Propagation and Interpretation of Pressure Time Records for In-Situ Stress Determinations,” 19th Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Stateline, Nevada, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M.D. Voegele, A.S. Abou-Sayed and A.H. Jones, “Optimization of Stimulation Design Through the Use of In Situ Stress Determination,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, DOE. Low Permeability Symposium, Denver, SPE 10308, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  33. M.K. Hubbert and D.G. Willis, “Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing,” Am. Inst. Mining Engineers Trans., Vol. 210, pp. 153–168, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  34. C. Fairhurst, “Methods of Determining In Situ Rock Stresses at Great Depths,” Univ. of Minnesota, Contract No. DA-25-066-ENG-14, 765 for the Missouri River Division, U.S. Army Corps, of Eng 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  35. C. Cooke, “Radial Differential Temperature Logging — A New Tool for Dectecting and Treating Flow Behind Casing,” SPE 7558, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  36. H.A. Van Eckelen, “Hydraulic Fracture Geometry: Fracture Containment in Layered Formations,” SPE 9261, Presented at the 55th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition of SPE, Dallas, Texas, Sept. 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  37. A.S. Abou-Sayed, U. Ahmed and A. Jones, “Systematic Approach to Massive Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment Design,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, DOE, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  38. N.R. Warpinski, J.A. Clark, R.A. Schmidt and C.W. Huddle, “Laboratory Investigation on the Effect of In Situ Stresses on Hydraulic Fracture Containment,” SPE 9834, Presented at the 1981 SPE/DOE Low Permeability Symposium, Denver, Colorado, May 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  39. L.W. Teufel and J.A. Clark, “Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Layered Rock: Experimental Studies of Fracture Containment,” SPE 9878 Presented at the 1981 SPE/DOE Low Permeability Symposium, Denver, Colorado, May 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  40. J.M. Gronseth and E. Detourney, “Improved Stress Determination Procedures by Hydraulic Fracturing,” Final Report for the U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California, Contract No. 14-08-0001-16768, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  41. B.C. Haimson, “A Comparison of Four Sets of Stress Measurements at the Nevada Test Site,” Proceedings, Workshop on Hydraulic Fracturing Stress Measurements, Monterey, California, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  42. M.K. Hubbert and D.G. Willis, Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing; Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Memoir, 18, pp. 239–257, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  43. M.K. Hubbert, “Natural and Induced Fracture Orientation,” Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Memoir,18, pp. 235–238, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  44. K.D. Min, “Analytical and Petrofabric Studies of Experimental Faluted Drape-Folds in Layered Rock Specimens,” Ph.D Dissertation, Texas A&M University, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  45. D.W. Stearns, “Mechanism of Drape Folding in the Wyoming Province” 23rd Annual Field Conf. Guidebook, WY. Geol. Assoc, pp. 125–143, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  46. M.B. Smith, G.B. Holman, C.R. Fast and R.J. Covlin, “The Azimuth of Deep, Penetrating Fractures in the Wattenberg Field,” Paper SPE 6092, 51st Annual Fall Meeting SPE-AIME, New Orleans, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  47. J.R. McWilliams, “The Role of Microstructure in the Physical Properties of Rock,” Testing Techniques of Rock Mechanics, ASTM-STP 402, pp. 175–189, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Friedman and J.M. Logan, “Influence of Residual Elastic Strain on the Orientation of Experimental Fractures in Three Ouartzose Sandstones,” Jour. Geophys. Res., Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 387–405, 1970.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. M. Friedman and T.R. Bur, “Investigations of the Relations among Residual Strain, Fabric, Fracture and Ultrasonic Attenuation and Velocity in Rocks,” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., Vol. 11, pp. 221–234, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. G.A. Komar, W.K. Overbey and R.J. Watts, “Prediction of Fracture Orientation from Oriented Cores and Aerial Photos in Sand Draw Field,” Wyoming; MERC/TPR-76/4, 12 pp., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  51. W.K. Overbey, “Effect of In Situ Stress on Induced Fractures,” Devonian Shale Production and Potential, Proc. 7th Appalachian Petroleum Geol. Symp., Morgantown, pp. 182–211, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  52. D.V. Power, C.L. Schuster, R. Hay and J. Twombly, “Detection of Hydraulic Fracture Orientation and Dimensions in Cased Wells,” Paper SPE 6526, 50th Annual Fall Meeting SPE-AIME, Dallas, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  53. M. Friedman and H.C. Heard, “Principal Stress Ratios in Cretaceous Limestones from Texas Gulf Coast,” Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologist Bull., Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 71–78, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  54. B.C. Haimson, “The Hydraulic Fracturing Technique for Stress Measurement,” Preprint, ISRM Symp. Advances in Stress Measurement, Sydney, Australia, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  55. D.T.J. Secor and D.D. Pollard, “On the Stability of Open Hydraulic Fractures in the Earth’s Crust,” Geophys. Res. Letters, Vol. 2, No. 11, pp. 51–513, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abou-Sayed, A.S. (1983). The Influence of Subsurface Conditions on Hydraulically Induced Fractures in Deep Rocks. In: Nemat-Nasser, S., Abé, H., Hirakawa, S. (eds) Hydraulic fracturing and geothermal energy. Mechanics of elastic and inelastic solids, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6884-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6884-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6886-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6884-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics