Skip to main content

EIA — The Relationship Between the Environmental Scientist and the Decision-Maker: A Canadian Perspective

  • Chapter
Environmental Impact Assessment

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 14))

  • 702 Accesses

Abstract

Decision-makers have always had advisers, but only recently have environmental scientists been advising those in power. The stature of the environmental scientist has increased due to a growing imperative to integrate environmental concerns into public decision-making. Today few question the need to include environmental concerns at all stages of development, beginning with the initial planning of the project, although some may not go as far as Holling (1) in insisting that they should be integrated as equal partners with economic and social consideration so that design can benefit from, and even enhance, natural forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Holling, C.S., ed. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management (Chichester, England: John Wiley, 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morgan, M.G. “Bad science and good policy analysis.” Science 20(1978)971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. March, J.G. “The technology of foolishness”, in J.G. March and J.P. Olsen, eds. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (Bergen, Norway: Universiteforlaget, 1976 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bowie, D.B. Incorporating environmental and social concerns into petroleum industry management: the Petro Canada experience (Calgary, Alberta: Petro Canada, 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. States, J.B. “A practical approach to biological inventories for ecological baseline studies”, in H.B. Lund et al., technical co-ordinators. Integrated Inventories of Renewable Natural Resources: Proceedings of the Workshop, General Technical Report RM-55 (Fort Collins, Colorado: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schindler, D.W. “The impact statement boondoggle.” Science 192(4239)(1978)509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Friesema, H.P. “Environmental impact statements and longrange environmental management”, in R.K. Jain and B.L. Hutchings, eds. Environmental Impact Analysis: Emerging Issues in Planning (Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. Draft Environmental Impact Statement: Proposed Federal/State Oil and Gas Lease Sale, Beaufort Sea(Anchorage, Alaska: U.S. Department of the Interior, 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alaska Highway Pipeline Panel. Impact of the Dempster Corridor on the Mackenzie Delta, Workshop held at Alaska Highway Pipeline Panel, Winnipeg, Manitoba, February 2 - 3, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Strong, M. The role of engineers in resource development: servants or leaders?, AMAX lecture delivered at Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, October 11, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mathews, W.H. “Moving beyond the environmental rhetoric.” Mazingria 4(2)(1980)6-14.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holling, C.S. Science for public policy: highlights of Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management, Research Report R-3 (Vancouver, British Columbia: Institute of Animal Resource Ecology, University of British Columbia, 1980 ).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baskerville, G. “Implementation of adaptive approach in provincial and federal forestry agencies”, in International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management: Current Progress and Prospects for the Approach. Summary Report, First Policy Seminar, CP-79-9 (Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wood, F.E.A. “Experience in implementing adaptive management and assessment”, in International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management: Current Progress and Prospects for the Approach. Summary Report, First Policy Seminar, CP-79-9 (Laxenburg, Austria: InternationalInstitute for Applied Systems Analysis, 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, S.B., ed. Alberta Oil Sands Environmental Research Program Interim Report, covering period April 1975 to November 1978 ( Edmonton, Alberta: Alberta Environment, 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wildavsky, A. Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis (Toronto, Ontario: Little, Brown and Company, (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quade, E.S. Analysis for Public Decisions (New York, New York: Elsevier, 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hilborn, R. “Some failures and successes in applying systems analysis to ecological systems.” Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 6(1979)25-31. Ecology, University of British Columbia, 1980 ).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Baskerville, G. “Implementation of adaptive approach in provincial and federal forestry agencies”, in International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management: Current Progress and Prospects for the Approach. Summary Report, First Policy Seminar, CP-79-9 (Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wood, F.E.A. “Experience in implementing adaptive management and assessment”, in International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management: Current Progress and Prospects for the Approach. Summary Report, First Policy Seminar, CP-79-9 (Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smith, S.B., ed. Alberta Oil Sands Environmental Research Program Interim Report, covering period April 1975 to November 1978 ( Edmonton, Alberta: Alberta Environment, 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wildavsky, A. Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis (Toronto, Ontario: Little, Brown and Company, (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Quade, E.S. Analysis for Public Decisions (New York, New York: Elsevier, (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hilborn, R. “Some failures and successes in applying systems analysis to ecological systems.” Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 6(1979)25-31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Everitt, R.R. (1983). EIA — The Relationship Between the Environmental Scientist and the Decision-Maker: A Canadian Perspective. In: Environmental Impact Assessment. NATO ASI Series, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6795-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6795-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6797-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6795-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics