Skip to main content

Fiscal Behavior of the Modern Democratic State: Public Choice Perspectives and Contributions

  • Chapter
Political Economy

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 2))

Abstract

My concerns center on political processes and, more particularly, American governmental decisions pertaining to the raising and spending of public monies. Fiscal choices are at the heart of politics. As Aaron Wildavsky has often noted, budgets are key political documents for they register the allocative and distributive choices that have been made or are being proposed. In this chapter I attempt to describe, integrate, and assess certain contributions of modern pubic choice to these questions of fiscal policy. The work of Bartlett, Borcherding, Breton, Browning, Buchanan and Tullock, Niskanen, and Tollison, to mention some of the more prominent, loom large. My survey is highly selective, but it is hoped not unreasonable or unfair. nontechnical contributions as well as work with a certain thrust are emphasized. highly specialzed empirical investigations are occasionally cited but not extensively discussed. Although important in a science of public choice, they are here deemed of lesser import to general students of public choice and finince. While cognizant of the value of surveys of the literature, I seek here a synthesis or a consistent point of view. The synthesis draws unequally upon two divergent perspectives: demand and supply models. In the former, citizen-condumers reign supreme; in the latter, politicians, bureaucrats, and goverments play roles not unlike those ascribed to monopolistic businesses by, say, J.K. galbraith.

The fundamental business of our representatives is taxing and spending

— E. S. Phelps “Rational Taxation” Social Research 44 (Winter, 1977): 657

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  • Duncan Black,The Theory of Committees and Elections ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony Downs,An Economic Theory of Democracy ( New York: Harper, 1957 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Eric Lindahl, “Just Taxation — A Positive Solution,” in Richard A. Musgrave and Alan T. Peacock, eds.,Classics in the Theory of Public Finance (London: Macmillan, 1958), pp. 168–76

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Hotelling, “Stability in Competition”,Economic Journal, 39 (March 1929): 47–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. R. Bowen, “The Interpretation of Voting in the Allocation of Economic Resources,”Quarterly Journal of Economics 58 (February 1943): 27–48; Black,Committees and Elections

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carolyn L. Weaver,The Crisis in Social Security (Durham: Duke University Press, 1982 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard E. Wagner, The Public Economy ( Chicago: Markham, 1973 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, “Just Taxation”; Hotelling, “Stability in Competition”; Bowen, “Voting in the Allocation of Economic Resources”; Paul A. Samuelson, “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure,”Review of Economic Statistics, 36 (November 1954): 386–89;

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles M. Tiebort, “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,”Journal of Political Economy, 64 (October 1956): 416–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Romer and Howard Rosenthal, “The Elusive Median Voter” unpublished paper, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony Downs, “Why the Government Budget Is Too Small in a Democracy,”World Politics, 12 (July 1960): 541–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James M. Buchanan and Gordon Tullock,The Calculus of Consent ( Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon Tullock, “Some Problems of Majority Voting,”Journal of Political Economy, 67 (December 1959): 571–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar K. Browning, “Social Insurance and Intergenerational Transfers,”Journal of Law and Economics, 16 (October, 1973 ): 215–37;

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar K. Browning, “Why the Social Insurance Budget is Too Large in a Democracy,”Economic Inquiry, 13 (September 1975): 373–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, “Some Problems in Majority Voting,” pp. 571–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs,An Economic Theory of Democracy, p. 297

    Google Scholar 

  • Knut Wicksell, “A New Principle of Just Taxation,” in Richard A. Musgrave and Alan T. Peacock eds.,Classics in the Theory of Public Finance ( London: Macmillan, 1958 ), pp. 72–118;

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, “Just Taxation”; Bowen, “Voting in the Allocation of Economic Resources”; Samuelson, “Public Expenditure” Richard A. Musgrave, “The Voluntary Exchange Theory of Public Economy,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 53 (February 1938): 213–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, AnEconomic Theory of Democracy

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon Tullock, “The Charity of the Uncharitable,”Western Economic Journal, 9 (December 1971): 379–92;

    Google Scholar 

  • George J. Stigler, “Director’s Law of Public Income Redistribution,”Journal of Law and Economics, 13 (April 1970): 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George J. Stigler, “The Theory of Economic Regulation,”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 3 (Spring 1971 ): 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon Tullock,The Politics of Bureaucracy (Washington, D. C.: Public Affairs Press, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  • William A. Niskanen, Jr., Bureaucracy and Representative Government ( Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1971 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon Tullock, Toward a Mathematics of Politics ( Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1965 )

    Google Scholar 

  • James M. Buchanan, “Social Choice, Democracy, and Free Markets,” Journal of Political Economy, 62 (April 1954): 114–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James M. Buchanan Public Finance in Democratic Process ( Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1967 )

    Google Scholar 

  • James M. Buchanan The Demand and Supply of Public Goods ( Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall Bartlett, Economic Foundations of Political Power ( New York: The Free Press, 1973 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert Breton, The Economic Theory of Representative Government ( Chicago: Aldine, 1974 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, “The Theory of Economic Regulation” Robert D. Tollison and Robert E. McCormick,Politicians, Legislation, and the Economy (Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1981 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald Wittman, “Parties as Utility Maximizers,” American Political Science Review, 67 (June 1973): 490–98;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerald Sirkin, “The Anatomy of Public Choice Failure,” in R. D. Leiter and G. Sirkin, eds., Economics of Public Choice (New York: Cyrco Press, 1975); Sam Peltzman, “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation,” Journal of Law and Economics, 19 (August 1976): 211–40;

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter H. Aranson and Peter C. Ordeshook, “A Prolegomenon to a Theory of the Failure of Representative Democracy,” in R. Auster and B. Sears, eds., American Revolution: Papers and Proceedings ( Tucson: University of Arizona, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Susan Rose-Ackerman,Corruption: A Study in Political Economy ( New York: Academic Press, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • R. D. Auster and Morris Silver, The State as a Firm (Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis C. Mueller, Public Choice ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard E. Wagner, “Boom and Bust: The Political Economy of Economic Disorder,”Journal of Libertarian Studies, 4 (Winter 1980 ): 1–37;

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert J. Mackay and Carolyn L. Weaver, “Monopoly Bureaus and Fiscal Outcomes: Deductive Models and Implications for Reform,” in Gordon Tullock and Richard E. Wagner, eds.,Policy Analysis and Deductive Reasoning ( Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1978 ), pp. 141–66;

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert J. Mackay and Carolyn L. Weaver, “Agenda Control by Budget Maximizers in a Multi-Bureau Setting,”Public Choice, 37 (1981): 447–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay and Weaver, “Agenda Control by Budget Maximizers.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles R. Plott, “Axiomatic Social Choice Theory,” American Journal of Political Science, 20 (August 1976): 511–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, “Boom and Bust” p. 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, The Politics of Bureaucracy; Niskanen, Bureaucracy and Representative Government; Niskanen, “Bureaucrats and Politicians,”Journal of Law and Economics, 18 (December 1975): 617–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sam Peltzman, “Pricing in Public and Private Enterprises: Electric Utilities in the U.S.,” Journal of Law and Economics, 14 (April 1971): 109–47;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, “Toward a More General Theory of Economic Regulation”; Richard A. Posner, “Theories of Economic Regulation,” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5 (Autumn 1974 ): 335–58;

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack Hirschleifer, “Comment” on Sam Peltzman, “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation,”Journal of Law and Economics, 19 (August 1976): 241–44;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton M. Lindsay, “A Theory of Government Enterprise,”Journal of Political Economy, 84 (1976): 1061–77;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce M. Owen and Ronald Braeutigam, The Regulation Game ( Cambridge: Ballinger, 1978 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Melvin W. Reder, “The Theory of Employment and Wages in the Public Sector,” in Daniel Hamermesh, ed., Labor in the Public and Non-Profit Sectors (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975); ch. 3,

    Google Scholar 

  • George J. Boijas,Wage Policy in the Federal Bureaucracy (Washington, D. C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1980 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton and Rose Friedman,Free to Choose (New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1980 ), p. 31

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugh Dalton,Principles of Public Finance ( 1922; reprint ed., New York: Augustus M. Kelly, Publishers, 1967 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard A. and Peggy B. Musgrave,Public Finance in Theory and Practice, 3rd ed. ( New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard E. Wagner, “Economic Manipulation for Political Profit: Macro-Economic Consequences and Constitutional Implication,” Kyklos, 30 (1977): 395–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman Frohlich, Joe A. Oppenheimer, and Oran R. Young, Political Leadership and Collective Goods (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancur Olson, Jr.,The Logic of Collective Action ( Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton Friedman, “Introduction” to Mary Bennett Peters, The Regulated Customer (Ottawa, 111.: Green Hill Publishers, 1971), p. IV

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Allen Wallis, The Overgoverned Society (New York; Macmillan, 1976 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, “Director’s Law of Public Income Redistribution” Tullock, “The Charity of the Uncharitable.”

    Google Scholar 

  • D. G. Hartle,A Theory of the Expenditure Budgetary Process ( Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Edward R. Tufte, Political Control of the Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978 )

    Google Scholar 

  • William D. Nordhaus, “The Political Business Cycle,” Review of Economic Studies, 42 (April 1975): 169–90;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno S. Frey, Modern Political Economy ( New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1978 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaron Wildvasky,How to Limit Government Spending ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph G. Penner, “The Nonsense Amendment,” New York Times, 28 March 1982, p. 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Penner, “The Nonsense Amendment” James T. Bennett and Thomas J. Di- Lorenzo, “Underground Government: Subverting Constraints on Public Sector Expansion,”Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, 6 (Fall, 1981 ): 219–33

    Google Scholar 

  • James T. Bennett and Thomas J. DiLorenzo, “How the Government Evades Taxes,” Policy Review, 19 (Winter 1982 ): 71–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, “Boom and Bust.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton Friedman, “The Limitations of Tax Limitation,”Policy Review, 5(Summer 1978 ): 7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray L. Weidenbaum,Business, Government, and the Public ( Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, “Bureaucrats and Politicians.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl A. Thompson, review ofBureaucracy and Representative Government by William A. Niskanen, Journal of Economic Literature, 11 (September-December 1973 ): 950–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert Breton and R. Wintrobe, “The Equilibrium Size of a Budget Maximizing Bureau,” Journal of Political Economy, 83 (February 1975): 195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard D. McKenzie and Gordon Tullock, Modern Political Economy ( New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans van den Doel,Democracy and Welfare Economics ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979 )

    Google Scholar 

  • David Friedman, “A Theory of the Size and Shape of Nations,”Journal of Political Economy, 85 (1977): 59-77. Geoffrey Brennan and James M. Buchanan, The Power to Tax ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrey Brennan and James M. Buchanan, The Power to Tax ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Public Finance in Democratic Process

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph E. Miner, “Some Observations of the Political Economy of Property Tax Reform,” Public Choice, 17 (Spring 1974 ): 49–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave and Musgrave, Public Finance

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul Craig Roberts, “Idealism in Public Choice Theory,”Journal of Monetary Economics, 4 (1978): 603–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, “Size and Shape of Nations.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan and Buchanan, The Power to Tax

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodore J. Eismeier, “No End to Loopholes,” Journal of Contemporary Studies (Winter 1981 ): 39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • E. E. Schattschneider,Politics, Pressures and the Tariff ( New York: Prentice-Hall, 1935 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul Craig Roberts and Richard E. Wagner, “The Tax Reform Fraud,” Policy Review, 9 (Summer 1979 ): 121–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan and Buchanan, The Power to Tax

    Google Scholar 

  • James M. Buchanan and Marilyn Flowers, “An Analytical Setting for a Taxpayers’ Revolution,”Western Economic Journal, 1 (December 1969): 349–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard Musgrave, “Tax Revolt,”Social Science Quarterly, 59 (March 1979): 697–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, “Political Economy of Property Tax Reform” Miner and Chalice, “Representation, Redistribution and Group Size” (Paper delivered at the 1975 Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society, Chicago, April 3, 1975 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard E. Wagner, “Limiting Government Budgets: The Misplaced Emphasis,” Policy Report, 1 (Octover 1979): 1–7; Brennan and Buchanan,The Power to Tax

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts and Wagner, “The Tax Reform Fraud.”

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Kalecki, “Political Aspects of Full Employment,”The Political Quarterly, 4 (October/December 1943 ): 322–31

    Google Scholar 

  • James Gwartney and Jonathan Silberman, “Distribution of Costs and Benefits and the Significance of Collective Decision Rules,”Social Science Quarterly, 26 (December 1973): 568–78

    Google Scholar 

Selected Bibliography

  • Dennis Mueller,Public Choice ( New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony Downs, AnEconomic Theory of Democracy ( New York: Harper and Row, 1957 )

    Google Scholar 

  • This is an important element in the famous statement on the components of democracy as provided by Robert Dahl,Who Governs? ( New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961 )

    Google Scholar 

  • The person who makes this important addition quite clearly is Timothy Bates,Economic Man as Politician ( Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press, 1976 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell points out that the important work in this area is from Gordon Tullock, “The Charity of the Uncharitable,”Western Economic Journal 9 (December 1971): 379–92;

    Google Scholar 

  • George Stigler, “Director’s Law of Public Income Redistribution,” Journal of Law and Economics 13 (April 1970): 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancur Olson,The Logic of Collective Action ( Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver Williamson’sMarkets and Hierarchies (New York: Free Press, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven Cheung,The Myth of Social Costs ( London: The Institute of Economic Affairs, 1978 ), p. 53

    Google Scholar 

  • Margaret Levi and Douglass C. North, “Towards a Property-Rights Theory of Exploitation,”Politics and Society 11, no. 3 (1982): 315–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglass C. North and Robert Thomas,The Rise of the Western World ( New York: Cambridge University Press, 1973 )

    Google Scholar 

  • “The Predatory Theory of Rule,”Politics and Society 10, no. 4 (1981): 431–65

    Google Scholar 

  • William Brustein, “A Regional Mode of Production Analysis of Political Behavior,” Politics and Society 10, no. 4 (1981): 355–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Max Weber,Economy and Society, ed. Guenther Roth and Carl Wittich ( New York: Bedminster Press, 1968 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel Ardant,Histoire de L’impot, 2 vols. ( Paris: Fayard, 1971 )

    Google Scholar 

  • See Levi, “The Predatory Theory of Rule,” pp. 431–35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Larry L. Wade

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mitchell, W.C. (1983). Fiscal Behavior of the Modern Democratic State: Public Choice Perspectives and Contributions. In: Wade, L.L. (eds) Political Economy. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6658-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6658-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6660-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6658-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics