Skip to main content

Ways of Detecting Adaptive Responses of Cultivated Plants to Drought. An Agronomic Approach

  • Chapter

Part of the Tasks for vegetation science book series (TAVS,volume 13)

Abstract

Plants are exposed to water deficits whenever the rate of water loss exceeds that of water absorption. The rate of water loss is determined by the atmospheric evaporative demand and the stomatal control of transpiration while the rate of water absorption depends on both the availability of soil water and the extent of the root system. By definition, cells and tissues are regarded as water-deficient or water-stressed when their water potential falls below zero (Crafts, 1968; Kramer, 1969). Given that the state of full turgor is hardly achieved (for a review, see Karamanos, 1980), plants are usually water-stressed during the greatest part of the day showing the most negative values of their water potential around midday (Namken et al., 1969). Under conditions of high evaporative demand plants are water-stressed to a considerable extent even when soil water is adequate (Denmead, Shaw, 1962). It follows that water stress is particularly intense in plants growing in places of low rainfall and high evaporative demand.

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
EUR   29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR   42.79
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR   52.74
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackerson RC (1980) Stomatal response of cotton to water stress and abscissic acid as affected by water stress history, Pl. Physiol. 65, 455–459.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerson RC and Krieg DR (1977) Stomatal and non-stomatal regulation of water use in cotton, corn and sorghum, Pl. Physiol. 60, 850–853.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Austin RB and Jones HG (1975) The physiology of wheat, Rep. Plant Breed. Inst. 1974, pp 20–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg JE and Turner NC (1976) Crop water deficits, Adv. Agron. 28, 161–217.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berger A (1971) La circulation de l’eau dans le système solplante. Etude de quelques résistances, en relation avec certains facteurs du millieu, Thèse de doctorat d’état, Montpellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biscoe, PV, Cohen Y and Wallace JS (1976) Daily and seasonal changes of water potential in cereals, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 273, 565–580.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A (1979) Genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants: A case for sorghum, In Mussell H and Staples RC eds, Stress Physiology in Crop Plants, pp 429–445, New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum A and Ebercon A (1976) Genotypic responses in sorghum to drought stress. III. Free proline accumulation and drought resistance, Crop Sci. 16, 428–431.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boggess SF, Stewart CR, Aspinall D and Paleg LG (1976) Effect of water stress on proline synthesis from radioactive precursors, Pl. Physiol. 58, 398–401

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer JS and McPherson HG (1975) Physiology of water deficits in cereal crops, Adv. Agron. 27, 1–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brcwn KW (1976) Sugar beet and potatoes, In Monteith JL ed., Vegetation and the Atmosphere, vol. 2, pp 65–86, London, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown KW, Jordan WR and Thomas JC (1976) Water stress induced alterations of the stomatal response to decreases in leaf water potential, Physiologia Pl. 37, 1–5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung YNS, Tyree MT and Dainty J (1976) Some possible sources of error in determining bulk elastic moduli and other parameters from pressure-volume curves of shoots and leaves, Can. J. Bot. 54, 758–765.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Crafts AS (1968) Water structure and water in the plant body, In Kozlowski TT ed., Water Deficits and Plant Growth, pp 23–47, New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg KA (1979) Beyond the Green Revolution, New York, Plenum.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Denmead OT and Shaw RH (1962) Availability of soil water to plants as affected by soil moi-sture content and meteorological conditions, Agron. J. 54, 385–389.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis FB, Elliott JG, Barnes BT and Howse KR (1977) Comparison of direct drilling, reduced cultivation and ploughing on the growth of cereals. II Spring barley on a sandy loam soil: Soil physical conditions and root growth, J. agric. Sci. 89, 631–642.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Esau K (1965) Plant Anatomy, New York, John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah SM (1979)An examination of the effects of water stress on leaf growth of crops of field beansVicia faba L. Ph.D. Thesis University of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch-Savage WE and Elston J (1982) The effect of temperature and water stress on the timing of leaf death in Vicia faba, Ann. appl. Biol. 100, 567–579.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner WR and Ehlig CF (1965) Physical aspects of the internal water relations of plant leaves, Pl. Physiol. 40, 705–710.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haines FM (1950) The relations between cell dimensions, osmotic pressure and turgor pressure, Ann. Bot. 14, 385–394.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson AD, Nelsen CE and Everson EA (1977) Evaluation of free proline accumulation as an index of drought resistance using two contrasting barley cultivars, Crop Sci. 17, 720–726.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hellkvist J, Richards GP and Jarvis PG (1974) Vertical gradients of water potential and tissue water relations in sitka spruce trees measured with the pressure chamber, J appl. Ecol. 11, 637–667.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao TC (1973) Plant responses to water stress, A. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24, 519–570.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao TC, Acevedo E, Fereres E and Henderson EW (1976) Water stress, growth, and osmotic adjustment, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 273, 479–500.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd EA (1976) Plant breeding for drought resistance,In Kozlowski TT ed. v. IV pp 317–353, New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones MM and Turner NC (1978) Osmotic adjustment in leaves of sorghum in response to water deficits, Pl. Physiol. 61, 122–126.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karamanos AJ (1976) An analysis of the effect of water stress on leaf area growth in Vicia faba L. in the field, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamanos AJ (1978a) Understanding the origin of the response of plants to water stress by means of an equilibrium model, Praktika Acad. Athens, 53, 308–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamanos AJ (1978b) Water stress and leaf growth of field beans (Vicia faba L.) in the field: Leaf number and total leaf area, Ann. Bot. 42, 1393–1402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamanos AJ (1980) Response in plant water status to integrated values of soil matric potential calculated from soil water depletion by a field bean crop, Aust. J. Pi. Physiol. 7, 51–66.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Karamanos AJ (1981) Case examples of research progress in drought-stress physiology. Vicia faba. In Simpson GM ed., Water Stress on Plants, pp. 199–234, New York, Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamanos AJ (1981) Case examples of research progress in drought-stress physiology. Vicia faba. In Simpson GM ed., Water Stress on Plants, pp. 199–234, New York, Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassam AH (1973) Influence of light and water deficit upon diffusive resistance of leaves of Vicia faba, New Phytol. 72, 557–570.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Klepper B, Taylor HM, Huck MG and Fiscus EL (1973) Water relations and growth of cotton in drying soil, Agron. J. 65, 307–310.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Knipling EB (1967) Effect of leaf aging on water deficit-water potential relationships of dogwood leaves growing in two environments, Physiologia Pl. 20, 65–72.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer PJ (1969) Plant and Soil-Water Relationships. A Modern Synthesis, New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larcher W (1975) Physiological Plant Ecology, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt J (1972) Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses, London, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Cree KJ (1974) Changes in Steinatal response characteristics of grain sorghum produced by water stress during growth, Crop Sci. 14, 273–278.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mc Michael BL, Jordan WR and Powell RD (1972) An effect of water stress on ethylene production by intact cotton petioles, Pl. Physiol. 49, 658–660.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millar AA, Duysen ME, and Wilkinson GE (1968) Internal water balance of barley under soil moisture stress, Pl. Physiol. 43, 968–972.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milthorpe FL (1945) Fibre development of flax in relation to water supply and light intensity, Ann. Bot. 9, 31–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan JM (1977) Changes in diffusive conductance and water potential of wheat plants before and after anthesis, Aust. J. Pl. Physiol. 4, 75–86.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Namken LN, Bartholic JF and Runkies JR (1969) Monitoring cotton plant stem radius as an indication of water stress, Agron. J. 61, 891–893.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, EI (1966) Relationship between root growth of flax (Linwn usitatissimum) and soil water potential, New Phytol. 65, 273–283.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole JC and Chang TT (1979) Drought resistance in cereals. Rice: A case study In Mussell H and Staples RC eds; Stress Physiology in Crop Plants, pp 373–405, New York, John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orshan G (1964) Seasonal dimorphism of desert Mediterranean chamaephytes and its significance as a factor in their water economy, In Rutter AJ and Whitehead FH eds, The Water Relations of Plants, pp 206–222, Edinburgh, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orshan G (1972) Morphological and physiological plasticity in relation to drought, Proc. Int. Symp. Wildland Shrub Biol, and Utilization at Utah State Univ. pp 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paleg LG, Douglas TJ, van Daal A and Keech DB (1981) Proline, betaine and other organic solutes protect enzymes against heat inactivation, Aust. J. PI. Physiol. 8, 107–114.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker J (1968) Drought resistance mechanisms In Kozlcwski TT ed. Water Deficits and Plant Growth, v. I, pp 195–234, New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raschke K (1975) Stomatal action, A Rev. Plant Physiol. 26, 309–340.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richter H, Duhme F, Glatzel G, Hinckley TM and Karlic H (1980) Some limitations and applications of the pressure-volume curve technique in ecophysiological research, In Grace J, Ford ED and Jarvis PG eds, Plants and their Atmospheric Environment, pp 263–272, Oxford, Blachwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Diaz MF and Kramer PJ (1971) Behaviour of corn and sorghum under water stress and during recovery, Pl. Physiol. 48, 613–616.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Diaz MF and Kramer PJ (1973) Turgor differences and water stress in maize and sorghum leaves during drought and recovery, J. Exp. Bot. 24, 511–515.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Singh TN, Aspinall D and Paleg LG (1972) Proline accumulation and varietal adaptability to drought in barley: a potential metabolic measure of drought resistance, Nature New Biol. 236, 188–190.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh TN, Aspinall D, Paleg LG and Boggess SF (1973) Stress metabolism. II Changes in proline concentration in excised plant tissues, Aust. J. biol. Sci. 26, 57–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stayer RO (1967) Plant-Water Relationships, London, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steudle E, Zimmermann U and Luttge U (1977) Effects of turgor pressure and cell size on the wall elasticity of plant cells, Pl. Physiol. 59, 285–289.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart CR (1973) The effect of wilting on proline metabolism in excised bean leaves in the dark, Pl. Physiol. 51, 508–511.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart CR (1980) The mechanism of ABA- induced proline accumulation in barley leaves, Pl. Physiol. 66, 230–233.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, CR, Boggess SF, Aspinall D and Paleg LG (1977) Inhibition of proline oxidation by water stress, Pl. Physiol. 59, 930–932.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart GR and Lee JA (1974) The role of proline accumulation in halophytes, Planta 120, 279–289.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stout DG and Simpson GM (1978) Drought resistance of Sorghum bioolor. 1. Drought avoidance mechanisms related to leaf water status, Can. J. PI. Sci. 58, 213–224.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Turner NC (1974) Stomatal behaviour and water status of maize, sorghum and tobacco under field conditions. 11 At low soil water potential, PI. Physiol. 53, 360–365.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner NC (1979) Drought resistance and adaptation to water deficits in crop plants, In Mussel H and Staples RC eds, Stress Physiology in Crop Plants, pp 343–372, New York, John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner NC and Begg JE (1973) Stomatal behaviour and water status of maize, sorghum and tobacco under field conditions. I. At high soil water potential, Pl. Physiol. 51, 31–36.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyree MT (1976) Negative turgor in plant cells: fact or fallacy? Can. J. Bot. 54, 2738–2746.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tyree MT and Hammel HT (1972) The measurement of the turgor pressure and the water relations of plants by the pressure-bomb technique, J. exp. Bot. 23, 267–282.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tyree MP and Karamanos AJ (1981) Water stress as an ecological factor, In Grace J, Ford ED and Jarvis PG eds, Plants and their Atmospheric Environment, pp 237–261, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyree MP, Cheung YNS, McGregor ME and Talbot AJB (1978) The characteristics of seasonal and ontogenetic changes in the tissue-water relations of Acer, Populus, Tsuga and Picea, Can. J. Bot. 56, 635–647.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Waldren, RP, Teare RP and Ehrler SW (1974) Changes in free proline concentration in sorghum and soybean plants under field conditions, Crop Sci. 14, 447–450.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver JE (1926) Root Development of Field Crops New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wein HC, Littleton EJ, and Ayanaba A (1979) Drought stress of cowpea and soybean under tropical conditions, In Mussel H and Staples RC eds, Stress Physiology in Crop Plants, pp 283–302, New York, John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenkert W, Lemon ER and Sinclair TR (1978) Water content-potential relationship in soya bean: Changes in component potentials for mature and immature leaves under field conditions, Ann. Bot. 42, 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karamanos, A.J. (1984). Ways of Detecting Adaptive Responses of Cultivated Plants to Drought. An Agronomic Approach. In: Margaris, N.S., Arianoustou-Faraggitaki, M., Oechel, W.C. (eds) Being alive on land. Tasks for vegetation science, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6578-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6578-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6580-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6578-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics