Abstract
No doubt, one of the most important tasks for a descriptive theory of legal science is the analysis of actual juristic sentences. However, in juristic discourse (legal doctrine, or legal dogmatics) sentences of different kinds are met. To which among them is it proper to’ pay special attention? In the existing literature reductionist tendencies sometimes prevail. On the one hand, juristic discourse is often reduced to a set of sentences of just one kind only. On the other hand, each author usually ascribes to these sentences a univocal meaning by means of a stipulation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
H. Kelsen, Reine Rechtslehre, Deuticke, Wien, 1960, ch.III, sect.16.
H. Kelsen, “Value Judgments in the Science of Law”, 1942, in H.Kelsen, What Is Justice? Justice, Law, and Politics in the Mirror of Science, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1957, ch.VIII.
H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law, Clarendon, Oxford, 1961, ch. VI, sect. 1, and ch.4, sect. 2.
C.E. Alchourrón, E. Bulygin, Normative Systems, Springer, Wien and New York, 1971, ch.VII
C.E. Alchourrón, E. Bulygin, Introducción a la metodología de las ciencias juridicas y sociales, Astrea, Buenos Aires, 1974, ch.VII.
G.H. von Wright, Norm and Action, Routledge, Kegan Paul, London, 1963, esp. ch.VII.
I.Niiniluoto, “On Truth and Argumentation in Legal Dogmatics”, in Rechtstheorie, Beiheft 2, 1981
I.Niiniluoto, “On the Truth of Norm Propositions”, in Rechtstheorie, Beiheft 3, 1981.
A. Ross, On Law and Justice, Stevens, London, 1958, pp. 44 ff.
A. Aarnio, Philosophical Perspectives in Jurisprudence, Acta Philosophica Fennica 36, Helsinki, 1983, ch.VIII. A lot of important (non-reductionist)
A. Wedberg, “Some Problems in the Logical Analysis of Legal Science”, in Theoria, 17, 1951.
Cf .A.G. Conte, Studio per una teoria della validity, 1970, in R.Guastini (ed.), Problemi di teoria del diritto, Mulino, Bologna, 1980.
Cf.J. Wróblewski, “Verification and Justification in the Legal Science”, in Rechtstheorie, Beiheft 1, 1979
J. Wróblewski, “Tre Concetti di validity”, in Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, 36, 1982.
R. Guastini, “I giuristi alia ricerca della scienza. Rileggendo Bobbio”, to be published in Revista de ciencias sociales ( Valparaíso, Chile ), 1984.
Cf. J. Wróblewski, “Statements on the Relation of Conduct and Norm”, in Etudes de logique juridique, IV, 1970.
K. Opalek, “Norm and Conduct. The Problem of the‘Fulfillment’ of the Norm”, in H. Hubien (ed.), Le raisonnement juridique, Bruylant, Bruxelles, 1971.
K. Opalek, “Directives, Optatives, and Value Statements”, in Etudes de logique juridique, VII, 1978.
K. Opalek, “Les normes, les énoncés sur les normes, et les propositions déontiques”, in Archives de philosophie du droit, 17, 1972.
K. Opalek, “Doing Things with Words’ and the Law”, in Anuario de filosofla del derecho, 17, 1974.
Cf.Z.Ziembifński, “Le langage du droit et le langage juridique. Les critéres de leur discernement”, in Archives de philosophie du droit, 19, 1974.
Cf.A.Peczenik, Non-Equivalent Transformations and the Law, in Rechtstheorie, Beiheft 1, 1979.
A.Aarnio, R.Alexy, A.Peczenik, “The Foundation of Legal Reasoning”, in Rechtstheorie, 12, 1981.
A.Peczenik, The Basis of Legal Justification, Lund, 1983.
R.M. Hare, The Language of Morals, Clarendon, Oxford, 1952, passim.
U. Scarpelli, “Le l’proposizioni giuridiche1 come precetti reiterati”, in Rivista internazionale di filo- sofia del diritto, 44, 1967.
T. Mazzarese, “Metanorme e linguaggio deontico: un’analisi logico”, in Materiali per un’ storia della cultura giuridica, 12, 1982.
R. Guastini, “Metateoria degli atteggiamenti normativi”, in Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica, 12, 1982.
R. Guastini, Lezioni di teoria analitica del diritto, Giappichelli, Torino, 1982
H. Kelsen, Allgemeine Theorie der Normen, Manz, Wien, 1979, p. l. On directive speech acts cf.J.R.Searle, “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts”, 1975, and “Indirect Speech Acts”, 1975, both in J.R. Searle, Expression and Meaning, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 1979.
Cf.J. Wróblewski, Meaning and Truth in Judicial Decision, Juridica, Helsinki, 1983 2, esp. ch. s. II and IV.
J. Wróblewski, “L’interprétation en droit: théorie et idéologie”, in Archives de philosophie du droit, 17, 1972.
H.L.A.Hart, “The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights”, 1949, in H.L.A.Hart, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, Clarendon, Oxford, 1983.
K. Opalek, “The Problem of ‘Directive Meaning’”, in Festskrift till Alf Ross, Juristenbundets forlag, København, 1969;
K. Opalek, “On the Logical-Semantic Structure of Directives”, in Etudes de logique juridique, I V, 1970.
A.G. Conte, “Aspekte der Semantik der deontischen Sprache”, in A.G. Conte, R. Hilpinen, G.H. von Wright (eds.), Deontische Logik und Semantik, Athenaion, Wiesbaden, 1977.
A.G.Conte, “Konstitutive Regeln und Deontik”, in E. Morscher, R. Stranzinger (eds.), Ethik. Akten des Flinften Internationalen Wittgenstein- Symposiums, Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, Wien, 1981.
G.Carcaterra, Le norme costitutive, Giuffre, Milano, 1974.
G.Carcaterra, La forza costitutiva delle norme, Bulzoni, Roma, 1979.
M.-E.Conte, “La pragmatica linguistica”, in C.Segre (ed.), Intorno alia linguistica, Feltrinelli, Milano, 1983.
R.Guastini, “Teorie delle regole costitutive”, to be published in Rivista internazionale di filosofia del diritto, 1984.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guastini, R. (1984). A Tentative Analysis of Two Juristic Sentences. In: Peczenik, A., Lindahl, L., Roermund, B.V. (eds) Theory of Legal Science. Synthese Library, vol 176. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6481-5_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6481-5_49
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6483-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6481-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive